Memorization of Quran just means you're a data bank. Doesn't mean your special Allah uses of his servants who he wills , and they will recite the book but it won't pass their throats
Parda In Islam | Reply To Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza | Dr Israr | Mufti Tariq Masood | Firdaus club ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vvE-ldbY9ns.html Chehre ka Parda | Face Veil in islam | Reply to Engineer Muhammad Ali Mirza sahib & Sir Sahil Adeem ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yhM1pz9WgUY.html 🔴LIVE Debate | Topic: Islam Mein Parday Ka Koi Hukam Nahi ru-vid.com3cvgHuNuCK4?feature=share 🔴Live Debate | Islam Mein Parday Ka Koi Hukam Nahi ru-vid.comqKHuZm1dtIQ?feature=share 🔴Live Debate | Islam Main Parday Ka Koi Hukam Nahi | Engineer Muhmmad Ali Mirza | Firdaus Club ru-vid.comG8UZc566GBc?feature=share full play list parda in islam👇 ru-vid.com/group/PLIUD8pjTaQmlVVm_gAqEF04V0buRdXSeG&si=Ik0MMzHs70PI54Ae Surat Bani Isareel Surah: 17 Verse: 36 سورة بنی اسراءیل وَ لَا تَقۡفُ مَا لَیۡسَ لَکَ بِہٖ عِلۡمٌ ؕ اِنَّ السَّمۡعَ وَ الۡبَصَرَ وَ الۡفُؤَادَ کُلُّ اُولٰٓئِکَ کَانَ عَنۡہُ مَسۡئُوۡلًا ﴿۳۶﴾ And do not pursue that of which you have no knowledge. Indeed, the hearing, the sight and the heart - about all those [one] will be questioned. جس بات کی تجھے خبر ہی نہ ہو اس کے پیچھے مت پڑ کیونکہ کان اور آنکھ اور دل ان میں سے ہر ایک سے پوچھ گچھ کی جانے والی ہے ۔ بلا تحقیق فیصلہ نہ کرو یعنی جس بات کا علم نہ ہو اس میں زبان نہ ہلاؤ ۔ بغیر علم کے کسی کی عیب جوئی اور بہتان بازی نہ کرو ۔ جھوٹی شہادتیں نہ دیتے پھرو ۔ بن دیکھے نہ کہہ دیا کرو کہ میں نے دیکھا ، نہ بےسنے سننا بیان کرو ، نہ بےعلمی پر اپنا جاننا بیان کرو ۔ کیونکہ ان تمام باتوں کی جواب دہی اللہ کے ہاں ہو گی ۔ غرض وہم خیال اور گمان کے طور پر کچھ کہنا منع ہو رہا ہے ۔ جیسے فرمان قرآن ہے آیت ( يٰٓاَيُّهَا الَّذِيْنَ اٰمَنُوا اجْتَنِبُوْا كَثِيْرًا مِّنَ الظَّنِّ 12 ) 49- الحجرات:12 ) ، کہ زیادہ گمان سے بچو ، بعض گمان گناہ ہیں ۔ حدیث میں ہے گمان سے بچو ، گمان بدترین جھوٹی بات ہے Surah: 17 Verse: 36
Dear revert brother/sister in Imaan, I am very glad that you have recognised the truth God has revealed in the Quran and couldn't resist Islam. I am your brother all the way from India. I am a revert Muslim too. I hope and pray my advice helps you in your journey. I would like to advise you to take your deen primarily from the Quran and become more Quran-centric in your understanding of Islam. You may turn to Hadith to fulfill the obligations set by Allah such as Salah (Daily prayers), fasting, Hajj, charity, and moral goodness. But not when it tries to push Arabian culture as Islam, created sectarian mindset, and tries to demonise the character of the nobleProphet (Pbuh) or when it clearly contradicts the Quran. For people of sound intellect who like to think deeply, there are many aspects of Hadiths which appear quite spurious and even in direct contradiction with the Quran. You need to be particularly careful when certain stories found in the Hadith collection (compiled more than 200 years after the Prophet), portray the Prophet’s (pbuh) noble character in very poor light. I would advise you to not believe everything blindly because Muslims make you believe in those spurious stories with a lot of zeal, which they have been made to believe through years of institutionalised sectarian indoctrination. I would advise you to exercise caution when exploring the Hadith canon. But the Quran being God’s final revelation is fully protected from human corruption. However, while the other secondary sources of Islamic knowledge may contain some prophetic truth within it, but not believe everything which Muslims have been made to believe through these books