Tetcon Here you can find textile solutions with your safety and well-being at its core. From evacuation mats to suicide prevention equipment. From funeral equipment to bite-resistant clothing. We've introduced this channel so that you can learn everything about our equipment and so you can use it to minimize training hours.
Evacuation Equipment Can you evacuate safely during emergency situations? Have you thought about the vulnerable? We are specialist in evacuation and mobility equipment and strive to make a difference to ensure that no one is left behind during an emergency evacuation. How we do this? We design, develop and market the S-CAPEPOD evacuation sheet, S-CAPEPLUS evacuation mattress, Bariatric S-CAPEPOD, S-CAPEKIDS evacuation mattress.
I commented here a year a go but upon coming back and reading the uploader's comments I have a different criticism. You say you don't want to put pressure on the person's back as to avoid injuries, but I can't think of any other way to get a resisting adult to lay flat and spread his arms out like that unless he had zero idea of what to do. I will say that this is a creative solution to a borderline unsolvable problem, but I also desperately want to see this pressure tested on an adult, and then for fun, on a grappler with minimal training.
Dear Yotsuba - We can assure you that there's limited to no pressure on the torso of the person lying on the ground. The two ladies are essentially 'locking' the elbows and shoulders without force. They press their backs to one another, so there's no force on the person's back, but it limits the person's ability to move up and down. I have lain down myself and tried to get out, but with this technique, you stop resisting because your motion is limited. I didn't feel any pressure on my back except for my legs, as we've observed that you need to lay down your ankles/knees due to the strength of those. And yes, of course, to get someone on the ground, some force might be needed, but if a person suffers from a severe meltdown, they can be a danger to other staff or patients, and in those cases, only force will allow you to start using this type of transfer. This technique is a last resort, and if that's the case, they try to do it in the least harmful way for the patient. We have tried many techniques, and this is by far the best way to make it as friendly as possible. Hope this explanation is helpful but feel free to give us a call if you like to discuss this in further detail: +31 40 298 99 55. KR, Bob
@@TetconEindhoven My criticism was targeted towards the lack of force. That shoulder lock (similar to a kimura) would be difficult to achieve on a resisting adult who has no pressure on his back. I also acknowledged that, since you don't want to put on any pressure on the torso to prevent injury, a noble goal, this becomes a difficult scenario. Maybe another solution would be to mount the belly down individual on the hips instead of the ribs while the other person controls the legs like in the video. Their arms wouldn't be particularly dangerous in this scenario and they wouldn't be able to buck you off thanks to the rear person's leg control, and despite this level of control their upper body wouldn't be endangered. Additionally, because you would be essentially sitting/ kneeling on the individuals hips and ground while the other person sprawls out on their legs, this hypothetical "technique" would require less fine motor skills and more gross motor skills, as nobody needs to remember any pseudo shoulder submissions in the heat of the moment.
Thanks for sharing Honey - do you have any instructions available how you teach this kind of restraints? We're always curious and eager to learn from others around the world.
Yall really do seem to get a nice laugh out of traumatizing someone and giving them the fear of leaving theyre house. Assholes. Also real good idea restraining someone who wants to kill themselves (makes them want to do it even more) how about just talk to the person instead of treating them like a rabbid animal?
That sucks l. At least for him it does. Or anyone that has to be restrained like that. That's embarrassing, humiliating, mortifying. As far as I'm concerned I think they overdid it. Anyone that has to go through that, that poor person.
I've worked with many very dangerous people in crisis. This is an appalling and very dangerous way of restraining a person in crisis. It comes right out of police and security service manuals. Face down is a complete non starter. People have died. The trainers make this look so easy. It's not, it's dangerous and people get hurt.
The problem with psychiatric facilities is that the aim isn't really to help people. It's rather to take measures against liability suits. Those hospitals all develop their own cultures and never play by the book. In such places it's impossible to create a therapeutic environment. There should be better alternatives than fully restraining patients. The aim actually in such facilities is to show the patients who the boss is and to put them into a certain line rather than helping them or prevent them to hurt themselves or others. Involuntary treatments should be abolished as soon as possible. Such places are the blatant violations of the international conventions which aim to prevent torture and degrading treatments.
You are correct and thanks for sharing your thoughts and concerns. Complete restraints are often out of the question in The Netherlands. This is a technique to simply transfer the patient from point A to point B if they suffer from a severe meltdown and cause a danger to either themselves or to their surroundings. The goal of this type of this restraint is to use as little force as possible, but use the person's body to restrict movements (e.g. lock the elbow instead of the cuffing it). Also, the ladies press their backs against each other and lock the elbows without putting any pressure to the person's torso. These are techniques that are trained to actually improve the well-being of the patients compared to full restraints and using force and pressure which could harm the patients.
