Only outside of the seignorial tenures. Mixed marriages occurred mainly within the domiciled communities of the Hurons, Mohawks, and Abenaki. Then, with the fur trade out west, there was mixing,; hence the Métis Nation. The majority of French Canadians have no, if not minute, indigenous DNA. This is the reality of the make-up.

I agree! From an exegesis of the Sagas, indications are given on how to reach Vinland. One route to the West leads inland and another to the South brings directly to "Vineland the Good". This shows that the direct route from Leif's Camp to Vineland was to follow the coast down. In one description of sailing West, a high fall is described which fits the likes of Montmorency Falls by Quebec City. To the Vikings, the St. Lawrence would have been the most awesome fjord ever encountered. Something hinting at the Otherworld. At the height of Quebec and Île d'Orléans chestnuts and vines do grow plenty. This would have qualified it as the northern region of Vineland the Good and Hop which was probably (according to the description, no snow that winter, etcetera) the estuary of the Hudson River. Old maps do show Winelandia Promontorium as Long Island.

Many American rune stones are but copies of Scandinavian sites. There are not that many in fact. Greenlanders, much like the Icelanders had a strong contingent of Celts, Saxons, and Franks with them. In light of this, there is an entire set of cryptic symbols that these peoples shared. These were mainly astronomical and geographical indicators... Quite normal for mariners.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 What evidence is there that the Greenlanders had any Celts, Saxons, and Franks with them?

@@markaxworthy2508 The sagas and Catholic Annals mention some by name... The DNA of Icelanders. And the habit of bringing captives and mercenaries during the raids. Much of the woman population in Iceland was Celtic.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 It is certainly true that the Icelanders had some other DNA in their make up as a result of their raiding, but that is not what you wrote: You posted that they "had a strong contingent of Celts, Saxons, and Franks with them." This implies that there were consolidated, self-identifying bodies of these peoples in Greenland. To the best of my knowledge, this was NOT true and it was this that I was disputing.

@@markaxworthy2508 The Norse and Danish crowns competed for a while until they were Christianized and in vassalage to the Frankish king. The Lowlands were also part of this league ruled maily by the Danes.

When the data does not fit the narrative or when politics get in the way, all hell breaks loose in the "hackademic" circles. One very annoying tactic is to try to convince the public that they are protecting the indigenous peoples as if they are children. NewZealand skeletons in the cupboard is an opener. Celtic DNA with the Maori is quite a surprise indeed!

The clips are from documentary and Holywood films. These are actors,.The credits are at the end of this video.

There is also a common affliction with French Canadians that of painful fist cramps because of the long rowing ventures of the Vikings. Perche in Normandy was where the best carpenters were recruited. Shipbuilding inherited from their Norse ancestors was maintained well after the time of William the Conqueror who depended on the skills of the Percheron for his formidable fleet. These skills will be put to use for the colonizing of the St. Lawrence. New France was in fact the last westerly expansion of the Norman League. And much like their Viking ancestors, because of their valor, rose to the title of Jarl (Earl) or Seigneur in French. Boucher is another interesting figure in Giffard’s entourage, that is, one Pierre Boucher. On the first of February 1634, Giffard paid Gaspar Boucher a visit at his homestead on the outskirts of Mortagne, Perche, Normandy, where he told him of his project to recruit good and able men and women to settle in Canada. Gaspar and his wife, Nicole Lomer, had a twelve-year-old son named Pierre along with younger children that could not be left behind, Nicolas, Marie, and Marguerite. In 1667, when Boucher was still governor of Trois-Rivières and Lord of Sainte-Marie, as a true Percheron Norman, he took to the wilderness in what was to become Boucherville and what was then called Îles Percées. As we have seen in the previous section, the term ville in Norman parlance meant “seignorial domain.” This move was accepted by both the governor Rémy De Courcelle and the Marquis De Tracy. Now forty-five, his daughter Marie, marries army officer René Gauthier who takes command of Trois-Rivières, thus freeing him from these duties. His objective is now to create the ideal seignory. For this, he would have to recruit the best people being both disciplined and flexible. He does indeed find such people, for in April of 1673, he hands out property titles and concessions to thirty-seven tenants. It took only fifteen years for this settlement to become the New France standard as planned with Colbert. We know, from the 1681 census, that this estate had grown into a bustling community. According to Gédéon De Catalogne, its inhabitants were the most prosperous of the Montreal government. The Boucher family has left a considerable descendence in all of North America. And, as Brisay De Denonville wrote in a letter to Colbert: “this family has the most worked for the betterment of the colony having neglected nothing necessary to its advancement, The father was of the first founders of the colony under Monsieur D’Avaugour Dubois. Considered by your regretted noble father, he was for a length of time governor of Trois-Rivières. His seignory is one of the country’s finest.”

