Many years ago I was a friend of Brian and Anne Higgins , Dame Rosalyn's brother- and sister-in-law. I met Terence a few times but I never met Rosalyn.

Reading

Ma boi Findlay what a ledge

This is a very slippery slope. It might seem like a helpful idea. But as in calfornia we see that idea has become and has been perverted by the state government and it ia the medical community fault.

Exodus 21,22 the ten comnandments

That's because parliament is bound to the UK not England. Example the king is the monarch of the UK legal capacity. He's the King of England as a Man

Any suggestions for reforming the Judiciary in the UK?

Who's here in 2024 👀

Can I remix and publish it as a RU-vid short? I'm inspired by the talk. Or perhaps you could help promote these great thoughts somehow?

Congratulations!🎉🎉

And a glittering legal career ends in a squalid pact with the Post Office...

👏🏻👏🏻

Parliament is Sovereign over government, thats it. They are Supreme makers of legislation that must compliment our individual personal rights and constitutional restraints. Parliamentary sovereignty does not stand up to scrutiny or logic. it's a joke, a cruel one at that. This was sorted out in 1688/9, and there were no Devine Rights of Kings handed to anyone. Common Law is the Law of the Land, not statute.

Watching this 7years later .

Deep and insightful!

Thank you! & Finally! Help us leave the dark period behind.

The trolley problem was never intended to have a clear-cut solution. Who'd want to be a judge!

If you want to apply for a Judicial Review and the time limit is 3 months how did those women bring one against the Met years after the events in Metropolis v dsd & nbv

Part four This makes the legal structure more apt in regards to the one of a legal person. There is a very unassuming example, although considering it's ancient possible record such attribute as one being a unassuming example should put consideration at minimum as to what is presented in regards to teaching and consequential learning. The example is the literal physical proof of possibly the first proper firms and similar groups to that of corporations of today. The unassuming part regards to the fact of the example having been taken as anything other than that. The example is a pottery utensil, the example is a water vessel type of pottery utensil, the example is known as the dypilon inscription, on such a pottery utensil, the example is simultaneously one of the oldest greek alphabet inscriptions found. The inscription is one of the most amazing inscriptions to have ever been found, simply because of its implied ingenuity. This inscription is one of the earliest examples to have been found indicating the level of language structure in existence as of much further then than thought. The inscription is a product inscription in regards to place of origin, regarding transport, market, and life span within a market, or an establishment selling it as a market point, guarantee, a constant guarantee, for a, any and all possible combinations of clients to assess themselves physically, meaning it is not a seal, sign, or mark which can be falsified, manipulated and copied, it is pure and simple a most high degree and level of logic. Such intricate and complex language use in regards to possible structures and systems enabling such structures, is not made as a happening for possibly give or take two and half thousand years, and as of the present standing, is as wobbly as it can possibly wobble. I know this without having studied any of this, because I speak, write, think, sing, shout hallucinate and dream in the Albanian language, form before birth. In doing so I understand a word such as (kadal) in northern dialect and (ngadal) in middle and southern dialec. It's first standing structure means slow, then slowly. If and when doubled, meaning repeated two times, means fairly or very slowly, then it changes as a direct sudden stop, back to it as one word to a necessary stop. Simultaneously the word means, is out, as an answer to a question, with the is part refering to a human being most of the instances. If and when separated in to two words, (ka) means there is, in regards to a tangible physical anything, as in (have), or which direction of orientation, whereas (dal) remains out. In regards to modern greek, the word as one, means lizard, separated in two mean ,the, and a very common highly spirited usage similar and spaning all the way to English in the form of (dale, or dale dale) refering to a open plain, field, middle, circle, and movement in its regards etc etc A legal structure will present it's applicable natural laws simply by and off existence, including a, any and all possible combinations of limited liabilities. A legal person can do so also, but only through the direct or indirect usage of a, any and all possible combinations of physical natural structures, meaning in most cases legal or most definitely scientific. This makes one highly manipulative even if and when well established within existence, and the other hardly manipulative even if and when desired or attempted to do so. The mistake is this....! If and when determined, attempting or seriously trying to help anyone or anything which is firmly visible within a inescapable present, while such if and when remains hidden even in the form of the concept, meaning for all means and purposes, to anyone or anything which is firmly visible within a inescapable present, that if and when might and empirically is either the past or worst the future... Then such hidden if and when help becomes a serious hindrance, in fact it manipulates and within worst cases destroys the very present by changing the past or worst the future in all what it regards to anyone or anything which is firmly visible within a inescapable present. It only works and consequently is used to literally hide the help and the helped simultaneously as a corresponding accordance. One way enables impartiality at its highest degree and level, the other makes impartially impossible simply based on the reaction to the very present, unchanged, changed or manipulative. One way requires always a concept and only a concept to begin with, the other way requires always a structure, only a physical real structure to begin with. One start is real, the other is abstract. Anyone or anything as a physical structure under such influence is hunting, being hunted, aware of being hunted, unaware of hunting, hypnotized or completely ignorant to any off, meaning dazed, numb or under a, any and all possible combinations of influences. Anyone or anything as a concept under such influence, is beyond the defenition such as (something else) in regards to many many layers deep as a point of physical origins contact excluding possible concepts, simple because in being a concept it is always being as such by and off a, any and all possible combinations of physical structures to begin with. Meaning all and much more happens before even a concept off, can come to mind as a possible thought. This has only but a always conclusive meaning in regards to the highest possible logical degree and level of ascending and descending order pattern. One which conclusively states, any form or possible presentation of such a combinations of structures hiding, well hiding a, any and all possible combinations of principles supposedly uncorrelated and completely detached from the very structures used, are not help. In fact upon any level of manifestation, the corresponding explanation already put forward as a possible understanding should be adopted as quickly as possible. It is not help simply because it jeopardises the very present of someone or anything firmly visible within it through manipulating past and future, making such someone or something face danger in regards to a present which was already not a danger in regards to its past and future to begin with, with the caveat of claiming any (a must survival) of anyone or anything which is firmly visible within a present, one which is turned to danger from safe, as help, upon that anyone or anything being on safe ground again. I believe it to be a most valid conscious understanding showing in full as a tangible physical structure although it cannot be seen within it's entirety, making it a physical concept simultaneously, that a legal structure is more likely than not, a much more practical wording structure than a legal person, in regards and concerning existence, be it direct physical or physical abstract, abstract physical.... There is an infinity within the present to have and achieve a, any and all possible combinations of advantages, because the present is where all is, everything, even concepts, even the past and future are in the present, if not each does not exist. (The scary optimistic standing is this. The structure enabling life will not be taken as a constant given, while the structure going against life was taken long long long ago without even being given, let alone existing as a constant, making it optimistic for life and scary simultaneously.) © Emir Doçaj March 15 2024

