170

thanks

It doesn’t have a turbo and it’s a heavy AWD car. It’s not supposed to fast. Well done for the sarcastic comment.

@@oddities-whatnot Yes its AWD, no its not a "heavy" car. Even the E92 M3 is a few hundred pounds heavier than it. The 2021 manual awd model literally weighs 3117lb. The two door E92 M3 is about 3600. For reference, the 2025 M5 (4 door sedan) weighs 5390lb. Now that's a heavy car. This subaru you're seeing is as light as they get, especially for a damn crossover, hence why the blazingly fast acceleration.

YUP LOL, Kinda miss that car!

Yeah lol my aunt has one and I love it. Cobb tuned makes just under 300 hp

0-60 mph isn't the same as 0-100kph

Dual mass flywheel is why

Sti in junk yard with a blown up ej 😂

what you got?

those are an opt in. you turn them on yourself. you can set the rev limit with or without a beep

Rx is faster

😪😪

CRF 250L

The ECU determined how much PSI someone gets depending on many variables. Just because someone else hits 12 regularly doesn’t mean everyone else does as well. The reason the WRX took so much longer is also because he needed a 3 shift to hit 60.

@@postalpancho so why would the ECU decide to give lower psi? Doesnt that mean its not reaching max torque/power?

The current gen is simply that slow! I drove one and I was amazed how mild it was.

meanwhile gr corolla builds up to around 25 psi

I've hit 13.3 PSI on multiple occasions so 12 should be easily achievable.

Check out videos on their new cvt. I hate cvts but the new one seems to have great performance, until it breaks ofc.

Ya OK...

Pretty much. Timing with a stop watch or even using video frames is so far disconnected and flawed from what a timing device like a dragy measures.

Ive seen dragy and gr corolla does like 6.1 lol

jsut gearing and the rev limit being at 6k. may on youtube with a tune that changed rev limit to 6.5 or 7k they are in the 4s stock with limit changed only

My buddy has one, I tried it and I was amazed how mild it was. It felt like any other new car out there. Very disappointing.

@@garboi8976 lol

Yeah , despite of cylinder less but it's not necessary for more cylinder be a good performance !

@@mbiny obviously not; it’ll still smoke most v6s and keep up with most v8s

No that is not quick. 40k for a 6s + to 60??? Even an old E60 M5 would do 4.7s to 60 for about half the price.

@@user-wm3fc1sk1p We're talking about a 1.6 3 cylinder engine and you're trying to compare it to a 5.0L V10 engine. You're actually incompetent.

@@madloudnoises Turns out one has a turbo and one is naturally aspirated😲 Apparently for every 1 atmospheric pressure (which is around 14psi), you essentially double the amount of air going into the cylinder. Effectively doubling the "displacement" of the engine. Turns out that 3cyl engine is running at about 26psi out of the box. 26/14psi= 1.85. This effectively makes the physically 1.6l engine run at an "EFFECTIVE" 4.56L displacement. Basically one engine is over a decade newer and whilst running at 91.2% of the displacement its only actually making 300HP vs 507HP. Well as you can see it actually turns out that YOU are the incompetent one.

​@user-wm3fc1sk1p the Subaru did it in 6+, not the Corolla.