That's absolutely not true, I have no idea where you got that information from, but it is false.

LOL. That's a good one. What, did your sister tell you that?

....except the Indians. Fixed it for you.

No, we don't. Some people don't even know that Vikings came to what is now Canada at all. In Canada, most of us learn that the Vikings came to Canada around 1000 CE and established a settlement in Newfoundland. I, and most people, have never heard of Vikings having long houses on the St. Lawrence or Great Lakes.

Thats right! It is easier to accept Viking incursions up the Saint Lawrence than to report a UFO sighting.

Absolutely, but in both cases you should provide evidence, not just "looks, here are jumbles random carvings, hence vikings!"

Bien dit! Vous m'en apprenez une bonne au sujet du rocher percé. Cette légende est-elle tirée d'une des deux sagas qui relate des voyages Norois au Nouveau Monde? Yvon H. Couture auteur de deux bouquins sur les Vikings au Canada saurait peut-être répondre? Ceci étant dit, la présence de runes un peu partout ne semble pas le fait de joueurs de tours « vikingophiles ».

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 Non, c'est une légende racontée dans le bas du fleuve et en Gaspésie, Je ne crois pas qu'elle existe en écrit ou qu'elle provienne de Scandinavie. Je la compte avec les légendes du bas du fleuve. Il est quand même surprenant que tant de Gaspésiens aient les yeux bleus, fait attribué aux Allemands qui visitaient les villageoises à partir de leurs sous-marins durant la guerre... Quoi qu'il en soit, les Européens ont laissé une marque profonde dans notre beau pays en s'en appropriant. ⚓

That is because you were not there to see for yourself. Right, the Mount Pinnacle petroglyphs do not look like runes.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 It has nothing to do with being there. The shape of the carvings does not magically change shape when I'm there. The petroglyphs on the Indian Rock of Potton are not runes. The only similarity with runes is that they are made of straight lines. That doesn't make them runes. Again, looking vaguely like something doesn't not make them that something. This goes for everything. The famous devils tower roch in the US looks a little bit vaguely like a tree stump. So nutcases now claim that in fact it IS a tree stump and that giants roamed the earth thousands of years ago. Complete and utter nonsense. Don't fall for that sort of thinking. And you even interpret a triangle as a W. In no runic alphabet is there a triangle as a character. Does not exist. Complete and utter nonsense. And nothing on that stone looks like Icelandic bind runes. The Jones farm stone also are clearly not runes. You interpret the first two lines as an L, because it's an angle. But it looks nothing like an L rune. Not every two lines that has an angle to them is an L rune. An L rune has a vertical staff and a short downward sloping branch on the top. These are two long, non straight, non-vertical lines. You could just as well claim that the inscription is latin and it sais TINXFI-FA. That makes just as much sense. Also, you claim it's a standing stone. How big is it? And how big are the carvings? If that's a standing stone, those carvings need to be huge, and again, that just never happened. It's simply not runes. Also, I can't find any reference to this stone anywhere else, and no pictures of it. And again, the carvings on Mount Pinacle has no previous mention anywhere. And if those were real, wouldn't somebody have mentioned them except you? Why has nobody even looked at them? There's tons and tons of writings about the Kensington Runestone, which is a completely obvious fake, but these ones? That's extremely suspicious. Also, if you really think those carvings are a thousand years old, why the heck are you drawing in them? You are destroying evidence. The first carving you are showing would say "rainaro" and then the two last runes are illegible, nothing looks like that, unless there are some unusual dalecarlian runes, but that's evidence of Swedes, not vikings. 😀 And "rainaro" makes no sense in old norse. The snake carving is upside down. But ok, lol. And it also doesn't make sense. Several of the runes are Dalecarlian, and then it would say "å?io komkro" which also is nonsense, and the k runes are backwards, so, no. Definitely not vikings, that's for sure.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 And of course, my long explanation and debunk of your claims no longer shows up. Yay, RU-vid.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 OK, I'll try again, a bit shorter this time. The Indian Rock of Potton does not have anything that even resembles runes on it. Anyone that claims that are seeing things that isn't there. The second rock you show, that you have no photograph of, appears in no other records or mentions, in English of French outside this video. The carvings does not in any way at all resemble runes. A bunch of random lines, does not make a runic inscription. The last carvings you show that you say are from Mont Pinacle again does not appear to be mentioned anywhere else, in French or English. Those do look like runes, yes, but unintelligible. They do not make sense, and aren't consistent with any known variant of the futhark.

