I'm hoping so. It's near the board area so I feel like it is... But knowing Nintendo would they really do secret boards anymore? It's not 2000's anymore where they were fun.

@@RoanRahl Craftopia proves that I'm right.

@@aerrae5608 I can't agree to you kind of agree with you on a point but the problem being at the end of the day because they're both based in Japan I'm just gonna say look up the bare minimum of copyright laws in Japan and yeah as long as it's maintained for at least once every 20 years you basically can own a person in Japan and they have no legal right to defend themselves not quite slavery but d*** near, To the point where Nintendo has actively sued other companies for something as simple as a joystick on a screen surface I'm dead serious this was something they sued a company for, The biggest thing out of all this though I doubt they're going to be able to financially cripple pocket pair enough to stop them from saying coming to America at which point all they have to do is set app their system through the American legal system and they are basically fine like they could literally take the game ported as long as there's no like complete destruction of it hell at that point all they do is don't release in Japan make it unavailable in Japan which then they can really re-release palworld and there's nothing anyone can do about it

@@xaviergould8747 Japan is a pitifully sized market anyways. If Nintendo wins they will doom themselves cause angry Palworld fans will find ANY way to give pocketpair more money. Nintendo cannot win no matter what they do. Japan has no market power. Anime has already become world wide, they can't control it anymore, not the well known ones at least. If Nintendo wins, I'll buy 10 copies of Palworld for anyone, I'll buy ANY DLC they make, and I'll give them as much as my money as possible. Because Pokemon sucks and it's Nintendo's fault for not pimp slapping Gamfreak into shape.

😂

The whole video is him glazing Nintendo and bashing on pocketapair

I hope Nintendo wins because it'll be funny.

@@superretrou6776 Not half as funny as seeing how much the Nintendo Defense Force would be seething at Nintendo getting humbled.

Biased

@@rosevee34 Yep, I'm a Nintendo fanboy. I don't care about Pokemon either though.🤷

Couldn’t agree more. I’m a diehard Pokemon fan and even I think this guy is working in bad faith. Palworld shows a lot more promise than current Pokemon games and I think this guy is baiting people. He even has a follow up video trying to stoke the flames more. I wouldn’t bother watching this guy’s stuff anymore. He’s like Verlisify trying to get rage clicks.

My point of stating that, was that the creators of Palworld couldn't be more original and had to take so many elements from Nintendo IPs which objectively lacks creativity on their part. I mean just the Pals mechanics with how you catch them in a ball and how the catching mechanic looks with the ball shaking and either being successful or not, having to fight them, throwing them out of your ball to fight alongside you, of course as I mentioned the clear copying of how similar many Pals look to Pokemon, I mean c'mon, I think you're the one with a bias towards Palworld on this one, my friend. Nintendo wouldn't pursue a lawsuit if they had no grounds for it. That alone proves that there most certainly are infringements, and the game devs of Palworld just come across as lazy.

It's not about what has promise or not. It's not about opinion (my OPINION is that I would hope Pokemon would be more than it has been and even performance issues alone has been a serious problem), it's about stating objective facts (like it or not, the Palworld devs were lazy and lifted a lot from Nintendo IPs instead of trying to be more original and create something more uniquely individual). Also, your comment proves you've never seen my stuff before, because I do not bait for rage clicks, that is just a stupid thing for you to say. Just because you disagree with me, does not mean that is what I am doing. Get a grip. Most of my Channel is merely Nintendo News and Guides. This was News that I presented with the fact that Nintendo has a track record of winning these lawsuits (because it is their legal right, like it or not), and that Palworld HAS taken A LOT from Nintendo IPs that are WAY too similar in many ways. Like honestly, how on earth am I baiting when the title and thumbnail are simply what is being reported, which is that NINTENDO IS SUING THE PALWORLD CREATORS? Like, do you actually think before you type, man?