is as pure as the Quran. Do bear in mind that Muslims are good people and are very sincere in what they believe about the Hadiths. So it's ok to avoid disagreements when it comes to issues which emerge from certain problematic Hadeeths. Even early Islamic history seems highly distorted due to these man-made ‘holy’ books and this understanding of Islam by new Muslims does create many problems for the Muslim community around the world. I pray Allah always guides you to HIS WAY, and not some sectarian way, made up by people after the Prophet left this world and that Allah keeps you protected from satanic deceptions in matters of faith. Ameen. In my 15 years experience, most Muslims are very Hadith-centric and expect reverts to follow Islam which is predominantly from Hadeeths and not the Quran. Most Muslims are only aware of the beautiful side of hadeeth corpus but are generally kept unaware of the problematic side so if if you blindly follow things which are not from the Quran, you may end up making all kinds of enemies for yourself especially your own family will find you very problematic. But it's not the case when you're more Quran centric in your understanding and practice of Islam. If you would like to have a zoom conversation to discuss these issues, do let me know. I would love to be of some help, purely for the sake of Allah and Allah’s deen.
Wasn’t the Quran transmitted by mouth hundreds of years before being written down? So were the hadith. It would seem from the islamic view, the Quran started from God, but who can say if its oral transmission was precise until it was written down? Whereas the hadith was always authored by man -But in each case chains of narration were relied upon. Effectively the Quran as victim to the same flawed human forces.
He is saying it in the sense that “this age of Muslim rule” became like the gold standard and people don’t realise that this thing “jaziya” existed even before that.
0:40 Yes Mohammed, khimar is not the hijab. the word khimar literally means cover i.e any cover. a blanket can be a khimar, a table cloth to cover the table can be a khimar. Equally, an item of clothing like a dress, blouse, a scarf or any other item or clothing can be called khimar. And to those who refuse, the word intoxicant everywhere and every time in Quran is referred to 'khamr' which has the same root as khimar. Khamr (intoxicants) is given that name since it covers the mind.
Exactly that's why allah purified ahyl bayt and gave an infallible chain in the ahyl bayt. From the prophet Muhammad pbuh to imam ali to imam Hassan and imam hussien to imam zayn abideen to his son imam baqir to his son imam jafar sadiq and because they are infallible this makes it the perfect chain
The Abbas dynasty were sunnis not shia. Actually imam jafar sadiq rejected helping them overthrow the ummayyad dynasty. So has nothing to do with shia because shia dont believe in taking caliphate by force. This is a Sunni concept
The Nouman Ali video is ridiculous. He knows that a command to cover the jaeb with something that is normally used as a head cover cannot logically be interpreted as mandating head covering. And so he attempts these farcical mental gymnastics to claim that the actual state of "head covering" is somehow included into the meaning of khimar - and therefore no specific command to cover the head is needed. Which is absurd, not to mention baseless. Khimar is simply a noun, an item of clothing. Which could, equally legitimately, exist on the head, or tied around the waste, or sitting in a draw somewhere. If it needs to be wrapped around a specific body part, then it needs to be specifically instructed to do so.
