JBI's RU-vid channel offers a range of videos related to evidence-based healthcare, evidence synthesis and evidence implementation.
JBI is a global organisation promoting and supporting evidence-based decisions that improve health and health service delivery. JBI offers a unique range of solutions to access, appraise and apply the best available evidence.
We welcome feedback, so please leave comments on our videos. We would love to hear from you!
Could you tell me about the research question, I'm confused. Do I create the question, is it the publication authors' question? How is the question created and by whom please?
Hi Pamela, The research question is the question that guides the conduct of the scoping review, not the publication authors’ question. The review question is identified and created by the review team. Please check the JBI Manual of Evidence Synthesis for details at jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862667/10.2.2+Developing+the+title+and+question Alternatively you can reach out to jbisynthesis@adelaide.edu.au if you have further questions.
Dear team, thanks for the video! What kind of extraction model do you recommend? Im a looking for a literatur extraction tool or an Example Excel Template for a Scoping Review. Do you have andy recomendations besides the one in your published paper?
JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: Chapter 10 (link below), offers a template for extracting source details, characteristics, and results. This might need to be adapted for specific scoping review topics, with appropriate citation to the JBI methodology guidance for scoping reviews. jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355863340/Appendix+10.1+JBI+template+source+of+evidence+details%2C+characteristics+and+results+extraction+instrument
@@JBIEBHC But this is a data extraction source for scoping reviews, right? As they ask for a "scoping Review title". In a ScR I will search for a lot of different kind of literatures. Which data extraction source should I use for various literature? Hope I could explain my question in a clearer way.
@@sini3992 This is the data extraction template for scoping reviews. The Scoping Review Details and Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria fields are to provide background information of the scoping review to be conducted for the extractor. The Evidence source Details and Characteristics are about the various sources to be included in the scoping review and should be adapted for different evidence sources, for example the extraction fields for data from a study might be different from a government report. You can also visit our Journal website journals.lww.com/jbisrir/pages/default.aspx for published scoping review examples, or you can contact our team at jbisynthesis@adelaide.edu.au for more enquiries.
JBI’s first guidance on scoping review was published in 2015, with major updates and clarifications published in 2020. You can find JBI's latest guidance for reviewers in the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. There is a chapter devoted to scoping reviews: jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/355862497/10.+Scoping+reviews Here are some references: Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):141-6. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119-26.
If they’re preventable, what’s the strategy? Some might have been. Most of them are difficult to say between new procedures and old procedures, new hospitals and old ones, who’s to say what they could prevent and what they can’t?
There are tools that can assist with the deduplication process before screening, such as Covidence, SRA-Deduplicator, and EndNote. JBI SUMARI is currently developing this feature and will be available to users soon!
Pleased to hear you enjoyed this presentation! You can find our JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis at synthesismanual.jbi.global where underneath the table of contents, you can download a PDF copy for use.
Thanks for your question! Compared to a traditional literature review, evidence summaries follow a systematic approach to reduce bias. It is rigorous and replicable. You can learn more about evidence summaries in our video at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7EW7FnHXw90.htmlfeature=shared
Hi there, please feel free to contact our JBI SUMARI Support Desk with your concern at sumari.jbi.global/support and they will assist with your query as soon as possible.
There was a lot of responsibility placed on the pharmacist to educate hospital staff on a completely new form of medicine which they themselves most likely were not familiar with. If they looked at Australia, England, Canada or the US, I doubt it would have been that easy to palm off all the blame onto the pharmacist without a massive backlash! Why would they chose to look at countries with the smallest vaccine uptakes? Another form of cherry picking & plant seeds in attempt to bypass hospital administration and their duties when it comes to staff education & proper implementation of new procedures.
Hi there, thank you for your comment! Please direct your query to our JBI PACES Support Desk at jbi-global.atlassian.net/servicedesk/customer/portal/3 and they will assist as soon as possible.
The revised JBI critical appraisal tools are at jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools About the new tools: The revised tools have ‘separation’ of questions based on the construct of quality they are related to. This is to support users of the revised critical appraisal tools in determining both a study’s RoB, as well as other validity constructs. Other updates were made to facilitate
The Network newsletter includes latest publications, resources and events. You can also check out the JBI Scoping Review Network website at: jbi.global/scoping-review-network
Hi Dimas, There is no specific minimum number of studied included in a scoping review. However, scoping reviews typically aim to cover a comprehensive range of studies that are relevant to the review questions. The number of studies may vary widely depending on the specific research question and scope of the review.
Worthy to watch for my scoping review. I have a query - Should i include abstract articles for my literature review? I have selected 24 articles for final review and 6 of them are Abstract articles.
Hi Tanvir, Scoping reviews do allow for a broad range of evidence. Conference abstracts as a type of grey literature can be included in a scoping review if they are relevant to your review question and meet your inclusion criteria. Sometimes reviewers might limit it to particular study designs. For example, if the review question is about mapping a concept related to clinical trials, they may only need to include clinical trials.
Please don’t forget emergency veterinary medicine. I feel it gets overlooked, you have to also deal with people and animals suffering in some of the worst ways possible in very emotionally charged situations as well.
