The first trailblazers of American radio astronomy called Green Bank Observatory home over 60 years ago. Today, their legacy is alive and well. Nestled in the mountain ranges and farmland of West Virginia, within the National Quiet Zone, radio astronomers are listening to the remote whispers of the universe, in order to discover answers to our most astounding astronomical questions.
Down the frequency you can pick a certain time and understand it's fluence. Are there any fluence in the frb repeating similarly in other frequencies as well regarding frb121102
Unless you're looking for a near Earth asteroid that is going to crash into the Earth and blow people up in the next 5 years no one cares and most people don't care unless it's going to blow them up or somebody but they care about Ford's going to impact like the global you know food chain or cause them inconvenience in some way if it's going to blow up some Village in Indonesia that don't really make anything that they care about or use or anything and don't affect them they don't give a shit liberals that say they give a shit and act like that but they really don't give a shit most people just don't give a shit anymore the immediate family and what they want and you know they're conveniences in life the only thing they care about space is maybe they like watching Star Trek or the expanse and that's it
I Still don't understand how you Observed and measured their velocity towards each other You say 7mm a day - is that an observed measurement or are you using the same formulas Einstein used to calculate it ??
This is beyond stupid move the damn site to the north or south pole or somewhere no one lives. In the highly congested east coast location affecting millions of people is total BS.
We're they able to save the telescope I want to move there because I want to get away of electromagnetic fields please save the quite zone and the telescope
A short playlist inspired by this video. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tA10XayhSOM.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TgH9KXEQ0YU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XRr1kaXKBsU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fQmn3lzJIZ4.html
There are a lot of folks claiming to bolster the old theory of special relativity. No so many, claiming to bolster the theories of Maxwell. Possibly that is because Maxwell's theories are self evidently true, after more than 150 years of practical development of material products that harness the observable characteristics of Maxwell's work. I mean, if you were to produce a youtube video titled "Double pulsars reinforce Maxwell's theory of electromagnetic force", everyone would look at you like you were strange. Why do we need to bolster Maxwell's theories, especially with highly speculative ideas about things that are far, far away, about which we know very little? Special relativity demands that you consider time and space variable, and yet also entertain the constant "C", the speed of light. Never mind that speed is space divided by time, both of which are apparently variable.
Maxwell's theories are not self-evident, but extremely strong, stronger than Einstein's. The latter, however, includes the so-far strongest-performing theory of gravity, having been inspired as an analogy to Maxwell's theory of classical (non-quantum) electrodynamics. If something is self-evident, it's not physics, but instead something speculative (non-observational) such as mathematics or philosophy or art. Since Popper's philosophical contribution to scientific methodology, it's generally been accepted as a gold standard that a theory must be recognized as falsifiable (and therefore non-self-evident) before it can be recognized as scientific theory.
@@ewqdsacxz765 You are right, I used the wrong term "self evident". What I was talking about is actually all the evidence accumulated since the theory, which is perhaps the opposite of "self evident". It's all the evidence other than the theory itself. The "evidence" of special relativity is contrived mathematics, rather than practical implementations of the theory in the real world. There is nothing made by humans that needs special relativity to work. By stark contrast, nearly everything in the modern world depends on engineers who understand Maxwell's work on electromagnetism. As for "gravity", Einstein's theory is magical. Space and time are variable, yet united by a constant that is a speed. Speed being space divided by time. You can pretend that this makes sense. Many do.
When you look at images of the Vela and Crab Nebula Pulsars, they tell a completely different story. The pulses are actually detected in Xray and Gamma, the same EM signature as lightning strikes. Evidence from Vela and Crab Nebula Pulsars tells the story of an electrical discharge at one pole of the remnant core. From the Xray images it appears that electrons flow into one pole and positrons into the other. The Gamma pulses appear to be a charged particle recombination scenario in which positrons discharge to electrons around the core from a plasmoid hovering above one pole.
Space and time are creations of man, just like the hypothetical neutron stars. Something that has no physical makeup to it cannot be bent or curved. Time dilation actually emerges from the math errors in Einstein's derivations. When those errors are corrected no such time dilation that emerges from the derivations.
THE GREAT TESLA ON EINSTEIN & RELATIVITY "Einstein is a beggar dressed in purple clothes and made king using dazzling mathematics that obscure truth"... "Relativity is a massive deception wrapped in a beautiful mathematical cloak.” "The theory of relativity is a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense." "The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists. Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved." ~Nicola Tesla Tesla's most scathing condemnation of the Marxist charlatan was penned in a 1934 poem entitled 'Olympian Gossip', written to a friend. In the poem, Tesla sarcastically mocks Einstein and calls him a "long haired crank". An excerpt: While listening on my cosmic phone I caught words from the Olympus blown. A newcomer was shown around; That much I could guess, aided by sound. "There's Archimedes with his lever Still busy on problems as ever. Says: matter and force are transmutable And wrong the laws you thought immutable." Too bad, Sir Isaac, they dimmed your renown And turned your great science upside down. Now a long haired crank, Einstein by name, Puts on your high teaching all the blame. Nicola Tesla
Right the newer radio telescopes actually debunk GR and SR in many ways There is no evidence that rotation speed of a pulsar has anything to do with pulse rate. For the core to rotate at the speed of a dental drill, is ridiculous. Pulsars are detected with Gamma, which is also the same EM signature of lightning strikes. These pulsars should be detectable from all angles, not rotating like a light house. There is evidence from images of Vela and Crab Nebula Pulsars that there is an electrical discharge between the remnant core and a plasmoid that forms above one of the poles of the remnant core.
Do you have to spend a lot of time/effort in future proofing? I'd imagine that as the number of wireless signals increase, as well as their strength, youd have to plan 10+ years ahead, possibly even work in conjunction with IETF.
