@@lizzieb.4160 apologies this isn’t Joel’s channel, I am just a tour attendee who he gave permission to upload the videos I recorded on my phone. Joel’s channel is called Expedition Bible and is excellent! You can contact him on his website SourceFlix.com! 👍😊❤️
What some fail to realize is how technologically advanced the old world was, many of the things we see today are taken from that time such as tools, boats, weapons, and masonry. The Antediluvian world idea is always swept under the rug because obviously, we live in a world where people remain willfully ignorant and they trust those who tell us what our history is, while also burying ancient sites. If there was a time when sloths were gigantic, insects were gigantic, trees were gigantic, basically everything, wouldn't humans be as well? Or are people still caught up in the lie that we were small and progressively got larger? It's the complete opposite, we are devolving like everything else around us because that's the consequence of sin.
Keep in mind building a boat now is not how boats were built in the past. Chinese and Middle eastern building methods can be examined. A moon pool was in the ark. Dumping waste in the moon pool draws fish to the pool and then you can catch fish to feed the animals on the boat along with the people. This story is more about faith and the story of renewal and promise.
tbh the bible is sometimes not literal on their meanings so sometime when they say they fit all the animal species in there it probably means they put alot of animals or they fitted all the animals on there area not the planet as we think.
It’s wild to think that the High Preist was buried in the same area as the peasant people and don’t forget this is the area where Judas killed himself.
This is the error in David Wood's reasoning - Just because molecules aren't rational doesn't mean that there can't be rational processes involving molecules. The rationality is an emergent process involving the molecules. Molecules don't have a sense of humour but humans, made of molecules, can have one. Molecules aren't wet but water, made of molecules, is wet. It's a fallacy of composition. His whole argument collapses after that.
@@markh1011 it’s Dawkins and Darwin who proclaim that those who believe in naturalism have a lower animal brain and cannot comprehend ideas that include physics!
@@biblicaltours3541 That's not what they are saying at all. In fact Darwin never said anything like that. The point Dawkins is trying to make, and it's valid, is that physics may seem counterintuitive for us because our brains didn't evolve to understand complex physics or the nature of reality. They evolved to survive on the African savannah. Things like atomic theory or quantum theory, or even a spherical earth spinning in space, may not seem intuitively logical to us. Our intuition is good for many things, but understanding the very nature of reality, not necessarily.
@@markh1011your starting point is wrong! Take Sir Isaac Newton, he believed in God so expected that he would find design and order to everything because a mind was behind it and it was designed. The God who claimed to have been the creator in Isaiah asks the reader to come reason with him, this indicates that our mind is fully developed to understand, investigate and reason! Newton wrote commentaries on the Bible and made incredible scientific discoveries because he understood that the creator wanted him to understand. Man loves investigation, enquiry, exploration and invention because our mind is designed to do so by our creator God!
I still think it would be rational to hold naturalism as true even if all the "randomness" of the particles directly determine what a person believes in. I think that even if everything is already determined, that still leaves room for truth to come out of that. Untruthful statements, observations, or beliefs do not typically provide any kind of benefit to us as a society, and thus those ideas and observations are written off as "not true" or maybe "not yet knowable". Thus, those ideas are discarded in place for ideas that more closely align with the truth of reality. Flat Earth is a great example of this. What discarding these untruthful ideas does is create a sort of bell curve, with most people in the middle accepting that the earth is spherical, however there are still those that think the earth is flat. This behavior is predicted by naturalism because we would expect to see people hold "irrational" beliefs even when presented with evidence to the contrary. Now, I will say that on an individual level, yes it becomes extremely difficult to know if what you are believing is true (but then this just turns into the problem of solipsism). But as long as your beliefs aligns with our current observations of the world, then I think that holding naturalism as true can be rational because the naturalist is doing the best they can with the available information. Thoughts?
@@ianmcmullen1979 I lead biblical evidence tours through two of the most important museums in the world, the British Museum and the Natural History Museum in London. You can follow the historical narrative of the Bible from Genesis to Revelation while in a large part using hostile witness accounts on display in the BM. In the NHM Darwin’s theory is destroyed by what the museum itself displays. The three icons of evolution that are used in the museum are easily disproved by the proponents of them, which I show in the museum. Therefore we have one book, the Bible where the supernatural author claims what He did from the very beginning, until now and on into the future, which we can verify! How do you respond? On my playlists you can take the Joel Kramer Israel Bible tour I filmed in 2019 and see the archaeological evidence for yourself! How do you respond? 🤔
@@biblicaltours3541 Isn't Darwin's theory destroyed because Darwin's theory is decades old and much better and detailed explanations of the evolution process that contain SOME of Darwin's idea and refuse others have emerged through our newer understanding of the world and the newer technologies? Evolution stopped being Darwin's own theory decades ago and became much more. And the "which we can verify!" is extremely questionable, I have yet to see any convincing evidence of any supernatural event in the bible being true, but lots of evidence of many of the claims in the bible being false, and no, I do not accept the "for the bible tells me so" argument.
