🐉 Welcome to SENZUPOP - Your Ultimate Destination for Dragon Ball Super Card Gaming and Beyond! 🐉
🚀Join me on an epic journey through the world of Dragon Ball Super Card Game! This channel is a haven for all Dragon Ball enthusiasts and card game aficionados. Here, we delve into the exciting universe of Dragon Ball and the strategic gameplay of the Dragon Ball Super Card Game.
🔥 Card Battles Galore: Witness intense and exhilarating Dragon Ball Super Card Game battles as I showcase my absymal skills, strategies, and deck-building prowess. Whether you're a seasoned player or just starting out, there's something here for everyone I hope.... XD
🎮 Gameplay Tips and Tricks: Elevate your gameplay with insightful tips and tricks. Learn the art of deck construction, master the game mechanics, and stay updated on the latest set releases and updates.
Okey new idea, just in case if u read this. The new set 26 yellow gohan cards, 2 of them the sr 5 cost gohan and the 8 drop ss2 one is soooo soo good in this deck. Just put every single 1 drop caulifla in the deck (4 copy ofc). Play as defensive as you can , 4 nimbus , bardock 4 copy , some teq card like the promo majin vegeta or great ape baby etc. Ofc play 4 copy both of the 4 drops kale and 3 both keflas, and 3 gohan both of them. So the plan is that you just play a defensive game until t3. Hopefully now you have a barcok (floodgate) on your board so you play the 5 drop gohan for 2 and now is the insaine part , rest the bardock with the gohan, since bardock auto says if u rest him draw a card so draw. then attack twice play 2 1 drop caulifal search again and again then for 1 energy play the 8 drop gohan attack , annnnd at the end of the turn play another 1 drop and search again :D
Best video I’ve seen on how to play the game! Thank you! Thank you for explaining everything, every other video I’ve watched they just assume I know the lingo lol
Do you think that glowing cards are going to be the SRs? I saw like 2 or 3 per pack, so getting SR will be easier in Digital than irl 😮 nice! I hope you're right
Hi SENZUPOP, question: do you still play with this deck and have you tried the deck with the new cards? Final form of everlasting darkness en garlic jr. eternal time? Would love to hear your opinion about it? :)
5:45 I would like to point out that you are supposed to double sleeve dragonshields by inserting the card a 3rd of the way, then slip you finger inside the sleeve and push the card in with friction the rest of the way.
You’re welcome! I’m glad I got you excited to give the deck a go. As mentioned, it takes a little while to get used to the sequencing but it’s a fun deck and it does a lot.
From all the list and videos I have seen on the new kefla lead. Your list is the one I think resonates the best with the leader and its how I play it. I would consider maybe including time magic, to stop things from restanding. I also like to have the generic zextra card, later in the game kales rampage does not bring that much value since the zlead has the effect on swing and the zextra can be a life saviour and the amount of zenergy this deck can produce it's a very good defensive tool 🙌 also mono yellow is the way, there is very little value by adding blue apart from senzu
I mean, you also get Kelfa Super Powered Hindrance, a great early game card. You get some versatility as well. I truly believe multicolor can fit in the deck
So i removed the 1 drop kale , for me its useless. Put 2 m vegeta promo in it for against u7 goku, and ofc for board clear.i use the you are number one scr but the gohan piccolo is better. I still use 3 different sc 2 kefla 1 zamasu and 1 krilin. And 2 vegito instead of robotic. The rest is kinda the same as yours.
I think the 1 drop kale is such a good card. If you have not watch it, you can check out my explanation on how the card does a lot for the deck and how it can also deal with U7 Goku.
@@senzupop i dont know, i played this deck our last local and have 3 1 drop kale in my deck and i find her unusefull , literally dosen't use her a single time. 10 caulifla and 8 4 drop kale 2 z battle card kale is enough ( for me at least).
with the 1 drop kale, you can get a +5k for the battle and then setup for a kefla with 0 energy. it's a really really good card if you know how to sequence it.
@@zsolt726Biggest importance for the 1 drop is being able to set up a Kefla on your opponent's turn without taking a damage from one on field if I'm at lower life and don't want to go any lower. It's also free which is big
@@brandonjamesss my deck is so defensive that i dont take any dmg aftert turn 3. So i dont really need to setup kefla for extra def. Also i won our local with this deck.