@@RegebroRepairs The standing stone has Younger Futhark on it. You can disagree. I can suggest a book for you, it's titled "Vikings in America" by Gordon Campbell. It explains how everything runic in America is bogus.

Thank you so dearly for these amazing details. Indeed, academia is very quick to debunk anything Viking outside of one site in Newfoundland. One expert, the Swedish runologist, prof. Henrick Williams has found no proof of authentic runes in North America. Bold statement! Thousands of Greenlanders took refuge south of James Bay during the Little Ice Age and they had their own set of runes. And of course, they would have left written statements for those to find them. Many made their way back to Europe thanks to the Basques. A Cree ethnographer from Canada called Bernard Assiniwi uncovered an Iroquoian-Norse pidgin of no less than a hundred words. How can the experts poopoo this away?

All the "runic inscriptions" in North America have been debunked. Every single one of them. And it's also notable that Vikings NEVER made any markings to document their travels. That simply never happened.

All the Oklahoma "rune" carvings have been debunked, every single one of them. And the story you tell is probably a mistelling of the text on the Kensington Runestone; whoever told you that misremembered some details, including where the stone was (not Oklahoma). It is an obvious fake, made as a joke by a Swedish farmer in the late 1800's.

@@RegebroRepairs The sites you mention have nothing to do with those I refer to. Also, I am probably the first to leak this into the Anglosphere since for the most part this was mainly published in the local French media. There we no Swedish farmers in this neck of the woods.

​@@boutetmichelgerald1634 I replied to Rebecca, and she mentioned them. Try reading the context before replying.

Les Camiré sont une une des anciennes familles de Victoriaville, c'est certain! Lors de mes études à Dijon, j'ai pu visiter la Franche-Comté qui jadis faisait partie de.la Bourgogne. Pendant la colonisation, beaucoup de compagnons furent recrutés dans cette région, incluant le Morvan. Je pense faire une deuxième vidéo sur les lignées maternelles directes. On trouve souvent de petites perles en remontant du côté des femmes.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 Descendants d’un faux saunier, passés par la Beauce, je crois même qu’une Camiré fut la première descendante européenne née et décédée à St-Joseph ou Ste-Marie je suis pas certain. Merci, bonnes recherches.

@@mikec1195 Un certain Jean-Baptiste Camiré ou Comiré s'est installé à St-Joseph vers 1786 puis a marié Marie-Ursule Nadeau en 1787 ( voir lien: www.nosorigines.qc.ca/GenealogieQuebec.aspx?genealogie=Camire_Jean-Baptiste&pid=1116401 ).

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 Sur ce site ma lignée c’est celle-là: Nicolas-Vincent-Jacques-Jacques-Jacques-Pierre-Albert-Mon père-Moi. Ma tante a beaucoup de photos de cette famille.

Try a DNA test!

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 already my friend, blood types came from The highlands, the french and prussia mixed with Ojibway and plains cree.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 photo and government letters of my families names in the wars as generals as well. Trust me, i know what im talking about. Otherwise i wouldnt have commented.

@@DezrinB So what are your haplogroups and percentages?

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 I’d have to look around the mail as its been a few years but french and highlands were in the higher percentage but Native american blood type being the most dominant. My grandpa came with the first European boats to America. Which than met my Prairie cree “michif” woman grandma.

100% right! The Acadian colony moved from one crown to another on many occasions. There was also Irish. The Thomas family was from Limerick Ireland and the Granger and Melançon were from England. The Mi'qmaqs were instrumental in keeping the Acadians safe from Lawrence and his Bostonian hotheads. My ancestor col. John Handfield was morally broken by these awful events. The funny thing is that I have Acadian ancestry with all four of my grandparents, but unfortunately no Mi'qmaq. The Mi'qmaq are an amazing people.