@@TetconEindhoven Haha okay, sowas in der Art dacht ich mir schon ✌🏽😄 Ich bin mir zwar nicht sicher ob diese Werbung die richtigen Leute erreicht, aber ich drücke euch trotzdem ganz fest die Daumen! 💪🏽✌🏽😁
Hi Robert - yes that's true. Most hospitals will not use the bed to wheel them out as this could cause big blockades in hallways, not only for rescue services (fire fighters), but also if they need to go a next step in the evacuation process, e.g. staircase evacuation. Using this kind of evacuation tool is a pretty standard procedure for many hospitals and care facilities around the world. Hope this explanation helps ;)
Love to hear more about the practices you have learned. Feel free to send us an email to info(@)tetcon-ge.com. Always great to learn from one and other and improve from other's experiences. Have a wonderful day @mrbritishguyesq2846
I think it's funny how women are always portrayed to be handling these maneuvers. It's like you're a) trying to make it look like men and women are equal in strength (they are not: the median man is stronger than 98% of women on average); b) making marketing for women to feel safe to join your institutions; c) this is some sort of "p---". Make not mistake: in wards where predominantly women work, police is usually called when patients go aggressive. Also, the man could probably release himself from the arm restraints if he tried a little
Never lay on a person's upper body it can cause him to not be able to breathe also don't lay a person face down ,also a person could suufocate also don't lean on a person's neck with your body! You want to restrain a person not suffocate them saftey is number 1
You are 100% correct! The goal of this technique is to ensure there's no pressure on the torso to prevent any fractures. The ladies are putting against each other backs instead of the torso of the patient on the ground. This technique is used to remove the strength of sweeping with arms or legs and reduce movement possibilities while not completely shutting down freedom of movement. Luckily, the facility that is educating their staff on this technique now, there hasn't been any accident and transfers are much smoother now (and less injuries for patients and staff members). If you have any other suggestions, feel free to email us or give us a phone call =) Have an enjoyable day.
Hi @Anonymousgamer-gi7kj - this is to check if the person doesn't have anything in their pockets or socks that could be used as a weapon to harm himself when they are inside the seclusion room. Hope this explains.
@@TetconEindhoven He will use the bed to harm himself. It's no sense seclude a patient limbs free without any sedation. It's fatally dangerous, indeed.
And this is why I urge people to avoid psychiatry like the plague. You get help at your own risk , these people have powers to do awful things to you oncr your in their control . You have been warned.
Also yes :) But most important, is the extremely high tear resistance of the fabric to ensure that it can't be ripped into fabric pieces, because those fabric pieces could cause dangerous situations such as making knots.
Hi there - this blanket is used in seclusion rooms by psychiatric and detention facilities. In Europe, these are considered calm-down zones to ensure patients won't harm themselves when they are in temporary state of shock or have a meltdown. Hope this explains!
It’s based off the idea that suicidal ideation is a very clouded state of judgement that’s a symptom of extreme psychological distress, and that it’s a desire one wouldn’t ever have in a state of contentment and mental clarity. In other words, most health organizations do not believe it’s truly possible to legitimately want to end your life, and such desires are always a symptom of intense yet treatable mental agony. All of this is of course still heavily studied and debated, and critics of suicide prevention do very much exist, and do produce compelling arguments against involuntary psychosocial intervention, which this company seemingly manufactures products for.
society: we have a rapidly growing mental health crisis and increased risk of suicide in our horrible inpatient care centers capitalism: yeah idk about any of that but here's a blanket, hope that helps
Hi Liam - thanks for sharing your thoughts. I'm here to give some extra explanation. This is actually a product which is used by many detention and psychiatric facilities around the world. They place the blankets in seclusion rooms or solitary confiment rooms. In Europe, these are considered calm-down zones to ensure patients won't harm themselves when they are in temporary state of shock or have a meltdown. Hope this explains!
Thanks for sharing your thoughts @Elbritanyico. Yes there are many different scenarios where this technique might not be applicable, however, it is important that staff members are trained for occassions like this. In The Netherlands, they call this training technique 'Safely In Contact'. It is a way to protect the patient, staff members and other patients in the facility, when the patient suffers from a severe meltdown and needs to be transferred to an area to calm down.
I've never been restrained in this manner in a hospital before they always just had four great big assholes slam me to a bed then the strap me to the bed.
The technique used in this video is not humane, we are working towards an court case regarding these issues, we wish you the best and hope that the court case will help in bringing humane treatments to your facility.
