Shazam sends me to a rapper that sampled the music, not the actual music? Can someone make a track listing of these tunes? I feel like Steve Roach is in there somewhere?
I created some feedback that looked a lot like the virus like imagery in yellow in the middle of this video (I have hours of it and I still have never seen anything like it. Also not sure how you'd make it in effects programs. It could be done, but it would take forever). You had to rotate the camera to get it moving, which was pretty surreal. it was very weird getting something so organic out of a television and a video camera, it was kind of creepy as if something was attempting to exit the electronics. Ironically, as cameras and televisions both advanced, the feedback changed, but mostly got less interesting, and less stable (meaning the gear was more stable at wiping out abberations). I found some interesting combinations with projectors, but can't really reveal what I was doing but it was nuts. Plus not every camera and every tv worked either. There were specific brands that worked, and as I said, by the mid 90s, the gear changed the look and then stopped generating it overall. However, there is a guy posting on RU-vid who has been using more recent video mixers, and getting some wild results.
Found this via Andrés Gómez’ presentation on the fresh “Symmetry Theory of Valence”, attempting to explain why these patterns feels so good: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tSPZ4xt5f2k.html
nope, it totally is. It shows the underlying nature of reality. Now do DMT so you can throw your emotional brain and sensory perception into this exact same experience and actually live it
Been experimenting with video feedback for a few years now,different cameras different screens. Can tell you there is a deeper "something" going on . Obvious "sacred" symbols will return again and again.. Landscapes and clouds all kinds of recognisable terrain and topologies
This is gold! Thinking about all the Math comments...Math is limited, as it is a human expression. Mathematical solvers, derivatives, etc. can only ever propagate a partial of the full construct.
@@woonyhax5039 I think you underestimate math a little. It doesn't have to follow ordinary "human" rules. You can use any appropriate axioms for a system, and do some very very abstract maths.
vimeo.com/simonezuccarini/upon-repertition-of-thoughts "Whatever the mind can conceive and believe, the mind can achieve" - Napoleon Hill I've been exploring and experimenting this concept and apply it to a world of darkness, lights and projections. Hope you like it
I have the tape! But when I ripped it I got 720p ha. There's a second section on my video here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-erRR3LmKLD0.html - I never knew they were already uploaded!
"Legal Notice" by Robert David Uballe iCopyrighted All Right’s Reserved on Parts or all of whatever’s with or byproducts of Apple Software the origin software and hardware Apple computer company and ibm dell radios television and telegraphs Morse code pony express and trans Union Pacific.
Aside from smooth camera control, distance from the monitor, zoom, and rotation are all important. Ideally, the camera should keep a dead-center aim while being able to rotate vertically 360 degrees. At 180 degrees, every other signal is upside down and its this bouncing back and forth to infinity that generates patterns. Just like you'd draw a star, that angle makes stars. But you get the same sequence of patterns in reverse order in the up-swing from 180-360. If you split the feed into several projectors projecting images close together and film it, the images begin to work as one.
richard burmer - excerpts from "mosaic" eberhard schoener - "bali agung" - Nadi m nature - rio chama* *I can't find anything about this artist or track on the internet. And if you can find it, a similar soundtrack accompanies Fortuna Records/Synopsis Video "Watercolors" (VHS). Another one I can't find on the internet.
Then allow me to save you the trouble of finding that tracklist. (I should have just posted it with that other comment!) ------- Watercolors video track list (1989) steve roach - levels richard burmer - excerpts from Bhakti point steve roach - reflections in suspension richard burmer - winter on the wind mike christopher - fire walker steve roach - snow canon richard burmer - physics richard burmer - 88 steve roach - spheres kevin braheny - lullabys from the hearts of space richard burmer - riverbend richard burmer - Ela-A (theme #2) steve roach - the ritual continues kevin monahan - blue future steve roach - canyon sound
I've been dabbling with this stuff since art school in the 70's and I've found there's a huge difference in the effects that different camera-monitor combinations can create. I was able to get things with VHS and tube monitors that I can't get with the digital equipment now (and vice-versa). Also, if you mount the camera you'll get more-controlled, steady images, but not nearly as creative as hand-held can produce by moving through different parts of the image. But a hand-held feed-back loop is an extremely sensitive thing to maintain and the micro-panning required takes the patience and control of a Zen master.
The secret of maximum chaos is to use a video camera (or analog video processor like Jim Crutchfield does in this video, or I suppose you could use a digital computer if you really wanted to) that inverts the brightness (plus whatever other less dramatic distortions you want to mix in). That way black goes to white and white goes to black, so it never fully washes out to white or fades out to black, and there's always something exciting happening, since the candle can never blow out. I once had an old video camera that actually had a built-in switch that did that, and was perfect for video feedback!
I found that all to be true also - so I made this device to enable fine control over the camera position and rotation (I'm now in the process of adding a second rotating rod that will have a small monitor on it). You can see the device here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wMeV98BHLVE.html
I did amazing feedback in the late 80s early 90s, but you're right, once the tvs and video cameras changed, it pretty much stopped being as interesting as far as the circular aboriginal style that would sit there and crawl like living bacteria. I've actually managed to find the old camera I used, now I just need the right old cathode ray television, though they are disappearing quick, and oddly enough, even ones from the early 2000s won't get the job done. I need a TV from the 80s. Recently, I saw the work of a younger guy using a modern video switcher that is pretty amazing. I took some notes on what he's using. Of course, this is a non-paying hobby, although I plan to use it as one source for layering in a twitch channel. It's kind of amazing that there is probably feedback out there that could've been made with particular equipment and never was and is permanently lost in time. I made several hours on VHS, but it would be cool to go back and do more. I also had some other tricks. There were ways to add more imagery into the feedback loop that it would use to turnover on top of.
Doing this is pretty easy. It's just a feedback loop. I used to do this in 1991 or 1992 with a small handheld camcorcder hooked up to the input on my tv. Started recording it one night, and created some amazing videos(they are around somewhere on an old hi8 videotape). Set them to music, showed some friends in college how to do it and never really thought about it again till tonight.
Did you happen to be in Dallas when you did this? If so, ever show it to 2 long haired headbangers on lsd who somehow found themselves tripping amongst a large group of preppies who were also on lsd in a very nice house somewhere around Deep Ellum?