Thanks for leaving a comment... You are so right about this lack of info. I have noticed that when there is mention of the major waves of immigration there is rarely mention of the French, let alone French Canadians. The French-Indian wars probably had a big impact on the American mind. My maternal grandfather was from Fall River Mass and I went to grade school there when I was a child. They always grouped us with the Irish, so forget the French.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 I have Norman/Irish heritage on both sides. The name I carry Wall is originally DuValle via a Norman knightly family only anglicized later in Ireland. On my maternal side we have French Canadian ancestry. My Grandmothers Grandmother was a DeShaw. Her father was born in Quebec. All the DeShaws I'm aware of were from upper New York, St Lawrence area. They later migrated to Iowa in the 1850's. I assume looking for good farming land. Irish/French grouped together= Enemies of the Crown... I found about a very small group of French descendants in Missouri that still speak a dialect called PawPaw. Its barely hanging on but some folks are making an effort to preserve and promote it. Are you aware of any "Folk Healers" in the area today ?

@@WallAirts Folk Healers are recognized when they are born in rural families. They call it "un don", a gift. One thing noticeable about Western Europeans is that they are for the most a mix of Celtic and Germanic. In western France and the British Isles it can tip on either side. French Canadians are mainly Norman, Breton, Gallic (Poitou), and Frankish (Ile de France). The Normans controlled most of these territories at one time. The Duke of Normandy was as powerful as most of the Crowns of Europe. There is Norman and Norse ancestry in us all. One of my ancestors was Col. John Handfield of the House of Hauteville. He descended from one of Rollo's companions, a certain Ivar Magnusson, first Earl of Hauteville. His two grandsons crossed the Channel with William the Conqueror. One was Emeric (Somerset) and my ancestor was Raoul who settled in Kent. After the Acadian Deportation, John settled at his wife's estate near Dublin in Ireland. His wife was of Breton-Norman descent, a Winniet. Concerning Missouri, this region was part of a third colony called "Les Illinois". The legend of Paul Bunnion comes from the French folktale of Ptit' Jean and the Bull. An avatar of the Gallic God Esus. As with Louisiana, they are trying to rekindle the local French Patois (Pawpaw). Louisiana French is now very alive and the CODOFIL is hoping to have the State join the OIF, "Organisation Internationale Francophone". The most notable part of our social history is that French Canada was structured on the Norman seignorial system. This made us the only feudal society in America. My mother's family is mostly of Norman seignorial and Breton naval ancestry. In final, the Norman moto: Viriliter et Sapienter, "With courage and wisdom".

​@@boutetmichelgerald1634 So much to learn.. I've read that Maine & New Hampshire have the highest % of French descent by population in the US. Folk healing.. The Pennsylvania Germans have maintained their traditional healing ways known as Braucherei and Hexerei, aka Pow-wow. I've started looking into Folk healing traditions from the Appalachian & Ozark mountains. There appear to be some French influence but I need to dig deeper. "With courage and wisdom". Thats one to remember..

@@WallAirts The Germans and the French were close neighbours. The norhteastern Provinces of Alzace and Lorraine kept changing crowns. Many of the Hessian soldiers after the War of Independance married into French Canadian seignorial families.

Bennett Family of Quebec The first Bennetts in the Quebec records mainly settled in the Lower St. Lawrence at Rimouski. Other members of the family are also found in the Gaspé Peninsula Rivière-du-Loup and Quebec City. Bennet, Joseph, Occupation : Labourer Born around 1810 Reference: registre paroissial de St-Germain de Rimouski - 1833-1847 - feuillet 102 - Il s'est fait baptiser deux jours avant leur mariage, soit le 10 janvier 1836 à St-Germain de Rimouski Died on the 18 of September aged 80 in the Parish of St. Stanislas Champlain Lower Canada Extra Notes : His parents were from Cornwall County, England - Legitimate spouse in 2nd marriage to Catherine Maguire His other marriage : Banville, Genviève Born: 31 August 1816 at Rimouski Lower Canada Died at Rivière-du-Loup: 23 September 1854 - aged 38 God-parents: Jean Heppell and Geneviève Canuel At the wedding : Joseph 26 yrs old & Genevieve 19 yrs old 12 January 1836 Rimouski (St-Germain Cathedral), Lower Canada Ref: Drouin Collection - Rimouski (Cathédrale St-Germain) - 1836 - Page 3 M.2 Parents : Bennett, Trescowthick Philip, and Elizabeth ? Married to: McGuire, also spelled Maguire, Catherine Date of birth: 1815 Country of birth: England Died in Montreal, St. Stanislas Parish: 04 September 1890 - aged 75 Note: her parents were declared to reside in Limerick, Ireland Her other marriage to: Mitchell, James Date of Birth: 1815 Country of birth: England Date of death unknown Notes: At the marriage, the parents are declared to reside in Sligo County, Ireland. James is given as a resident of Shefford in the Eastern Loyalist Townships of Lower Canada Place and date : Catherine 28 yrs old & James 28 yrs old 30 June 1843 Montréal, Notre-Dame Basilica, Lower Canada Daughter of McGuire, Farrell, and Sarah ? Place and date of marriage: Joseph 46 yrs old & Catherine 41 yrs old 02 September 1856 Québec City, Saint Patrick, Lower Canada

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 oh my gosh, thank you sir! I wish I could shake your hand, thank you again.

