Тёмный
Michele Merlino
Michele Merlino
Michele Merlino
Подписаться
Комментарии
@40173k
@40173k Месяц назад
Pagani Design do an extremely good job with the 1639 and their date window is better. £75 !!! Japanese movement. NH35A. Nothing will scratch that Rolex itch - not even the Steinhart. Thanks for this video.
@thetoolwatch
@thetoolwatch Месяц назад
I've said this elsewhere: I actually prefer the shape of the Steinhart case to that of the Rolex. I like the narrower lugs and crown guards, the flatter case (I have larger wrists), and the more exposed bezel edge. They make a great watch.
@chrisp.5272
@chrisp.5272 Месяц назад
Just get a Steeldive Submariner with the NH35. 👌🏼
@jeremya7299
@jeremya7299 2 месяца назад
I have had my Ocean One for 9 years and I haven’t had a single issue. I am ready for another one.
@randyreynolds1045
@randyreynolds1045 3 месяца назад
The STEINHART is much better❤
@jonharry6293
@jonharry6293 6 месяцев назад
At lease the Rolex does not leak water, my Steinhart ocean one has…….😮
@soulman1419
@soulman1419 Год назад
Value for money steinhart wins all day long .
@carlkim2577
@carlkim2577 Год назад
Which Rolex reference? Thanks.
@litez8459
@litez8459 Год назад
I wish rolex would just sue Steinhart. No creativity amongst brands anymore. Hardly anyone comes with creative/new ideas or designs now.
@فارسلفارسل
@فارسلفارسل 6 месяцев назад
Steinhart the best ❤
@vichardy3504
@vichardy3504 Год назад
I recently purchased the Steinhart Ocean One vintage Military Diver (I think that was the name) while waiting for my number to come up on the Rolex "registry" for the basic no-date version (as pictured). The AD is vague about delivery date, but says 1 to 2 years, maybe. The Steinhart is a 42 and no date (which I like). I have to say this is about my favorite watch now and I'm really wondering if I should spend $9K plus tax on the Rolex.
@soulman1419
@soulman1419 Год назад
Pound for pound the steinheart more value for money.
@achannel127
@achannel127 Год назад
Salve Michele, secondo lei la differenza di qualità tra i due si sente molto?
@mr2bmw
@mr2bmw Год назад
I don't own any of the 2, but the Steinhart looks nicer.
@herrk5651
@herrk5651 Год назад
If I would look at them without knowing anything about watches I'd say the Steinhart is the better proportioned, better looking watch.
@obiyahu8889
@obiyahu8889 3 месяца назад
Right on...I agree 💯😊
@TheFlyrodder68
@TheFlyrodder68 Год назад
It looks like the Steinhart watch is the winner here.
@martin-drt
@martin-drt Год назад
What’s the differences between steinhart ceramic bezel vs aluminium bezel especially in terms of visual/look ? Thanks !
@Dani-mn4qg
@Dani-mn4qg 2 года назад
Avendo posseduti entrambi, la differenza a polso fa la corona. Sullo Steinhart infatti è molto più sporgente e si scavava nel dorso della mano.
@SweetChinMusix
@SweetChinMusix 2 года назад
I have to admit Rolex has made a decent homage to Steinhart
@ahtoh8274
@ahtoh8274 Год назад
🤣🤣🤣
@iOllie
@iOllie 9 месяцев назад
💀😂
@flyingrocket3879
@flyingrocket3879 2 года назад
An 8/10 watch vs a 10/10 watch. Clearly Rolex shell’s out 100,000,000 per year in marketing. So we all fall victim to brain washing. But Steinheart is an amazing micro brand.
@eustab.anas-mann9510
@eustab.anas-mann9510 10 месяцев назад
The Glashütte SeaQ is so much better than a "10/10" Rolex Submariner.
@rodm2895
@rodm2895 2 года назад
ive had the steinhart ocean 39 for over 5 years and its a fantastic watch,never had any issues
@viplivesmatter
@viplivesmatter Год назад
Bracelets is not so flashy, what a pity. Is it possible to change the bracelet?
@EastCoastPGS
@EastCoastPGS Год назад
@@viplivesmatter Yup you can change out the bracelet on the steinhart pretty easy. I have both a rolex sub that I wear on special occasions and a steinhart I wear as a daily watch.
