My name is Jameel. I'm a Canadian-based photographer and content creator who has a passion for capturing moments. On this channel you will see a mix of street photography, portrait shoots, landscape photography and product reviews/unboxings. If you enjoy this sort of content, hit that subscribe button... and don't forget… ‘The best gear is the gear you have, and the best shots are the ones you take.’
Check out my website: www.milmidstudios.com
Affiliates: Use my promo code: MILMID at www.dehancer.com for 10% off your next purchase! Buy your next Brevite Bag with my affiliate link! www.brevite.co/?rfsn=7416328.39724b
Kit List: Main Camera: Leica M11-P Content Camera: Canon EOS R3 POV Cam: DJI Osmo Pocket 3 Audio: DJI/Rode Wireless Go II & Zoom H4N
I am surprised that this photo has not been challenged by the photography community, for instance who shoots at 1/8000, f1.6 unknown ISO doing that type photography. The 1/8000 the ISO would be between 500 - 800, tell me why a profession photographer who would have those stupid settings; something fishy going on😬😬☹
Hey Jameel, my name is Johnny and I'm a freelance logo designer, currently I'm looking for more works, do you love to have a logo for your channel's branding to have a memorable graphic based monogram logo to help your audience recognise and follow your channel easier? I would love to design a photography themed logo inspired by your direction for you! Let me know if you interested to make it happen! :-)
Trump just posted the Doug Mills photo as evidence, claiming the streak is a blood stained bullet right after piercing his ear. His right hand was on the podium when he 1st reacted. In the photo it is halfway to his ear. That took a minmum of .4 seconds. Wouldn't the bullet have travelled @ 1000 feet past him in that timeframe?
When I do protest or demonstration photography, I usually use a Lumix GH6 with a Panasonic-Leica 12-60 lens, although I sometimes use a Pan-Leica 25 or 42.5. When I need to be discreet, I may use a point-and-shoot camera like a Panasonic LX10 or a Fuji X-30.
@@RVNmedic You ask a valid question! In my recent video I replicate his settings while trying to recreate a similar photograph. His settings are plausible in my opinion. With it being a bright day coupled with him shooting wide open at f1.6, he would be required to jack up his shutter speed to balance his exposure. His colleague Evan Vucci was shooting a 24-70 and a 70-200. Both were shot at f2.8 and his shutter settings were at 1/4000. So I guess the better question would be why he was shooting wide open! Thanks for the comment 🎯📸💯
The photo was faked in Photoshop. From the minor reduction in elevation from the video images, he STILL should have captured people behind Trump in the stands. And in THAT direction at that time, the sky was partly obscured with grey overcast clouds in the distance. The faked blue sky background serves to allow the "bullet" to be seen. And the last time I went to a political event to capture an image of someone speaking at the podium, I didn't need, or even consider, to shoot at 1/8000th of a second.
Appreciate your skepticism, Mark. I for one do not believe the photo was photoshopped for a few reasons. Doug Mills works for the New York Times, which is a well-known left leaning publication that consistently endorses Democrat candidates. For the publication to photoshop the image to make Trump look like a victim, wouldn’t make much political sense. Secondly, the image was taken at 24mm. The one shown in this video was HEAVILY cropped. So the section of the sky in the cropped image may not include the overcast clouds you mentioned. Finally, his exposure settings… I just released a video where I expose similarly to Doug and it is plausible that those were his settings. If it was a sunny day with harsh light and he was shooting wide open at f1.6, he would need to have a high shutter speed to balance his exposure. Obviously this is just my opinion. I appreciate your comment regardless 🎯📸💯
@@MilmidStudios For me there are just too many coincidences. He just happened to be shooting what he knew would be a stationary subject at 1/8000 at F1.6 on a harsh back lit day. And nobody that I am aware of has mentioned the ISO and it's not listed in the settings shown. He just happens to hit the shutter for a whatever number burst of images before he even knew a bullet was flying. He just happened to capture the bullet even before Trump knew it whizzed by him. I just find it very fishy in these manners. I would love to see the raw file.