@@PaganLad3121 My pleasure! Now I hope that you can go further up your tree into the ramifications of the family ties.

Bone idée! Rares sont les gens qui connaissent la vielle société canadienne de l'époque seigneuriale; un monde féodal dans l'Amérique post-coloniale.

Hi Jean! I guess we were lucky to have these photos. I always find it tragic when people say that they lost all of their precious family documents in a house fire. Unfortunately, National Geographic has stopped issuing DNA tests. What you need to look for are those who give the Y and Mt haplogroups; this way you can work up your family tree to find which ancestor carried the gene. For the direct female lineage, one needs to work from daughter to mother up the tree until the earliest entry. So for Adrien St-Aubin, you can go down the tree onto your generation. There is a site called Francogene where the haplogroups of many of the founding couples for French Canada are given. Good luck in your ancestral quest!

Spanish linguists transcribe the hard C as K. However, using the old script, the transliteration should be expressed as Ca/ga; Co/go/Cu/gu, and so on. Cu is also good for Old Celtic such as Goidelic, Gallic, and Celtiberian; cu "dog", genitive cunos, plural cunes. The adjective cun-os/-a/-on for "high, lofty, elevated" can also appear following context. The Old Celtic adjective Batar-os/-a/-on meant dizzy, scatterbrained. As you know, should not be confused with the Latin battuo, batuo, v. "to strike, fight", or French bâtard, "bastard".

Right so it Fascinates me man that our Translations are similar and actually Endovelicus, Aendovelicus, Aendobelix is associated with Hounds he's a fire deity of Iberia and Portugal Ireland has Aodh , Gaul Grannus & Hinduism Agniloka if we count every region I suppose if Son Daughter or even young was used from Celtiberian one might even say Son of Hounds and fire indicating The celtic fire God and his association with a father God like Dagda or Sucellas or Taranis etc very interesting. And the other ideas as well you mentioned are very neat. Do you have a hypothesis of what happened to the Early Eurpean settlers? Was history of the America's Re-written great video

@@CelticDruidTempleOfBeliefs Firstly, on the topic of Pre-Columbian Old-World / New-World contacts, there is much speculation, but no hard archaeological evidence. Skeptics here have a field day! Although artifacts are uncovered here and there, these finds are casually explained away as modern-day plants. Then there are the very strange artifacts that seem to defy all logic; these include the Michigan Relics and Burrows Cave stone tablets. If you wish to read more on these collections, I posted several papers on Academia. Just Google in my name (same as for this channel) along with Burrows Cave. I know that the Mormons are on the trail of this research and have hounded most of the possible American sites for Old World contact. If you research Zarahemla for videos, you will find them on RU-vid. Another good source is the Ancient American magazine. As for me, whilst I have been on the Irish and Breton connection for decades, I have also been looking into the Vikings. We do have this hard evidence lacking for other Old-World visitations. Secondly, the mention of the Lusitanian theonym Endovelicus / Endovellicus which José Leite de Vasconcelos has explained as a Gallo-Vasconian name stemming from the prefix ande- and radical vellicos for “very good”, hence punning with vailos “wolf”, needs explaining. That the name is Celtic, is not for debate, this said, Endovelicus is the Latinized rendering of the Old-Celtic Edouellicos / Indouellicos “the extreme circle, the utmost ring”, the Cosmos, deified, which can be explained as follows: endo- / indo-; endon, “end, ultimate”, with uelicos / ellicos < uaelicos, “circle”, uelicon / uellicon, “ring”. Accordingly, the name also lends itself to a few bardic puns:”, endobellicos / endouollicos, “the dim, somber”.; adj uolic-os/-a/-on, “flabby, slack”; the wolf was ualos, coalescing with uailos / uallos, uolcos / ulcos; and ualos authority, competence, strength”.