@viplivesmatter
@viplivesmatter Год назад
@@EastCoastPGS very interesting! thanks for answering🙏🏻
@Beck-Stein
@Beck-Stein 2 года назад
Ocean is the older case body. I prefer the newer rolex case with beefier lugs.
@bryanryan4504
@bryanryan4504 2 года назад
I think the quality of look and feel overall the steinhart falls short ..lot of people say the look and feel is almost same. I don't agree.
@ThisIsDavesGarage
@ThisIsDavesGarage 2 года назад
no one says it's the same. I have 3 steinharts, it's not close to a rolex, but it is a damn good watch for only $600 USD and beats every other watch in this price category. It is nearly impossible to find another watch at 39mm or smaller with a SW200 or even SW330. Except maybe C60 38mm. But my CW is still better quality than steinhart. Even NTH is a little better in case finishing. Zelos is good too. But a Ginault or Monta would blow away the Steinhart.
@bryanryan4504
@bryanryan4504 2 года назад
@@ThisIsDavesGarage oh yes I agree w you on ginault and monta and cw ..don't know much about zelos but heard good things Have you ever looked at gevril? They have a few divers (I own 3 of them they're that good) they can be had for 500 and I believe are on the level of a 1500-2000 dollar diver in fit and finish quality.
@retardbusdriver275
@retardbusdriver275 2 года назад
steinhart is almost better
@shaunmackinga5012
@shaunmackinga5012 2 года назад
Bad comparison no date magnification comparison on the sapphire crystal. Nope not good enough. Sorry! Disliked video.
@lenjames
@lenjames 2 года назад
Watch snubs probably fell on the floor with the Rolex next to a simple man's watch...lol
@patricj951
@patricj951 2 года назад
2 months ago I got a Steinhart 39 Ocean blue ceramic. So excellent finish and quality. Yes, it's pretty small on my 17cm/6,7 inch wrist. I would like 42mm version but Steinhart's 50mm straight lug to lug distance will likely be too much.
@davidsonviray1403
@davidsonviray1403 2 года назад
did they update the bezel of the steinhart? because i saw some reviews of this watch it has "ghost bezel"
@jamiehayn
@jamiehayn 2 года назад
Nice, I got the Ocean One 39 Hulk
@KevinSmith-wp9qs
@KevinSmith-wp9qs 3 года назад
This is like comparing a VW Golf with a Porsche 911 Turbo
@MrVaeron
@MrVaeron 3 года назад
No, not really. Actually its like comparing an Audi A4 with a BWM 7, but the A4 only costing as much as a Polo.
@KevinSmith-wp9qs
@KevinSmith-wp9qs 3 года назад
@@MrVaeron The craftsmanship that goes into a Rolex is light years away from Steinhart. Don't believe the hype that the cost is marketing, you are paying for true quality.
@kkrsnn5632
@kkrsnn5632 3 года назад
The Tudor is missing here 😉
@Super3xtr4
@Super3xtr4 3 года назад
That Rolex is a fake.
@rjac001
@rjac001 2 года назад
That's the problem with Rolex too many fakes around
@fvlok
@fvlok 8 месяцев назад
95% of Rolex’s are fake
@patricj951
@patricj951 3 года назад
Thanks for review! I think we can conclude: you get what you pay for, is valid when it comes to Steinhart. And while Rolex is better, you pay far more than what you get. And while I am very interested in Steinhart 39mm "Pepsi"-version I wonder if such a watch makes too much attention in some places. At 1 or 2 meters distance it looks like a Rolex, and a black version is more discrete, I think.
@ClassicalProtestant
@ClassicalProtestant 3 года назад
2 Steinharts...and I’ll be grabbing a 3rd. Not for the price for the QUALITY.
@MrWayneploof
@MrWayneploof 3 года назад
I have a Steinhart ocean one vintage 42 mm i love it. was nice to see the two side by side
@LaberintoAzul
@LaberintoAzul 3 года назад
I'm thinking getting one. What movement has, do you know? Thanks.
@MrWayneploof
@MrWayneploof 3 года назад
@@LaberintoAzul it's ETA 2824-2
@LaberintoAzul
@LaberintoAzul 3 года назад
@@MrWayneploof Thanks , man.
@Daytona89
@Daytona89 3 года назад
Ferrari VS Wheelbarrow
@bernardwadding
@bernardwadding 3 года назад
The Crystal is far more reflective on the steiny, despite the double ar coating. There’s definitely a better quality Crystal used on the Rolex
@Strix06
@Strix06 Год назад
Well yeah. It costs 10k compared to 500 euros.