Just a quick note you mentioned the +10k from Kales Rampage for the turn not being very relevant without a boss monster but if you play a Kefla over the Kale after it swings it will be +10 which can make the 8 drop a 40k double dual 👍
@@senzupop Yep I'm a judge and can confirm. Battle cards placed on top of other cards keep the power boost of the cards underneath. Even when the card says place underneath like Kefla.
Katana sleeves and the dragon shield inner sealable sleeves r all i use... Never liked dragpn shield outer sleeves. They arent terrible but never liked the extra space at the top.
so question. cell about to explode says you have to play a cell perfect resurrection from under it, however it gives you no way to actually have that card under it
I really like untap and how players can learn to have an ettiquette when it comes to playing a card game and whats more proper to avoid confusion in ruling.
If we keep the card for a long time in an album while using this. Do you think there's any chance that the plastic flap on the back might leave a mark on the card?
i am much newer to the game and started with this deck. the way i am playing it is more combos and negates to prolong the game and chose when i take life. i have 4 of each negate and 4 android 18 combo and 4 cell super combo. i don't have the old kamehameha so i am missing that but for most of the early game i take my life when i want. i also don't like the namek absorption even tho you can miss out on the early evolve sometimes turn one you draw so much you can normally find the saiyan.
Bandai lied to the players about the digital client and the excuses they gave are not good but personally I would have not have been this mad about fusion world if they had not said that they are going to physically print it, most likely fusion world is going to cannibalize the masters, having 2 formats splits the player base and the new players from fusion world will most likely want to play fusion world and not masters because of how different it is and fusion wold packs will come with QR codes that you can redeem in the fusion world digital version so you get double the value. All they have to do to is look to Masterduel, for forking the card pool is easy just follow the same Dragon Ball Super masters format. Have them start at set 3 play that for a month release set 4 and use the same banlist that came out with set 4 that killed mechafrieza and banned ss3 and other things and have them keep releasing a new set and the corresponding banlist every month till they catch up the masters format.That would also solve the problem of them not being code all the in at once even though Konami was able to do this with Masterduel it had over 10,000 cards on release and makes it so that the cost to make the game can be spread out and is easier to budget. With the unfriendly mechanic those are all things that exist in both Yugioh and Magic The Gathering they fixed this problem with a clear and defined user interface, player interaction is what makes really good tcgs the only successful tcg with no player interaction is Pokemon. if super had no player interaction it would most likely be awful no counter plays or negates blockers arrival the game would turn into an aggro mirrors and would be determined by a dice roll on who goes first. These complicated systems that have to be programmed can be done, MTG arena and Masterduel were both able to do this. Masterduel made 130 million dollars in 2022 and yugioh is the most complicated card game out there, they made it easy on players to learn and pick up the game with a good series of tutorials. The viewing experience is all down to the user interface and graphics. Bandai can keep the cost down and the profits up by following Konami"s example.
Thanks for the comment but you failed to realize that MTG and YGO are a different beast altogether. DBSCG is too small to justify the investment. Yes, we can do it step by step but it doesn’t negate the fact that it will still be a highly complicated game eventually. Your point on just ban the cards on day one is not well thought through in my opinion. For example Ban ss4 red leader on day one - what do we do with the red cards in the set? - if we release them, then they are not playable on day one. No one will be happy to pull them from the loot boxes. I think Bandai might get into some ethics or legal trouble with that. - if we don’t release the rest of the cards, then we will have a different card pool form physical and digital, resulting in a FORK in product development. - if we don’t release it, then should we design a new leader to replace the ban leader? Then we need to retroactively apply it to the physical game. But since the time of introduction is different, a potential FORK might be unintentionally be resulted if it’s not handled properly. And I can go on… But all these budget and headaches for what? A card game with a small pool of dedicated players but with limited appeal to casual and new players due to its complex gameplay?
@@senzupop You can't dismiss my comparison to MTG and YGO. They are the 2 biggest tcgs in the market and Bandais competition its a fair to compare to. Clearly you did not fully read my previous post because i addressed how to handle the bans and erratas and it was not banning them on day 1 but just to follow masters format its very simple you just follow how master played out red ssa4 gogeata came out in bt18 and was not banned until bt21. so if fusion world make it to bt18 it would be leagle until bt 21 drops. You also keep saying that complicated tcgs are have a limited appeal to new and casual payers which is not true. Casual player don't care about the complexity of the game the just want it to be fun which masters is. All tcgs are inherently complex do to the genre of the game except pokemon because they made it for literal babies to play. Complicated card games don't have to be scary for new people all you have to do is have a good tutorial and a clear and defined user interface. Whats even more funny is that Bandai themselves proved this is possible with the masters format if you go to your app store and search db card game tutorial its a literal app that you can play and learn the game it has a great and has a great user interface. its got 5 million downloads and 4 stars. it also show that bandai already has the knowledge and skills to make this game. Instead they are making a lazy cash grab.
