j'ai du monter un spitfire au 1/72 dans les années 70, maintenant ça serait plutot au 1/48 , je pense que c'est un minimum pour avoir un résultat correct et un minimum de détails ; un avion mythique , pour moi le plus beau et le plus élégant de la seconde guerre mondiale ; j'ai remarqué que selon les modèles l'hélice a trois ou quatre pales
Bravo Magnifique. But what music did you use at the beginning of this video? You can't find it with Shazam or the 4 copyrighted songs! Please , I want it !!!!
Greetings from Australia, if that is tbe standard of model building your ard turning out sie, p,ease consider yourself as having another subscrber, that was a fantastic build of a very iconis WWII aircraft, best regards from Australia.
Think I'll try that overall oil wash to bring out the panel lines on my next build. That seemed to work real well. I've been adding the lines individually using a Tamiya product, which works, but I like this effect you've produces. Well done......Also like your showing the problem with the wing. I've never had a build that went completely correctly. Something has always gone wrong, and it's how you meet these challenges that makes the hobby a lot of fun.
@@creatologiescalemodel1848 It's easy to remember: "Red, Right, Return" it means if you see the green on the left and red on the right at night, you know it's returning to you. But a microscopic easy-fix on a masterpiece of your work
Good job! Just 3 remarks: 1) it's a pity though you built a canopy closed model not to insert a seat belts set. 2) no weathering on roundels is shown, despite a general worn appearance 3) unless you wanted to represent a land based plane, tires look too dusty for an air carrier aircraft.