@maffintono7790
@maffintono7790 3 года назад
If you read this. than GO for the steinhart. The rolex prices is absurd. Its NOT worth for what you get! Sure in a few years you can sell it for more money.. but what does that mean emotionatly? Nothing. I had 6 rolex models. They all got boring. I own a steinheart ocean one. And get the same joy out of it.
@oaoaoas
@oaoaoas 3 года назад
you lie
@maffintono7790
@maffintono7790 3 года назад
@@oaoaoas why you think that...?
@saddiqjeelani563
@saddiqjeelani563 2 года назад
@@oaoaoas expensive does not mean better.
@robbiecleighmarks3088
@robbiecleighmarks3088 4 года назад
Hey nice review buddy, I love my steiny gmt pepsi.
@imranbecks
@imranbecks 4 года назад
I have the Steinhart. I really like the polished edges of the bezel on the Steinhart. And not forgetting the slimmer lugs. Hate the maxi lugs of the Rolex.
@Rapparini
@Rapparini 4 года назад
Lo Steinhart é un homage al vecchio sub... non al nuovo...
@DJSIC82
@DJSIC82 4 года назад
Thank you!! i am glad i finally found a video with this watch next to the Rolex. They do look very similar in my opinion but that's not a bad thing. I replace the Ceramic bezel on my Steinhart to a aluminum one and the watch Looks hell of a lot better in my opinion it does not look anything like the newer Rolex sub, it looks more like the older vintage ones due to the case not being as wide and i love it!
@jollyrob
@jollyrob 4 года назад
Great review/comparison. I have the 42mm version of the Steinhart which I prefer to the 39 but I think it's good to have the choice. It also has metallic numbering on the bezel like the Rolex. I prefer the Steinhart lugs - the cyclops is adequate but nowhere near as good as the Rolex.
@jamesejudy3
@jamesejudy3 4 года назад
Great comparison. I swear so many people call a Steinhart a "one-to-one copy" of a Rolex sub have never seen the two side by side.
@henriklmao
@henriklmao 3 года назад
Compared the two myself, they do look different. I like a couple things from the rolex more but also a couple things from the steinhart
@martinkosicek1224
@martinkosicek1224 4 года назад
This sub looks shady :)
@jollyrob
@jollyrob 4 года назад
Very easy to say that but can you give a reason why or are you just pretending to know what you're talking about?
@waterhead1029
@waterhead1029 4 года назад
If it's a replica, it's a really good ZZF or a Noob. I can't spot anything, but my only skill in noticing things comes from YT video watch geeks :)
@martinkosicek1224
@martinkosicek1224 4 года назад
Bezel engraving way too dark also sel gap.. just look the bezel number how dark thay are compares to steiny - they should have been platinum
@waterhead1029
@waterhead1029 4 года назад
@@martinkosicek1224 I think I read that to the trained eye, the lack of platinum fill it a tell. For <800 or so USD, you ain't getting platinum.
@garyarnold602
@garyarnold602 4 года назад
Definitely shady...the bezel markers
@Ahcelaht
@Ahcelaht 4 года назад
How is the bezel on that Steinhart? Is it stiff? Does it have a lot of wiggle?
@maxbrenner6426
@maxbrenner6426 4 года назад
No wiggle, but mine is rather stiff... Difficult to rotate, but that's not a problem for me... At least it stays in place that way...
@jollyrob
@jollyrob 4 года назад
The bezel has very little wiggle on my 42mm version.
@ThisIsDavesGarage
@ThisIsDavesGarage 2 года назад
add a drop of boca bearings high speed oil to the side of the case where the bezel gap, it will make it turn like butter...smooth and quieter. Or any synthetic or high quality mineral bearing oil.
@korenglik4634
@korenglik4634 4 года назад
is this rolex a replica?
@SkyNikita322
@SkyNikita322 4 года назад
no, it's a rolex improvement by krauts technikerz
@picassoboy52
@picassoboy52 3 года назад
If it was a replica it would say Rolex, not Steinhart, get it?
@korenglik4634
@korenglik4634 3 года назад
@@picassoboy52 I asked if the Rolex is a replica, get it?
@henriklmao
@henriklmao 3 года назад
@@korenglik4634 looks pretty real, but I cannot confirm a 100%
@Super3xtr4
@Super3xtr4 3 года назад
@@korenglik4634 its a replica 100%, look at the numbers on the bezel, way too dark