The United States Courts provide fair and impartial justice as an independent, co-equal branch of the U.S. government. The work of the federal courts impacts the lives of the American public in many ways: resolving civil, criminal, and bankruptcy disputes; offering jury service as a way to participate in the judicial process, holding naturalization ceremonies; and providing civics education opportunities.
This channel features videos from the federal Judiciary, including the U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center.
Let's talk about set ups in crimes where no one was available in the system of facts to what happened who had experience dealing with the reasons for the difference of business situations dealing with the massive breakdowns to things others like to do because they were forced to be first in discussion leading to those bad examples blames for actions they made up for whatever arrangements of talking about things that others can't get the best answers to like missing persons that happened before hand in the errors to system breakdowns of injustices of using the wrong information to determine facts of false accusations to there work in planning if people use things about positions of no knowledge for years there side of not knowing what professional business environment in bead reports that came from others leaving the scene like hit and run cases
I wish I could have what it takes to be a pretrial services tech. 16 years working w/ the county courthouse, bilingual, bachelor’s degree. I guess im not smart enough
It seems like the Rule of Law no longer applies. I'm just studying for my citizenship tests, and this is very discouraging. The interpretation by these judges does not quite align with my study guide answer: No one is above the law.
Authorized access ultimately comes from the consent of the governed, who give that authorization to the office exercising its governing duties. Authorization is not given to a specific individual to do as they please with it. If leisurely access is what that individual wants, it must be requested and the People must decide whether or not to grant it. The Supreme Court exceeded their jurisdiction in Van Buren and usurped a power reserved for and by the People.
I’m on probation. I’m 43 years old. I have never committed a crime but I got convicted of a crime for using my 1st amendment rights. My probation officer ignores me and pretends I don’t exist. I imagine he knows I’m not at risk of committing a crime. Probation officers do a really good job. Judges and district attorneys are the ones who are out of control and determined to have a 100% conviction rate so they can get re-elected. Thank God for juries. If no jury is present then you will get convicted. Probation officers see this bull all the time. I think judges should be appointed and not elected.
That's not what the law meant when it was written. Nobody understood the law to mean that when it was written. Our Supreme Court changed the meaning of the law. If such decisions stand, the people cannot hold lawmakers accountable for the laws they write. Apparently that's what our Congress wants.
When you have clerks ordering you to remove evidence from the motion you do not have an independent judiciary you have a confined justice system as your manipulating the case before it even starts, and when you have clerks waiting 37 days to order you to remove an order from anothe3r country closing the post office in the United States who is not accepting mail as to the Pandemic, your then manipulating the justice holding off the motion or just dismissing that motion destroying the case, and when you have a clerk's office refusing to file, like Chief Clerk of this court Angela D. Caesar, under 28 U.S. Code § 352 - Review of complaint by chief judge you do not have any independent judiciary as that decision could have and must have come from the Justice itself, as the complaint was against the clerks office for a showing a clerk or two are working for the Lawyerts, which was proven through filings making the clerk's office no better then what was found in 1983 in Illinois when 62 clerks were found guilty of setting up cases and 34 justices working with the justices and the lawyers was a list beyond control with payments to the clerks back in 1983 of $10,000.00 to disrupt a case to get it thrown out, yes the judiciary is as clean as they were and to allow a Judge such as the African in the video to wear a multi color Bow Tie advertizing he is Gay is not showing of independant, it is a showing of disfunction as to the Gay mentality is what was found back in the 70's in the Supreme Court as to being a mentally sick person who belongs in a mental institution, there is no independence in that showing, making the judges to be seen as Bias and Prejudice to the original filings such as the stripping the cases of pictures of injuries in a case, there is no independent justice in any Judiciary as the Judiciary has shown its colors as they are above the Laws of the constitution and will continue to be above the Constitution, as when the House, Congress gave permission to the High C they decided to cut me off, so I have to stop, there is no fair justice as they are people and to believe the appellate court is better, they protect the corruption and dis-allow reality in the courts as to their ways of cleansing the files before they get them.
I see the hard work talked about to success. I too have worked hard, lost family, career etc, but no success. I am praying some day I could be a judge and do the opposite of what I have experienced as well as give back to the community.