@@JSkeletonNintendo I’m not arguing that Nintendo has no legal grounds for this lawsuit. I’m saying it’s not fair to dismiss Palworld as completely unoriginal. Yes, you’re right, it DOES do a lot like Pokemon… while also doing a hundred other things that Pokemon doesn’t. Again, real-time combat, survival, and tycoon elements are what help separate it from Pokemon despite their commonalities. By your logic, Pokemon is a ripoff of Shin Megami Tensei because they’re both about finding creatures and taking them to use for battle. Nothing is truly 100% original. Persona lifted from Final Fantasy lifted from Dragon Quest lifted from Dungeons and Dragons. If Nintendo didn’t legally have a patent for their mechanics, you wouldn’t feel this way. I’m sure you understand the basic concepts of inspiration and iteration. Palworld is exactly that while admittedly flying too close to the sun in some aspects. You’re allowed to acknowledge what Palworld does right while thinking it overstepped in some ways. It’s not healthy to view everything as black and white.

@@JSkeletonNintendo Well when you respond to people with “Cope” when they make valid arguments, it gives it all away. It’s the oldest troll trick in the book. Verlisify does the same thing to get views and engagement. You’re just like him.

Do what you will. "The way you're carrying yourself" Lol. I mean, so sorry you feel offended by 1. Me defending myself from trolls who try to discredit what I say and 2. By stating the whether someone likes Palworld or not, the objective facts are that they absolutely lacked uniqueness and creativity and copied a TON from Nintendo making their game pretty unoriginal in many ways, while SOME limited originality in other ways.

@@JSkeletonNintendo If "trolls" is what you want to call people stating their opinion in the comment section on a controversial subject, then by all means.

LOL no, not stating their opinion. Trolls are people who have nothing valuable to contribute to a civil convo besides "you're just a dumb biased fanboy." Do you think before you type?

​@@sear9993he's very sensitive I found I've been pissing him and his fans off for the last 12 hours, it's been kinda fun they don't even know about the international monopoly laws that stop people from legally trademarking and patenting basic design concepts lol

How does protecting their own IPs and implementing rules that are their right, make them "greedy"? You may dislike it, but it doesn't make them "greedy" I mean, if they were greedy as you say, their business practices would be more akin to the majority of the rest of the gaming industry who has sacrificed fun, wholesome, creative ingenuity for $$$ (not the Devs fault often times, as most of other companies are run by suits that are out of touch with gamers and gaming in general but nonetheless).

@@JSkeletonNintendo I mean you pretty much just described Nintendo in a nutshell my man.

@@JSkeletonNintendo Ah so Nintendo did not resell retro games on every new console with a digital store? Oh yes and of course Nintendo online is still totally free right? Wait... Oh oh I know! You can still use the GTS to freely trade and battle anyone in Pokemon whenever you wa-... Nope. Oh man, I don't think they're that benevolent chief.

It doesn't matter if it's a starter company or a multi-million dollar company, they have the rights to protect their IPs; doesn't matter if you like or dislike that, the fact of the matter is it IS their right.

LOL I'm a hater? hahaha. Cope buddy. What makes me a hater? Defending myself from trolls? Stating objective truths about the game that they absolutely lifted a ton from Nintendo IPs instead of focusing on being more unique? Sheesh. Get a grip man, it ain't that serious. Some of you are acting like I just dissed your Mom or something with this game. You can like it if you want, I could care less. But fact of the matter is they still ripped a lot from Nintendo IPs and Nintendo has the right to pursue them legally whether you like it or not. It's not about my opinion because my opinion one way or the other does not change the facts of the matter, just like anyone else's opinion does not change anything.

The only people who wanted this game are casuals who never played Pokémon.

@@superretrou6776 pokemon is the literal the most casual game as you would put it it's babies first rpg

@@xaviergould8747 And yet the casuals who play Palworld never played Pokémon. They just complain about Pokémon.

@@superretrou6776 no most people just find pokemon boring after beating like 5 times in less then a year

@@superretrou6776 your calling people casuals when your talking about a game made for children my dude just because your playing a popular game doesn't make it darksouls or anything speaking of which that's a good rpg

Designs were a point of the fact that the creators of Palworld lifted a lot from Nintendo, some that has legal warrant and some that does not. The point being, the creators should have tried to come up with something a bit more original, than trying to take so many 1 for 1 ideas from Nintendo.

LOL You're the fanboy here (of Palworld). If Nintendo didn't have a case, they wouldn't be pursuing it. The fact they DO have a case, proves that Palworld has overstepped, and the fact is, Palworld objectively lacks much individuality and uniqueness and rips off so much from Pokemon and Breath of the Wild. Cope harder.