@@biblicaltours3541 given that you believe in pseudoscience, I see no reason to continue the conversation. You didn't even address what I was talking about, because I didn't mention evolution once. "Arguing with an idiot is like playing chess with a pigeon. Never play chess with a pigeon. The pigeon just knocks all the pieces over. Then shits all over the board. Then struts around like it won."
@@ianmcmullen1979 naturalism and evolution are the same thing, sadly according to Darwin and Dawkins the brain of the evolved man cannot comprehend ideas other than the hunter, gatherer! 👍😊
@@biblicaltours3541 You can be a naturalist without thinking that evolution is true. It would just take a separate process for life to propagate like we see. Whether or not you accept evolution is separate from whether or not you accept naturalism. Evolution is a subset of belief/knowledge of naturalism because you need to first assume naturalism before you can even test or hypothesize if evolution is true. Naturalism - "A theory that relates scientific methods to philosophy by affirming that all beings and events in the universe are natural." Evolution - "The process by which populations of living organisms change over time through changes in the genome." So no, they are not the same thing.
If atheism is true then humans have monkey brains, and the thoughts created in our brains are just chemical gaseous explosions - or monkey brain farts as I call them. On what grounds do the atheists trust their monkey brain farts??
_"On what grounds do the atheists trust their monkey brain farts??_ Firstly, they have little choice. You can't connect to someone else's thoughts. But to answer your question, they are mostly trusted because they have been tested probably millions of times since childhood. We test our brains every day. They serve us well. So we _mostly_ trust them.
Carbon-14 dating can be used to determine the age of organic materials up to about 50,000 years old. This is because samples older than that don't have enough carbon-14 to be detected. And this doctor did some Carbon-14 dating on a sample which was supposed to be 120 million years old, and he got the wrong answer. WOW. Who gave this individual a doctor title?
@@biblicaltours3541 If you do C-14 dating on dinosaur bones, you only get erroneous answers. It does not work. Similarly, measuring the humidity in the air with a thermometer does not work. If you want to conclude anything from the fact that something is not working, be my guest.
Dawkins used the word "intuition," which would be the thoughts that automatically come to you. Intuition alone isn't going to figure out how reality works. You need more than that, you need a methodology like science.
Apparently you require intuition to even comprehend the methodology of science Rationality comes first before intuition, you need to be able to reason so that you can apply your intuition and then test whether or not your intuition is true an example of that is hypothesis and theories both require intuition, the capability of being able to reason helps a person to establish his/her intuition with the use of rationality aka trying to reason out why his/her intuition is true and that's what we call science cause methodology aka process aka science alone is already established but the only thing left is that you need a person to be able to think intuitively so that the person may lay out the foundations based on his/her own understanding what his/her has found out about nature
Apologies this isn’t Joel’s channel, I was just a tour attendee and I filmed using my iPhone. Joel gave me permission to upload the videos and my channel isn’t monetised. I just want everyone to have an opportunity to see the tour with Joel! Yes he is an excellent guide and I am very pleased that you have commented! Who knows when Joel will be able to tour these sites again? 🤔👍😊❤️
They all fit on a picnic table and are mostly teeth! There is only one hipbone which has been altered. Donald Johanson doesn’t let anyone examine Lucy’s fossils, why is that? Hiding fossils from scrutiny of others means that they are not falsifiable and therefore should be removed from museums and books until they meet the scientific method standards!
It's to the ends of the oikoumene, which was the entire Roman world (even the new Legacy Standard Bible translates it correctly), not the ends of the entire planet. Time indicators and audience relevance, people. Matt 24 was fulfilled in the 1st century.
@biblicaltours3541 yes, but not before having been a dispensationalist and then a postmillennialist. I must say that I love and enjoy your videos on this and your other channel. They bring so much of the biblical record to life. They have strengthened my faith. Thank you for what you're doing.
Annas was a farce of a high priest. He was appointed by the Romans, then removed by them. His son-in-law was also appointed by the Romans. It is just that Annas' grave is so desecrated.
