Did you have flirtation devices on the children flying over the water. Sorry your wife’s opinion and desires doesn’t count either you Music would have been nice
This pilot is a jerk. Everyone especially children should be on O2 over 12,000 for 30 min. As a pilot you are responsible for all folks on your plane. I would not fly with him he sure does not understand severe turbulence. Totally about himself
The CFRs require that flight crew be provided with and use supplemental oxygen after 30 minutes of exposure to cabin pressure altitudes between 12,500 and 14,000 feet and immediately on exposure to cabin pressure altitudes above 14,000 feet. Every occupant of the aircraft must be provided with supplemental oxygen at cabin pressure altitudes above 15,000 feet.
Reminds me of all the dinner flights my late dad used to us on back in the ‘70’s in a 210. I believe it was a J model with the left rear bucket seat door similar to yours. N12PC
Straight main gear legs,gear doors - takes me back to the memory of the ‘60 model that was used as a training and cargo hack at the little airport in NC where I did a lot of growing up.
I spent a large part of my childhood flying around Florida in my grandparents 210G N6855R. She came off the assembly line just a few weeks after yours. You don’t see a lot of 210 G’s anymore. Great airplanes.
Paul, I really like you set up. We are looking to re-do a 210 as well. Would you be willing to share a list of dash components and hours/money spent installing them?
Paul. That woman of yours is a super MOM! She lets you fly your family in your airplane, and she takes care of your most prized possessions while you get to chase your passion. Don’t know her name, but when my son was that little, I had to give up flying until he was a teenager. You are a very luck man!!
Actually hypoxemia is defined as o2 sat of <92 percent in which organs start to deteriorate unless supplemental o2 is given, reference USMLE STEP 1 2020. 94 percent o2 sat is still good.
@@bryanadriano88 correct, kinda. The science is the same everywhere but protocols are not. The goal is to be proactive not reactive. And they shouldn’t wait for their sats to drop that low if they can start supplemental O2 at <94% as required by my states protocols (TN) and my previous states protocols (PA). The point is they don’t need to keep it at 100%. And doing so could give them a false sense of security. For instance if they get CO poisoning one of the best ways to self asses is by O2 sat. Unless they want to spend $1K to buy a C0-Oximeter which would show COHgb levels. If you’re short of breath and at 100% O2 with other common symptoms of CO poisoning such as headaches, nausea, irritability, no fever associated with symptoms, history of exposure to something like an exhaust leak, multiple patients with similar complaints. At that point they could turn up their O2 to as close to 100% O2 they could get while telling ATC of their possible exposure so they can have EMS waiting to bring them to the appropriate hospital or MEDEVAC if possible since I can call MEDEVAC for that due to transport times.
@@zachschaneberger for protocol's sake well said. It does get more complicated than that when you have people who have normal values at 94 or 93 percent, naturally lung funtion decreases with age post 30 years old, unless a smoker or with previous lung disease in which the decline is steeper, lets say a 45 year old person, known smoker with underlying lung disease, it would be normal for him to have an o2 sat of close to 92 or 93 percent, as you have stated people must o2 supplement at an o2sat of 94, that means o2 supplementation from the getco aka taking off upto landing the aircraft, as per protocol's sake.
I installed all the Avionics myself including making new panels and only paid for the cost of the units. Installed all the engine monitor sensors that came with the garmin eis. The plane is 1967 T210G.
Amazing panel! What did that cost to upgrade, or did you buy the aircraft with it already installed? Also, Did you make a video of you explaining to your wife why she and the kids aren’t going to die or spend the rest of their lives licking the windows on the short bus?
Lmao all the Lexus fan boys in the comments are mad they disliked the video because an older car with a smaller engine and less gearing advantage still managed to whoop some new Lexus ass lmao
from a dig my bet goes to the Lexus. the is350 with Michelin pss tires, a good launch and a good driver can easily do 0-60 in 4.5 seconds or better. here are two examples of the is350 achieving 0-60 in around 4.1 to 4.3 seconds. get a stopwatch and time it bmw fanboys. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UYspYhk-roo.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lMitqui4ESE.html
Best part was at :52 when the driver of the m3 looked like he slammed a gear.... Its a SMG. But yes these 2 are to far apart to compare. Reliable grocery getter sedan vs iffy reliability coupe meant to handle the back roads. But still love the both of them.
is350 is not a grocery getter. Thats what the es350 is for. come on dude quarter mile low 13's aint a grocery getter. the car barley even has room for any groceries in the back seat lol.
I've run against a few newer M3's in my '09 is350 F-Sport. Off the line I can keep up for a bit - overall the BMW is always a little faster, but they actually run together pretty nicely. With intake/exhaust/headers/dropped suspension, and carbon fiber wheels I'd guess I've shaved 50lb and have about 350hp. I think it's also geared lower than the BMW, so off the line with TC off, it's damn fast.
mike: LOL@ISF being an M5 competitor. This is the older generation 333 HP M3. The ISF was a competitor to the E90 M3 that made 414 HP. Around the race track, M3 always won.
Mark Dorchester yeah sure ...thats why half the videos posted up on RU-vid ,the m5 lose .I'm a BMw fanatic but I'm sure you're not familiar with the ISF. They don't get the engine check light like how we do when we drive it hard.
JAW TAPPER I feel you bro. Lexus only gets sporty when get into the F sport. Lexus isnt a slow car by any means but a normal lexus just cant beat a sporty car.
Isf has higher top speed than m3. Lexus lfa will destroy bmw m6 is every department meant. The only thing bmw has on lexus is it's SUV or SAV's however u fancy
chillinxxpaki69 you arent to bright....I can tell by the way you spell, type and talk about something completely different..Not going to waste my time going back and forth with you...
Fuckin wicked I love your sleeper. Im definitely going to swap the M54 rotating assembly into the m50 and eventually get the gt35 kit on there. How much compression would you have with a .14'' head gasket?