@@trevordewey6335 MTG and YGO can do it doesnt mean DBSCG can. Logan Paul can fly private everytime and everywhere doesnt mean that I can. We are both human but we operate under vastly different baselines and numbers. Bandai might be a bigger company than Konami but Bandai also has a lot of revenue streams. DBSCG is just one of them and most probably not their major one at that. Clearly you did not fully watch my video either. Releasing a product with the intention to ban them later is just disingenuous and bad business practice in general. Imagine releasing cards in the Masters format and telling the players that the card is super powerful so they will ban it in 3 months? We, the players, will not like it. Neither does the new players on the digital client. When it comes to the game design, a great game should be, forth most, easy to pick and play and yet difficult to master. I am not sure about your experience introducing the card game to new players. It is convoluted and too many interactions make it very non-newcomer friendly. As I mentioned (also a topic that I covered in the video), the client is not impossible to make. It is just too high the effort and cost (development, bug, maintenance) and the end reward of making the current small pool of players happy while potentially isolating a huge new players ($$$). They are not lazy. They just make a (better) business decision. The new client is still be behemoth task with high cost and effort associated with it. Unfortunately I think calling it lazy is just a personal feeling of yours and not an objective look at things
In your Fist reply to me you acknowledged that they could make the game and be profitable it they just make it one set at a time. They could make this game for 50 millon dollars. Any video game with the dronball ip sells really well. Draonball fighters, xenoverse2, kakrot, they are bring back budakai and not to metion the moblie games that print money dokkan, db legends. Any video game with that ip prints money. You are still thinking of the revenue stream as just droball tcg, but this is going to be a dragonball branded videogame. So there should not be an issue with the budget. They make lots of money because its one of the most recognizable ip in the world. Clearly you have never played any other tcg because dbs is already one of the easiest to pick up and play. Have you ever tired to play mtg, ygo, cardfight vanguard, weisswarts, Digimon, one-piece, battle spirits, flesh and blood, my hero academia? Where is this easy success cardgame you about but cant name. I keep citing my sources have Dragonball is already one of the easier tcgs to get into. Also they were the ones that it would be too much work to make it, that's why I called them lazy. Even though there was a beta, and the tutorial app. They have literally already done it 2 before. Bandai lies to their players and you defend them, it's silly. Bandai has a reputation of killing their own card games, the reason dragonball was not popular when it released was because of how they handle the Naruto card game and killed it. Yes or no did bandai lie to us about the digital version of masters, clearly yes. Then how can you take bandais excuse as truth.
@@trevordewey6335 Clearly you have never seen my other videos talking about other TCG that i play? It does not require you to watch the video. you just need to see the thumbnails. With all these time you have taken to type these, you could have done a little more research before throwing personal attacks. Also I see that you are pretty much set in your opinion. As such, discussion is no longer productive or required. Appreciate you spending time with the comments. We can agree to disagree.
I really think this is a refreshing view on the whole situation! Thank you for your input into the community! I also think that we are worrying way too much. With your analysis I feel that we shouldn't worry so much. Yes it was a dissappintment but and yes they definitely should have gone for this reveal in another way but crying about it for weeks and months doesn't help us all! We should all be more mature and focus on the game as we did all this time and continue supporting the MASTERS version if we want it to stay alive and maybe grow some day to a stage where we actually get an online client! Fingers crossed!