The grammatical rules say that "مَا" can be negative with perfect (past) verbs and perfect nouns only. However, to sabotage the statement of the Quran and to bring their falsification in the translation, our scholars take imperative verbs, imperfect verbal nouns or elative nouns such as "أَرْسَلْ" seen in Quranic compound "أَرْسَلْنَا" and "أْنْزِلْ" in "أْنْزِلْنا" as perfect (past) verb which is against and outside the linguistic rules. This is because by taking such imperfect verbal nouns to mean a past or perfect verb they actually want to prove that sending or revealing the messages of God was the practice of the past. However, the Quran has been using these imperfect verbs for a reason which tell us that revelations or God’s message never stops and sending messages and coming revelations is an ongoing process. In fact, "أَرْسَلْ" in the compound of "أَرْسَلْنَا " is not a past or perfect verb, but an imperfect impetrative or command verb in which it is commanded to do the work related to it but when the same imperative or command verb comes with an object pronoun, such as a first person plural objective pronoun"نَا " coming at the end of the compound of "أَرْسَلْنَا ". In such a case, the same verb becomes the infinitive verb, that is, the unlimited verb, in which there is no command to do something, but a cause, a reason or a purpose is emphasized in performing the action of such verbs. In this sense, ""أَرْسَلْنَا actually states that "the reason for our sending" or "the cause of our sending". Hence, the words "وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَا مِن رَّسُولٍ إِلاَّ لِيُطَاعَ" are actually saying, "The only reason of Our sending a message is to obey or comply with". In other words, infinitive command is being given in the compound of "َْأَرْسَلْنَا" that whenever Our message comes, it is obligatory to obey. Imperfect verb does not mean a defective item, but is an Arabic grammatical term used for a verb or a verbal noun the work of which has not yet been completed and which is still going on or will continue. However, those conmen who take "أَرْسَلْ" and "أنزِلْ" as perfect or past verbs have not yet been able to answer my simple question that if the Quranic words "أَرْسَلْ" and "أنزِلْ" are imperfect or past verbs, then what would they call actual past verbs like "رَسَلَ" and "نَزَلَ" and how will they make imperative or command verbs from root words "رسل" and "نزل" in the pattern of other imperative or command verbs such as imperative or command verb "اکتب" is made from its root "کتب" and "اجلس" is made from its root "جلس" and so on??? However, it is a different matter that they have not permanently deleted the imperative or command verbs of root words "رسل" and "نزل" from their dictionaries and other records, and they purposely stopped using them because history testifies that these people used to burn the pages and pages of written memoirs to erase their records and their history so that no one could find any evidence of any of their statements and later they can misrepresent as they wish to manipulate things. For example, manipulating the meaning of the Quran, they claim that their central shrine was built by Prophet Ibrahim and they give its reference from the Quran by destroying the historical evidence of its construction so that people would be forced to automatically admit that if the Quran was saying this, it would be 100% correct. But very few people know the fact that the Quran does not make such a statement in its own words. On the contrary, by putting a bone in the mouth of dogs like Ibn Kathir, all these fictions were deliberately fabricated in the Arabic commentaries of the Quran and the Quran was understood from these fabricated interpretations of Arabic. When the Quran was already existed in their own plain, simple and straightforward Arabic language, several hundred years later, the purpose of translating the Quran into Arabic was to make the Quran the only meaning of what they were giving. Simply because the language is ours, the meaning will also be ours!
I am shocked that how can Nauman ali khan commit such blunder. I thought he’s a genius scholar. But this much basic topic he slips in. Really shocking for me. So sad.
Lol, are you saying that every narrator is a sahaba? He never said Sahaba he was talking about the narrators and there were narrators who actually lied.
ooooh, so this is where sunnis are getting "the same people who preserved the quran" argument lol This is absolutely a false claim. And if he's going to insist on this claim, he needs to submit written documentation from the first generations of muslims for carbon dating.
﴿أَفَلا يَتَدَبَّرونَ القُرآنَ وَلَو كانَ مِن عِندِ غَيرِ اللَّهِ لَوَجَدوا فيهِ اختِلافًا كَثيرًا﴾ [An-Nisā’: 82] (82) Then do they not reflect upon the Qur’ān?[203] If it had been from [any] other than Allāh, they would have found within it much contradiction.
Sunni Tradition wasn't written for a long period of time between Rasool s.a.w and compilation of hadiths. While Quran was compiled while Khulafa of Muslims were alive. Transmission of a book is way more authentic and different than oral Transmission of hadith. There is total oral Transmission and even if we look today, like in Pakistan, we have contradictory opinions about history thats just 10 years old let alone 100 year gap ( between hadith Transmission )
You're right. If Ifsnad entered our spiritual tradition 100 years after the death of the messenger pbuh then that doesn't necessarily mean it was the same way that the Quran was taught. I've encountered this idea of the Quran being transmitted as an oral and practiced tradition before.