Thanks for the informative video. However, it doesnt' actually say what the Sign of Jonah is. Whatever the Sign of Jonah is, it needs to conform to these facts: 1. In Mark 8 Jesus forcefully prohibited any sign from heaven for first century Israel. The phrase, "In truth I tell you. .." is part of an Hebraic oath formula, much like the English, "Never in a million years," or "It will be a cold day in hell when that happens." Therefore, the Sign of Jonah for first century Israel cannot be a miraculous sign such as Jesus' resurrection. (Jesus' resurrection certainly did take place, but it was witnessed by less than 1000 brothers, and not by all of Israel. Jesus did not parade throughout Israel displaying his fatal wounds for all to see.) 2. In Luke 11 Jesus noticed that the crowds wanted a sign from heaven to confirm his authority, and he rebuked them. In Luke 11 Jesus said that the only sign that first century Israel would receive was the sign of his ministry, and he compared his ministry to that of the prophet Jonah's in Nineveh. Jesus' definition of the Sign of Jonah in Luke 11 fits in nicely with his prohibition of any sign from heaven for Israel in Mark 8. 3. In Matthew 12 Jesus is asked for a "sign from you," and he replies by predicting that his burial will be for more than 24 but less than 72 hours. Jesus compares this limited time of burial to Jonah's burial in the great fish. This prediction about burial duration has been misunderstood as meaning resurrection. But Jesus predicted his resurrection many times, and in none of those instances did he include the words, "The Sign of Jonah." The key to understanding the Sign of Jonah in Matthew 12 is to notice that Jesus did not designate it to "this generation," as he did in Luke 11. Instead Jesus used the words, "An evil and unfaithful generation," and that phrase is not era specific. It could be understood as meaning any future generation, including our own. See: "The Image on the Turin Is 'The Sign of Jonah" For Our Generation!" by Rev. Larry Stalley, 2020. And: "The Enigma of the Sign of Jonah," BSTS Shroud Newsletter, Summer 2023.
👍Thanks. Btw, your tour group on this set of uploads -- the one with Michelle -- always seems much happier, integrated and relaxed than the tour groups on other Holy Land tours on RU-vid👍
Michel is the Israeli guide that accompanied Joel Kramer on our tour. Yes, our tour group was very friendly as Joel and his wife Cathy are excellent guides! Thank you for commenting! 👍😊❤️
You guys have been and always will be heavily debunked by actual non biased science. When you begin with your religion as the foundation, you’ll always fail.
so you believe that even when the scientists admit on film that they haven’t found the intermediate fossils required for a fully terrestrial mammal turning into a fully aquatic mammal you will still believe, that’s faith! Only 9 million years is given for whale evolution process, you have to change everything about the dog, including how it sleeps!! All by random, unguided chance mutations. How long does it take to get two random mutations to actually work together and be fixed, over 100 million years! As Christians we have biblical archaeological evidence proving Genesis to Revelation and Creation evidence in abundance. Charles Darwin and Charles Lyell wanted to remove Moses from science as a stated aim, could that show a bias and the exclusion of evidence that would destroy their theory??
Except the sign of Jonah!!! We have plenty of evidence from Mosel/Nineveh that Jonah existed, the British Museum references his tomb location with a photograph!
@@biblicaltours3541 In Luke 11 Jesus stated that the ONLY sign that would be given to Israel is the sign of his ministry which he compared to Jonah's ministry. So, the empty tomb cannot be the Sign of Jonah for ancient Israel. See: "The Image on the Turin Shroud Is 'The Sign of Jonah' For our Generation!" by Rev. Larry Stalley, 2020. And: "The Enigma of the Sign of Jonah," BSTS Shroud Newsletter, Summer 2023. It is too bad that the authors of this video refuse to engage in a dialogue.
@@jeffreyerwin3665 How do you know he's referencing Mark 8 instead of Matt 12 in response? I think you're know they're 2 different requests at 2 different times. The sign of Jonah was given to that wicked and perverse generation. Best not to start little quibbles about things.
Hi this isn’t Joel’s channel, I am a tour attendee that he gave permission to upload the videos I filmed using my iPhone. Hence the low quality sound and filming! I just wanted as many people to see Joel’s teaching as possible, my channel isn’t monetised! Thank you for commenting! 👍😊❤️
I'm 13 and I already know enough about this stuff to find the faults in how monotheists attempt to discredit evolution. The evidence is there. Try looking at alternative viewpoints, as I did, and not just try to justify your preexisting, brainwashed, learned beliefs.
I am a creation evidence tour guide in the Natural History Museum London. Please look up their site map and see if you can find the galleries filled with intermediate fossils Darwin said must be found for his theory to be true? Christians have the archaeological evidence of the historical narrative of the Bible in the British Museum where I lead tours and abundant creation evidence in both museums! You are not evolved from an ape but created in the image of God because He loves you! 👍😊❤️
