This RU-vid channel is all about filmmaking and photography and the gear that goes with it. Expect everything from camera and lens reviews to short horror films. www.patreon.com/user?u=32199660
@8:16 200-800 at 800/9 has shallower DOF than 500/4. 0.32 vs 0.38 m for subject distance 25 m. Get PhotoPills and check yourself if you don't believe it
I live in Florida near the beaches. Will salt in the air ruin the motor over time? Might even erode the rail system inside and ruin the smoothness of it. Our white soft sand will probably get in it too when the wind blows.
I watched this video with great interest, but I don't completely agree with the conclusions. I'll start by saying that I'm not a professional photographer but a nature photography enthusiast, so I don't necessarily have to have 97% of the shots in focus or perfect because that's not my job. Also for this reason I didn't want to spend exaggerated amounts to buy the equipment but at the same time I'm not a person who is satisfied because I still want to get the best possible photos. So I made a somewhat atypical choice: I bought a Sony A7RIII which is among the best in terms of photographic noise and at the same time the 42 Mpx sensor allows for a notable crop and as lenses I bought two Russian telephoto lenses, Rubinar, 500 mm F5.6 (525 mm real) and 1000 mm F10 (1070 mm real) both catadioptric. The sharpness is good, they are extremely light and compact (1.3 kg and 1.9 kg), and the brightness in relation to the focal length is good. I spent 200 euros for the first and 300 euros for the second. They are both only manual as for focusing. I'm seeing that in the end I always and only use the 1000 mm. With a good technique I can in fact obtain with the 1000 mm about 15% of perfectly focused photos with birds in flight and about 30% of photos that if, in post production, I zoomed out up to a maximum of 50% (so as if I took them with a 500mm) they come back perfect. I shoot bursts at maximum shutter speed, short ones moving around the focus point, so almost always when I aim and take some good photos it always works. With animals on the tree/ground, using the magnification that mirrorless cameras allow, the percentage of perfect photos is 80-90%. In fact, the point not covered in this video is precisely the following: it is true that with F10 compared to F5.6 I obtain noisier photos (but in any case with the A7RIII the noise is often very acceptable), but it is also true that I can then act in two ways if a photo is not perfectly focused or a little too noisy: in post production zoom it out a little until it becomes perfect again. I often only scale them down by 25%, so as if I were using an 750 mm, if it goes badly, by 50%, but in any case if it goes badly it is as when it goes well if I were using my 500 mm F5.6, in all other cases I get much larger photos with more detail. This is the reason why I practically never use the 500 mm, unless I take photos after sunset or on super cloudy days or if I think I will find animals too close for an 1000 mm. Regarding the bokeh: the 5.6 mm is not always better, often the 1000 mm brings the subject so close to the background that it is much better with the longer focal length. Then clearly the catadioptrics have their own bokeh that is sometimes very artistic and sometimes less so but this is a subjective choice, I normally like it more, but it is precisely a personal taste. Finally: there are programs like DXO that are excellent for noise removal: I always pass my photos first through DXO and then through Raw Therapee to increase their sharpness and the results are really very good, so even the problem of increased noise (but my experience is limited to an A7RIII that starts off with an advantage) is often overcome in this way. Two examples photos with the 1000 mm Rubinar F10: in the evening, very cloudy-black sky, under the trees, distance 40 meters with two Hoopoes fighting quickly, I had to use 1/2000 ISO12800: drive.google.com/file/d/1Wgu1ZIf3kH5AYJjdNT8-kYdVjnQLCGdH/view?usp=sharing or in average sun light but inside the shadow of a tree 1/500 ISO6400, 30 meters: drive.google.com/file/d/1Yb0XrtL7Uy75DCEBJbCoDLIMsx1ljUiq/view?usp=sharing Greetings from Italy to green and beautiful Ireland!
it took them 3 years to release the pocket 3. a pro version would cannibalize their product and defeats the purpose. why don't you ask Cannon or Sony to make a smaller gimbled vlogging camera. that's right they can't. they've tried and failed. ... all we need to do is wait 3 years. they will release something even more fantastic but then you will still wish for more.
Great review, thank you. I was thinking of taking some footage of my bike rides with my pocket 3 and after watching your video, I will definitly give it a go now so thank you.
I knew when I firstr saw this scope online and svbony claims it is doublet APO Spotting scope but i had doubt about it's clarity at higher magnification and chromatic abberations,so i texted svbony that if I found chromatic abberation and colour fringing at higher magnification and low contrast and loss in brightness so I will return this scope and you will have to refuy full money 💰💰 after this they didr not reply and i got to know that this is not what they advertise its a crap do move ahead and buy the best
I'm really glad I discovered this video, and I appreciate you creating it. The drone footage flying over the areas you explored was a highlight for me. I've been considering getting a set of drones in the future to serve as security, possibly triggered by motion sensors to do reconnaissance flights on demand. It's great to see potential locations beforehand if it's helpful. Additionally, I'm curious about where you typically sell your compositions. As an enthusiastic hobbyist, I hope to dedicate more time to improving my skills in capturing great shots.
Could've been way creepier if there was nothing when he moved away the sheet and the lights went off :) Then the view of the house completely dark from the outside.
I have a bmpcc 6k pro and i love the image and interface. What i don’t like is the bulkiness once i rig it out. I do like the form factor of the r5c as a result
I use the pocket 3 for vlogging on my bike every week. I find a wrist strap which is very cheap to buy provides enough stability and allows me to use two hands on the bike handlebars. With my phone mounted on the right hand side I've got full display and use of the mimo app. Mounting directly your bike gives you too much vibration. Although I film mostly at night I have done some some daytime blogs where the quality is excellent.
Can we do colourgrading for my theatre film on this monitor pls say- And Can we also use samsung m7 43 inch 4k monitor for colourgrading work to lowbudget theatre film pls say
NO NO PRO VERSION THIS IS IT AND THE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE CAN AFFORD IT. PRO VERSIONS JUST TAKE FEATURES RHEY ALREADY PROVIDE AND BUMPING UP THE PRICE FOR THE PRO. SNOBBY PROS CAN ALREADY BUY THE 5k $$$ STUFF STAY IN YOUR LANE DUDE
I’ve been a photographer all my life and a professional for 12 years. I just bought the R5 C after my 5DSr got wet from a heavy downpour I was caught it suddenly. The rain went through my camera bag. I thought the camera bag was more water proof and the 5 DSr was well weather sealed. But nope, repair shop says it’s cooked. For the first time in 55 years of owning cameras, this is the first time my camera got damaged from anything. I would say this is the most complicated but highly functional camera, I’ve ever owned. Canon 90D, 6D, 5D Mark IV, R5 C, broken 5DSr. A bunch of EOS red line and regular lenses. No RF lenses. Several DJI drones, GoPro 10 Max.
Many people want to shit on this product but I have never heard a better alternative why is that? If I got $3,000 to spend on a box camera that I want to build up myself (maybe I already got the parts) and I need the box camera to do 6K RAW. Where's the better alternative? That's what I thought. It's like everyone think every single product ever created on Earth was targeted for them to spend their money on. It's hilarious at this point. So. Where can I get a box camera for $3K that does 6K RAW? Please tell me!
