I have a question to anyone that can answer it---I have a fraudclosure filed against my property---I say fraudclosure, because the MORTGAGE they are trying to enforce is NOT signed by the true title holders of the property...the property is actually a joint owned property requiring the signatures of all the owners, the "mortgagor" that signed, was holding under a bad or "interloping" deed. Without getting into the details of the MASSIVE collusion involved, I want to be able to make the proper objection to keep the mortgage out of evidence, as it is invalid....I have raised the issue with specificity that the "mortgagor did not own the property" in the answer to their complaint--How would I prevent this invalid mortgage from being entered? --foundation? They cannot produce a chain of title to said mortgagor because he was defrauded, ---the seller did not have title...should they not have to prove title in the mortgagor before the "mortgage" can be entered into evidence?
Thank you! This is the best video regarding this topic, on laying the foudation for evidence. It's super CLEAR explanation, great examples, and super practical. Thank you again!!!!
Thanks! Very helpful. Two questions. (1) How would I get a copy of a paystub into evidence if my sponsoring witness is the employee and obtained it by printing it out from a database she has access to after inputting her credentials. (2) I hear a lot about using your exhibits when put into evidence. Say you simply got them in but didn't use them. How would the court say in a bench trial use that evidence if at all?
@@winbyworking Scheduled for "Trial Readiness Conference". Not clear if that is that same thing as "trial call date" thus triggering applicable deadlines. Also, where local department rules require motions in limine at the TRC, can I present written ones without prior serving of opponent?
A search warrant must be signed by a judge and not the police. I suspect the reason for the defense’s motions is motivated in part by the desire to avoid dealing with illegality of the warrant. SRY
Thank you for this video. The prosecution filed a motion of limine of 14 different contexts. Like supressing dash cam and body cam footage of police illegal entry my home. The search warrant was signed by an officer and was for a strangers cell phones. The police illegally touching my breast. Damaging my property and breaking a fuel line into my home leaking 100s of gallons of fuel after they told me and my mother in law they were going to kill and why. The prosecution is trying to supress any witness speaking about the search warrant and the footages. There is so many it is hard to exlain on a comment. I now understand what they are really used for. Thanks again
So sorry that you had to experience such traumatic violations of your own person as well as your constitutional rights. I hope you get justice and complete healing. 🙏 😇
I believe that facts and law really don't matter in trial. What does matter is the story. A story trumps facts and law every time. I'll tell you why I feel this way. The decision making process that everyone goes through, whether they know it or not, is based upon the person's principles and values. They make a decision, and THEN they go looking for facts and law to support that decision.