Imam Malik lived in Medina and only had 1700 hadiths, but imam Ahmed Hanibal who was born a few decades later suddenly collected 30 000 hadiths. That does not make sense..
What lots of people (even pastors) don't (yet) understand. God created us according to His own image and likeness. Godly. Mankind/the first Adam fell. The image of God in man got lost. That's why there is all this predicament on earth (selfishness, greed, lust, wars, sicknesses, death, etc). We are all born into that mess. For the fall of man a perfect atoning sacrifice had to be made.... that is what God did in Christ. With His own once and for all perefect sacrifice, He paid the debt for the fall of man for us, so we can be indwelled by His Spirit again and finally receive the divine life of the ages back, the first Adam let got of in the fall of man. An amazing act of grace and love by our creator. That is what you see happening in Christ's first disciples. They too healed all and walked in unselfish love. And yes.... that is still avaible today. The holy blood is in place, the Holy Spirit is here to give us understanding, power and transform us back to origin. Not to be debated about, but to be embraced and be-come. So: The Kingdom of God already came. Through Christ, in Spiritform, in those that understand. Hence the divine healing miracles we experience. God manifested in Christ to give us back the divine life mankind lost in the fall of Adam. Christ, the exact image of the invisible God. The image we were created after in Gen 1. The image we lost in the fall of man. The image that can be freely restored by Christ's blood and Holy Spirit working IN us. What a plan. What a solution. What a love. What a God. Jesus is amazing. It is the ultimate conclusion of the word and plan of God. God came full circle. He Himself stooped down from glory to restore us back to original created value: Christlikeness. Walking in divine healing power and unselfish love. Jesus, born of the Spirit of God, filled with the spirit of God. The "Son" of God, the incarnated word, God in the flesh. For three years He healed all, raised the dead, casted out demons, controlled nature, spoke pure divine truth. He said: "Follow Me. If you see Me, you see the Father. The Father and I are one. The glory I have IN My Father, I give to you. It pleases the Father to give you His Kingdom/Holy Spirit/divine nature. I will send Holy Spirit, the same as Me, He will be IN you, guide you into truth and give you explosive power. The same miracles i do, you will do too, because you will understand that the Father is IN Me and I am IN you. Freely I give you My Kingdom/Holy Spirit/divine nature, heal the sick, raise the dead, cast out demons, freely I give, freely share" Etc, etc, etc. I have experienced thousands of beautifull healing miracles through the power of Holy Spirit IN me already. Broken bones, cancers, covid, all kinds of infirmities healed in seconds. Demons manifesting and casted out by a simple "get out, in Jesus name". Jesus. De name above all names. In Him all power and wisdom is sourced and.... He calls us one with Him. God in man and man in God again. C'mon Jesus!! So.... again: God stooped down IN Christ to restore us back to Gen 1:27 were He said: "Let us make man according to our image and likeness and let them have authority.....": walk as Christ. Christ, the exact image of the invisible God. The image we were created after and being restored to by His atoning blood for the fall of man and indwelling Holy Spirit. You are free to receive this original divine life of the ages by Holy Spirit of Christ/God. Ask Him to guide you into truth. Read the Gospel of John and fall in love with your creator. You are not made for the fall of man and its effects, but for the image/glory of God and to walk like Christ. Holy Spirit is the guide and transforming power that will get you there. Amazing grace. A big leap in faith can be made when we start realizing we are already IN Christ, IN the last Adam. Free from the fall! Loved! Growing into awareness of our new (yet old) godly identity. Changing by Holy Spirit. The most fullfilled life ever. Paul healed all on Malta. He understood and wrote: "As in the first Adam ALL died (lost the divine nature), so also ALL were made alive IN Christ to walk in Zoë (= divine life) again". "IN Christ (the last Adam) we are co-cruisified (dead to the fall and its effects), co-raised (justified/made righteousness, holy, blameless, above reproach), co-seated (one with Him)" "The fullness of deity dwells in Christ and YOU HAVE BEEN MADE COMPLETE IN HIM, who is the head of every principality and power". So.... thank you Jesus! Thank you for redeeming me from the fall of man. Thank you for your Holy Spirit that makes this new (yet old) divine life come alive in me. You are amazing! In the shadow of Peter the sick healed... He understood too and wrote: "By Gods power (Holy Spirit) and knowing Christ, we have become partakers of the divine nature and have escaped the fall of man". The divine life of the ages has been returned to us by Jesus once and for all perfect atoning sacrifice for the debt of the fall of man and His indwelling Holy Spirit in us. Jesus/God is amazing!!! Ask Him to give you revelation and change you to the way it was before the fall of man: Christlikeness. He will do so. For it is written: "the Spirit brings forth after His own kind". "I have come to give you Zoë (divine life) in abundance...." So good. Freely given.... because of love
Yes... And the first 2 Caliphs rejected it to usurp authority... The current version of the Quran was later compiled w/out chronology ~17 years after the passing of Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH), in the time of Caliph Usman.
