Hi there, Unless I am missing it I don't see one use of the word "should" in the video. That said... even if it does say "should" I would like to point out this product is engineered using the same engineering tools that roads, dams, bridges, etc. are built with. Meaning we are VERY confident in it's quality and ability to last. We are constantly performing testing while producing to ensure the product meets and exceeds our customers expectations. We could design the product to last 100+ years but the reality is the economics do not make sense in the agriculture industry for this type of product. Therefore, we designed Feedlot Compacted Concrete using the most economical local materials and install practices for the customer to get the best ROI for their project, which is typically a 20 year life span design with ROI's in as little as 1 year depending on feedlot conditions and other factors. With over 8 million sq ft of RCC produced in the last 3 years we know this product extremely well and know how it will last and perform.

@@bonhomiecement6208 Like I said, the word "should" is used a lot. If you're missing that you must be watching a different video. Thanks for spending all that time to attempt to defend your product, like any good salesman trying to make their story true.

@@farmcentralohio hmm ok well I guess we are seeing different things. At the end of the day all that matters is the science and the third party testing... not opinions. Over 10 straight years and tens of thousands of third party testing we have never failed a test. We are happy to sit down with any of our customers to show them this test data and help them make an educated decision. Best of luck to you