@@JSkeletonNintendo PCGGC is correct, your view is obiously subjective. Repeating "Cope Harder" will fail you and all of your followers, turn it around and do better. Ninetendo needs to think about their audience more and not just their audience's wallets or who they try to sue.

I see nothing stated to prove my view is subjective. This is not about liking or disliking the game, you're free to drool over the game if you want to. My point is the fact they lacked a lot of originality, I mean that's just objectively true. They lifted so much from Nintendo IPs it's crazy. The ONLY reason this game was such a hit, is because it was in the direction of what people wanted from modern Pokemon.

@@JSkeletonNintendo So does Genshin Impact. I'm not sure what your point is?

@@JSkeletonNintendo buddy buddy, no need to be mad about being a fanboy, there are medical treatments out there that can help yo-ACTUALLY, your hopeless owo

Please...LOL Palworld practically copies designs (and much else) that isn't just mirroring real life animals. Be objective about this. Sheesh...

@@JSkeletonNintendo tells someone to be objective with a completely unobjective and biased response lol

@@JSkeletonNintendo You objectively can't be objective about this subject. Sure, there ARE pals that look like Pokemon, but I don't think any of them look similar enough to warrant a lawsuit. Even if they did, though it might not be legal, it sure as hell is moral since Nintendo is such a greedy company. That being said, I have my opinion and you have yours. And judging by the like to dislike ratio, mine is the more popular one.

1. The lawsuit isn't about Pals looking like Pokemon, my point in stating that is the fact that the creators lack originality and unique creativity; that said, there are COUNTLESS Pals that look VERY CLOSE to Pokemon and you'd have to be blind to say otherwise. 2. Nintendo has patents (which is what this lawsuit is about), as well as other things such as copyrights, trademarks, etc. and they have full right to protect those ownerships however they see fit from a legal standpoint, whether you like that or not. Popular opinion does not equate to objectivity btw. People are mad because they so badly want what Nintendo has not made, and because they want it so bad, they don't care if another game it does infringe on the rights of another company (Nintendo in this case) and are angry at anyone standing in the way of that. Same thing with when Nintendo shut down mods and shutdown tournaments that were not official; Nintendo had the RIGHT to do that, and people were all mad about it. I'm not even stating whether I agree or disagree, I'm merely stating it IS OBJECTIVELY Nintendo's RIGHT to do these things WHETHER people like it or not. You can't even logically explain HOW Nintendo is greedy besides you spewing all this anger at the fact they shut down things you liked. That doesn't make them greedy, that just means they want to control what they create and what belongs to them which is in their rights. There are PLENTY of immensely greedy companies in the gaming industry, and Nintendo has been one of the few who have been the opposite of what we've often seen in the industry. Like man, when Iwata was still President of Nintendo, he even took a pay cut so he could avoid letting employees go, and yet you can't open social media now days without seeing all these companies (Bungie, RIOT, PlayStation, Xbox, etc.) talking about the hundreds to THOUSANDS of employees they're laying off.

@@JSkeletonNintendo Whether or not it is objective that Nintendo has the right to take down Palworld is a decision for the courts to make. Nintendo took down about 20 years-worth of mods on GMod. Surely some dinky little mods wouldn't cost Nintendo that much money. I could also criticize their stance on emulators. I can agree with not wanting people emulating modern switch games, but games from 2001 that you are no longer even selling or providing any medium to play them? Come on. Side note: I never said there weren't other greedy companies.

Bro he doesn't care he's one of those weird white knights of the company's had for the like the last almost a year now he's basically sitting there saying you can't say anything about it about the billion dollar company, All a minute I've kind of been sitting here for the last 12 hours pissing him and his fans off and fans pokemon on honestly I don't mind the franchise but it's too basic for me at this point, 28 years old and yeah video games get kind of boring when it's literally been the same one repeated for the last better part of what 2 decades now, Also nice job bringing up the mega evolution thing with digimon I'm actually a bit more of a fan of days of digimon still

its funny to me the last Pokemon game came out and had more problems then a game with less of a team on a engine they've only just started with

dude he's stuttering the whole video I think he's nervous this could backfire hard

Considering they went from 1M players to 18K currently active players, yeah I'd say they died off pretty hard. OBVIOUSLY they aren't COMPLETELY dead at literally 0 players, it's relatively speaking, but you knew that and just wanted to try and be all smart.