It would seem Nouman himself is quite confused about the subject. "checked the dictionary"..interesting....was the khimar ALREADY being worn or was it ordered by the Qur'an? he knows the answer but seemingly does not know how to apply it..and engages in root fallacy..
@@ahmedmamduh9197 What does that have to do with ISlamic law? And do YOU know the reason why the khimar was worn? It had NOTHING to do with religion....go study anthropology and history. Don't try to impose interpretations on the verses.
@@KhaleelSanDiego I know it had nothing to do with religion but since you're not answering my question let me answer it. The khimar was covering the head and then the back of the body, correct?
@@ahmedmamduh9197 Fair enough. It is just that i work in the field and when it comes to interpreting certain verses, most of my coreligionists do NOT examine the culture before..why were women wearing headcoverings? And completely overlook the several hadith the pointed out Umar NOT allowing slave women to cover their heads. There are several academic research works on the issue....using more than the regular fare of hadith and tafsir (which are almost all circular).
cute noumane so u claime that 1 the people who so called protected the quran protected the ahadith. hmm mou3awiya begs 2 differ. 2 so the prophet who was tasked as messenger didnt wrote it down. even tho writting was manditory given by allah to idriss. ( or do you wanna say oumie means illiterate ) 3 sunna of the prophet ? did he had a own authority to make it up or did he had to follow milaat ibrahim ? 45:9 and many other ayas dont really proof he had that freedom ) 4 allah said he will protect the quran na3am. but who promised you to protect the ahadith ? isnt the best hadith already the quran ? 5 if questioning the hadith means questioning the quran. why do many so called sahih ahadith have missing links in the sinsilaat ? and why had they to get compiled by non arabs like boukhari with atleast a century after the prophet ? 6 wasnt rule nr 1 of accepting a hadith to have a quranic refference. so whats about the sahih ahadith about women being omens of bad luck and urine to just name a couple ?
Absolutely. Allah made no rule against it. The Quran even says that on the day of judgement that only the believers will be allowed to wear gold n silk. So wear what you like and be happy👍
@@naathnaath6377 Read surah Ash-Shu'ara verses 160 - 175. Also, Surah Al-A'raf verses 80 - 84. Please read them fully; I put them like this so you can read the whole story in context, also; it was described in the first quote as transgression, and in the second as immoral, and prophet lot was condemning them, not praising them. So the context and the word choice indicate that it was sinful. So, prophet Lot deemed it sinful; hence it is a sin. This is different than usual, in the sense that Allah is indicating it is a sin through a prophet, and not directly commanding us that it is a sin, like in other sins. My assumption, and I could be very wrong, but I assume that since Allah is indicating it through a prophet and not directly, it could mean that it is a lesser sin than zina (between male and female). Though, I did hear that there were scholars who indicated homosexuality as greater sin than zina (male and female).
@@naathnaath6377 I am not saying I follow the guy, but it is a principle in Islam, that everything is halal, until proven otherwise. I think the exception was meat (on certain occasions).
Silly logic by Menk- so basically he is saying by blowing candles you are carrying out pagan worship? The most important thing is it depends on a persons intentions. If you carry this out based on the pagan worship then I would agree with him but you are simply celebrating a birthday and most people will not have any intention of carrying out some ritual pagan worship so his point doesn’t make sense.