Love your optimism! That's what I plan on doing which is to continue playing Masters (so excited about yellow in this new set) and when FW comes, I am gonna go in and take a look as well! Hopefully like you said, there occurs a spillover effect and maybe we grow our player base and get an online client as well!!!
i think bandai will kill current card game (faster or later) with end of zenkai series or in the end of another series which will be called masters - because it will give them 1 integral physical and online game which is easier to play for everyone and cheaper to develop - for me its wierd that the same company would keep releasing 2 almost identical games - and i think some part of players will leave when bandai will make such move and bandai will loose money bacause they change current game into one-piece clone // p.s. i'm collector not player i dont care how difficult is dbs cg but if they change design of cards and close current game i will leave too - my wallet will be happy
It’s too early to call. I think DBSCG makes them money. As long as the revenue is growing (slow but growing), they should continue doing it. What I think will kill it will be - players stop playing the game. - FW becomes wildly successful and Masters got dwarfed by it that it’s just better to dedicate all the resources to FW.
Pretty nice video, but there is something that need to be said: All of actions connected with DBS TCG are only made by bandai. They made it complicated, they made stupid effects and do not even support them (like revive - its like a dead keyword, rejuvenation ect). Thats their actions and THEY should take consequences of this actions, not us. Also they promised us some product and then take it aways to give it to other card game. All of this are on them. Thats their fault that they didnt think about digital firiendly game ealier, they promised some product to us and they dont delivered it. Since set 10 I write to bandai that this game is getting to much complicated, every damn survey. What they did with that? They complicated it even more xD They are responsible for all of this and they should take all consequences of it. Clients have right to be angry and feel cheated. They invested their money to this game and bandai just started now program to kill it.
That I have to agree with you. The card game main mechanic was sound but as more and more new mechanics got introduced, the game got way more complex and not new player friendly. I agree with you that if the idea of a digital client was there in the coception of the game, we would have avoided a lot of these complications. However, we as a community and with Bandai have to move on at some time. Bringing the current game digitally is not financially viable. So, I hope you agree, that such a decision has to be done to ensure the digital client has a better chance at succeeding. As Bandai has said that they will continue to support the Masters format, the way it will die is by the actions of the players themselves because they believe that FW will carnibalised Masters. What about showing Bandai that the decision they made is the wrong one that Masters will outlast FW? A good product does not fear inferior competition. I think if we, the player base, are so afraid that many players will leave Masters to play FW and that FW numbers will eventually dwarf and kill Masters. Then deep down in our hearts, we kinda know that Masters is not good enough.
@@senzupop...or we know that bandai can sabotage Masters and do not give much love to it. Look at numbers of erratas, how lately they made bans for gogeta:gt and syn shenron. They lately show they dont know what they are doing or they dont care about this game that much anymore. Or they just can do the same thing to "masters support" like they do with "digital masters" - scrap it. I mean it's hard to support masters system. Players dont have endless money source, they have to invest their money somehow. And when owner of the investment (bandai) tell us that this product (masters) is not investing to their own product (make digital) why investors (players) should? They show their priority, and show how bad they are handling masters system.
I really do not understand your escalation of the matter here. How it is hard to support the masters system when the masters system will remain unchanged? I think you overly estimated how much profit and appeal this DBSCG has. In relation to the player numbers and profit, I think the team at Bandai does quite a good job. Dont get me wrong. They have a lot to improve and I can make an entire video on that topic alone with examples. The main point here is Relativity. Early school atheletes can't achieve a 100m time similar to Olympians doesnt make them bad or dont care about sprinting as a sport.
@@senzupop as you said supporting two games, organise Tournaments, taking care of translation, balance ect. Costs. Budget is limited, people resource too, they can just kill old dbs tcg, by sabotage it or just letting it go just to have more money and people to better take care about fusion worlds. Like new game console comes to market, companies always says they will still support old one, but everybody knows it wont be too long. Also one of it would have digital client. Again metaphore with investment - you are investing your money in some product, but owner of this investment just tell you he would made direct competition to product you are investing and they do not gonna invest money in your product, becasue it would cost too much. Would you worry about that? Hell yeah. Thats kind of disrespect. They could also stick with physical version of masters that could have codes for digital version of fusion worlds. They could co-excist one in physical, one in digital. But right now new one would have digital version and physical version with digital codes and the other would only have physical and direct competition. I dont think they are doing great job lately, medicore at best, but its a matter of opinion I guess. Number of Erratas, supporting cards a lot of times are useless, useless promos, poor meta research, too late decisions, number of print lines goes up, complicating game and adding mechanics they do not care about later. With last cell archetype they show us also they dont even playtest it - one card was totally dead before release ect. Damn they dont even know English and communicating with devs is almost impossible.
