My ideas have changed since my previous comments. I am now thinking resistance is restricting the number of lanes, current to be representing the lane number and for speed to be important but is decided on by three factors potential difference, current and resistance. It means amperes is not electrons per second, but my alternative is likewise affected by voltage changes. It is making sense to me at the moment. I am still enjoying your videos. Thank you.
My suggestion is I think supported by the way larger numbers of rows of electrons in a magnet tend to have a greater influence. If we simply look at the amount of work electricity is capable of then flow rate in this perspective is less influential compared with electron lane number.
Informative and clearly expressed, many thanks. I am finding it a little hard to believe a current for a series circuit would be the same through a high resistance as an LED. My impression is a resistor causes electrons to form more lanes which have a greater influence. Could it be possible to regard a current in terms of the number of lanes or rows of electrons rather than simply the flow rate? A high resistance could then be like deep mud for electrons compared with a nice straight road.
use 2 superconductors each making same sinewave. Use iron to let them run in sync. Let one only power something small, the other attach to a hanging antenna that does not touch ground. See what happens when you run them inductively with what the one powers through a cap. The cap breaks potential. The freq's run in phase, oh and make the entire system of wiring ferrous metal even though contacts aren't. Last but not least; mount chips on ceramic. Freq's you experiment with. use carrier.