This photo stinks like hell. I know that is possible to take photo from a flying bullet but anyone with common sense can see trough (try it). Beside if you take a look to the photo, the writing on Trump's cap that is ain't no 1/8000.
I recently bought an R3 for about £3,800 and was doubting my decision with the R1 coming out. After seeing the announcement I can't see myself "upgrading".
April 1st came late this year. Absolutely no reason to shoot this scene at those settings. The data displayed look more like a "word" document than an exif layout. Good ol photoshop!
I still don’t understand why his shutter speed was 1/8000 sec. That’s not a shutter speed you would normally ever use for anything other than high-speed sports. Even shooting at f/1.6 you wouldn’t normally be at 1/8000.
Big up again brother, the more I think about it I'm gonna keep my R3 instead of getting the R1. Thank you again man for reminding me how great of a camera the R3 really is!!!
Hey! I think your question is valid. In my opinion the reason he shot at 1/8000 is because he was also shooting wide open at f/1.6 on a bright sunny day. In order to keep exposure balanced I think his only option would be to jack up the shutter speed, or use a VND filter. I’m sure he was also shooting at native ISO. Just my two cents 💯📸🙏🏽
@@MilmidStudios I totally get it and understand the numbers, but at an outdoor speaking "rally" event? f/1.6 at 1/8000 just doesn't make sense unless I am expecting something VERY fast to fly by lol. I just got done covering 12 high school graduations this year, these are "speaking events", f/1.4 lens at 1/1000 tops, and certainly NOT 30 FPS!...I wasn't expecting a bullet lol. Unless this is protocol for these types of events because of THAT possibly???
@@danc3746 I do appreciate the skepticism and I think we should practice more of it. Let’s just say I HOPE you aren’t right! I want to try recreate the photograph… stay tuned📸🎯
@@MilmidStudios Thanks and please understand I am not trying to start trouble, I just don't understand the settings he was in for that type of event. I guess he had one camera with those settings just in case something like that happens...who knows lol
Why such a high shutterspeed? Because he could. I guess that he wanted a wide open f and didn’t cared about the shutterspeed. Guess a photo journalist does not necessarily use grey filters.
Besides some of the smart-ass comments, Doug got incredible photos. It reminds me of the photo when Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald with a Nikon S, a rangefinder film camera. You know, one shot at a time. He shot the photo 1/65th of a second after another photographer took a picture showing only Ruby holding the and Oswald just standing. That difference made all the difference in the world. The one who shot with the old Nikon got the photo and because famous for it. The other guy just vanished as it was not picked up for publications. Timing is part of it, being there and firing away has to help. I shot a lot of photos while working on USAF base newspapers. I got a few good shots of sports, etc., but nothing like this shot. This is why I love photojournalism and love still photography over videography, not that one is better than the other, but I just love stills. It's a slice in time permanently recorded on film or a hard drive somewhere.
Loved everything about your comment! Thanks for the refresher on Jack Ruby. I agree with your sentiments on photojournalism and still photography. Beautifully articulated 👏👏👏
@@MilmidStudios Thanks for the kind words. Photojournalism means a lot to me. The people who go out where it may be dangerous grabbing photos and videos leaves me in awe. Most people will never see these guys or think of how they are also in the line of fire taking photos. Thanks for the video.
This is a fake photo , reason 1: no photographer would have set his camera 8000 th of a second on manaul , 2: the ISO speed was never stated . And 3: its imoppible to record a bullet in a still photo due to its high velocity
The exposure triangle lets you pick 2 of the 3 parts of the formula and let the third be whatever it takes to get the right amount of light. So if you want a wide open aperture and a low iso you can adjust the shutter speed to get the EV you want, and on bright days you can easily get to 1/8000 with fast lenses and you'll get great shots with no motion blur for most things. I do this all the time at the zoo, it just depends on how much light there is.