Finally someone that bring a good/positive understanding of the decision made by Bandai. I will be honest. At first, I was a bit torn by the announcement because it meant I wouldn't get much of a chance to really understand how the main game works, but after watching so many videos of people play a card game that has been out for 6-7 years I can understand the frustration of how some of the cards and mechanics will be not only difficult to translate. but also hard to combat when so many cards become irrelevant, such as the Bojack leader card you made mention about in the "fork" explanation. My main concern with this is how it will affect the community and the games' potential life span for both ends both casually and competitively. Enough of my rambling, but I appreciate the video and the explanation of how the development and marketing team took this course of action to try and make sure they have a stable game to work with.
thanks yo for the comment! Appreciate the positivity from you too. I think it is easy to say port the game digitally over as it is but even talking about card pool organisation (no coding, no budget), we have already met with some issues to resolve. Your concern is real. But as Bandai said that they will continue to support Masters format, the only way that Masters dies is that the players kill it themselves. And when Fusion World comes, and our players number dwindles because a lot of our players jump ship to play on the digital client, then we have proven that Bandai took the right business decision. Since if Masters is so good, the players should find FW boring and stick to playing Masters. A good product does not need to fear inferior competitions.
I don’t even understand how revive works and you just explained it. This game is fun and I love it but it has a ton of mechanics and some that arent super understood. The new move makes sense and let’s be honest digimon and one piece have out paced DBS. The fact it’s still “alive” is amazing and they are still pushing forward is great. Of all my local stores (7 places) one and half actually sell the cards. Changes need to be made for numerous reasons.
Ya, my locals cannot even pull maybe 5 people for DBSCG and these are TCG players. The IP is strong but game is way too complex to bring in new people. I agree with you that the new move makes a lot of sense. The card game needs to expand it's player base to justify going online and they have to cater to non-tcg players. I think not changing the game is a bad move.
@@senzupop Bro dont even get me started on who shows up...I literally tried to rally one of my locals and the owner tried to help too. He offered free majin vegeta decks and I hosted an open night...ALL people did was come to tell me i should play digimon. lol Appreciate your content Senzupop. Keep on keeping on!
I was expecting the main game would start the first 4 sets for the digital client and try bring in new player by playing the basic game first. Also give veteran players the nogatalic feeling to play the old sets. Also give time for developers to fix the troublesome games mechanics. I guess not ideal to do that. I hope the developers can bring more complex game mechanics back after a year or two of the FW game.
Masterduel has a million different effects that go off that you have to pick which one that goes off first. This happens between both players each turn. Bandai excuse is lazy.
What's the player count and revenue generated from YGO? What's that for DBSCG? Lazy? They arent event the ones to do the coding most probably. They just get the bill.
@@senzupop I have no idea. In the last 30 days MD has had an average of 17k players. Konami is valued at 7 billion. Bandai is valued at 14 billion. Konami can fund a fully functioning online game but Bandai cannot while it’s valued at twice as much as Konami? Come on. Again they are being incredibly dishonest with their excuses
I think it's incredible dishonest here also to look at the valuation of the companies involved to determine the funding. DBSCG is one of the revenue streams for Bandai cooperation and judging from the numbers of players DBSCG have, I would venture a guess that it's also not a major revenue stream at that. YGO in comparison, generates more revenue for Konami in relation to the profit of the company thus they justify more development budget. 17K VS 1K (generous amount currently) daily player average has a very different ROI.
I did just explain how it makes some decks dead on arrival. What do you do with leaders that are banned? Easy. Just release and ban it immediately? What about the cards that comes with the deck itself? Release them but ban the leader so they are unplayable on day one? But players can still pull them but they are useless?
@@senzupop you simply do not put them in a set if they are banned. MD mixes sets I believe and banned stuff isn’t even a possibility to play. If the archetype isn’t playable due to a banned leader then don’t put the cards as possible to pull. This isn’t rocket science. I super successful online client has done it very very well from a game that’s 25+ years old. Bandai is just lazy and wanting to milk us for as much money as they can now. There is no other explanation
It is not close to rocket science but to create a client like that takes a lot of man hours and money. It is also very resource intensive and expensive to maintain. DBSCG does not have the correct numbers (years, player base, profit, budget) as the other card games to pull off something like that.
I kinda like the card aesthetic and design. But the only advantage I guess is the access to the free Magenta negate card and omnidirectional beam. If you think about it, that’s quite a lot!