@boutetmichelgerald1634 great extra information and yeah I been seeing things popping up to that others are saying is celtic in the America's but like you said there's still people ignoring it

@boutetmichelgerald1634 where can I read about that topic of José Leite de Vasconcelos did he talk about other deities from Iberia and Portugal as well is there any books I'm always looking for information

Only when the French ventured outside from the "seigneuries" such as did the fur traders or "coureurs des bois". Then, during the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries for the colonizing of the Saguenay, Upper St. Maurice, and Abitibi regions, there were mixed marriages. The DNA results are clear. Native American ancestry shows up mainly from outside of the traditional tenure settlements of the Saint-Lwrence Valley. If your family has indigenous DNA, then it shows that they moved out from seignorial insularity. A good majority of French Canadians of Lawrentian Quebec have little or no native ancestry. I am 100% French Canadian and mainly of seignorial descent and have no native DNA. This picture is not different from that of the Anglo Americans who generally claim to have Cherokee ancestry.

Van 📯 🐐 Hainault, I know...

Just Bogman!

Merci Cynthia pour avoir laissé un commentaire.

The African way of life? ...Indo-European = Eurasian, and not African; It goes back to the Yamana culture of the Pontic Steppes (ca. 4000 to 3000 BCE). Egypt is another ballgame altogether.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 so obviously u KNOW my point, ur just avoiding it. Nuff said. B1.

The point is that the Druids and the Rishis of Vedic India share in the same origins. @@donttell2289

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 and ur going to tell me MY point? While still avoiding it. U obviously are either a liar, or have no clue what thier real origins are. Nice attempt at deflection, though.

Insults do not make for an argument. Uidia and Vidya are Indo-European cognates that stand for wisdom... You bring no facts to back your "African origins" argument point blank.@@donttell2289

Merci M. Sabourin! Effectivement, Nos Ancêtres est une excellente référence.

Many go to the usual DNA tests like Ancestry. However, my suggestion is Francogene. I did mine by the National Geographic Society, but they no longer offer tests. One thing is sure, most Acadians and other French Canadians' results give a Western European origin... Same as for the British Isles.

Very interesting indeed! Mt D is quite widespread in Eurasia and is found in the Caucasus, China, and Japan. It spreads also into Central Europe and France. Your French family name looks like Louineau which is common in Canada. Here is what can be found online on the Franciscan Canadian Missions in Corea: Franciscan Missionaries of Canada in Korea Seoul, September 27, 2007 ( Apic ) The Franciscans celebrated their 70 years of presence on South Korean territory, indicates the Misna Agency. The first two Franciscan monks arrived on the Korean peninsula in 1937 from Canada and founded the first Franciscan community in Daejeon in 1938. Twenty years after their arrival, the brothers built a leprosarium - which they still administer today - in Gyeongsangnam province (300 km south of Seoul). This leprosarium currently accommodates more than 200 patients. The presence of brothers has increased thanks to local vocations: in 1987, the Order of Friars Minor established the Korean Province which today includes nearly 150 faithful and contributed to the “Ad Gentes” mission. by sending brothers to China, Israel, Japan, Russia and Kazakhstan. A new area of focus for the Franciscan community in Korea in spiritual assistance is that of immigrants (especially Filipinos), who represent an increasingly important part of Korean society and experience problems of cultural adaptation, logistical, and spiritual orientation facilities. ( apic /misna/ pr ) © International Catholic Press Agency ( apic ), 09.27.2007

The term Dema, from the Old Celtic root *dedma, is found in the ancient Gallic epigraphy of the Vichy France region. So it isn't mime per se. Anyone with linguistic training can stumble upon it. For my research, I stay clear of Wikipedia since not very trustworthy. My impression is that others do the same.

This law of justice, rite, and moral ethic was the foundational principle of social order in Indo-European societies. What was called Dharma was also known as Themis by the ancient Greeks; that is, Law and Justice deified. In vir veritas!

Thanks! Indeed, the Indo-Europeans were Monist and not Monotheist as some would want us to believe. The unified Triple-headed Godhead with its hypostases very well demonstrates it. They missed the fact that polytheism is an ordered construct. Good point!

Thank you for the link. This Trimurti was also an integral part of the ancient Indo-European theological explanation which was at the base of not only Hinduism, but also Druidism, and Greek Trinitism. Indeed, Druidism was from Dru-Uidiia, aka Dhru Vidya in Sanskrit. The philosophy of these Rishis (< dRishi = druuui "true seer") originated from the northern stars and numbered seven: the Seven Sages of Greece, the Roman Septentriones, the Celtic Sextandirio, and of course, the Saptarishi.

@@boutetmichelgerald1634 It was a surprise for me to see this connection.