Part three All this of which I have given an explanation is easier said than done, fortunately the easier said part, together with than easier done part, already exist as part of private records and public records, off and by some of the most influential and powerful countries including companies. This means it should be these very important structures as a consequence of being already within possession of the corresponding data, the know how, experience and the resources which can and should take such a metamorphosis, not transformation or drastic change, but a logical metamorphosis, beneficial to the structure undergoing it, and the structure it operates within, hopefully leading to a better functioning reality and as consequence outcome of reality in regards to both types of structures within a all encompassing larger democracy structure. The word structure instead of the word person has this advantage, and this advantage is closely with and within reality of being, this fact makes the word be a concept and a physically tangible thing simultaneously without any serious contradictions or paradoxes. A large enough structure one which is simultaneously complex and intricate can only be taken as a whole reality through the means of a concept, simply because it is hard to access it as a whole tangible thing. A city is such a structure, a country is such a structure, a continent, an Ocean, or a planet, even a whole specific biological system is such a structure, this follows that a company is and can be considered a structure, a legal structure which upon legal requirements of contact a, any and all possible combinations of it's equally physical legal sub structures can be accessed and much easier definable in a, any and all possible combinations of regards. More importantly all of its structure as substructures can and should easily be of a physical in nature, even if and when involving the fastest possible digital energy interchange or information transaction, including it's quantum computing abilities, algorithms, neural networks, or the supposed learning abilities. In being the word is a concept and a structure simultaneously without any serious contradictions or paradoxes, it gives an enormous advantage in granting access to the correct legal now how, and restricting access to the incorrect legal now how, maintaining a strong functioning state and a market freedom advantage. This nonetheless already exists and arguably effectively or ineffectively, although it does not exist under the team structure and concept, it exists only under the individual concept simply because what the wording and the legal defenition off and by (person) allows. Making independent shielding or correct control highly manipulative and a resourceful waste. It means a, any and all possible combinations of players can only function at their benefit or referied individually, making laws, rules and regulations take a lot of unnecessary strain, which makes such functions brake or become irrelevant. Through the legal structure representation a simultaneous shielded market freedom operating, and a equally simultaneous refering can be achieved, similar to having a pitch where different games and teams made of different players are active and inactive simultaneously and according to the pitch level and game level, yet in all being real, and reality, a highly general all the way to a very specific physical structure, a legal structure, applies in regards to shielding and control. This would enable to keep the pitch always active, a, any and all possible combinations of the games being played uniterrpted, a, any and all possible combinations of players unaffected in regards to being active or not, and the refering uniterrpted simultaneously, simply because a structure is real even if and when only conceived as such by being extremely big through it's very real defenition in the form of a concept, such a planet earth. I believe it to be important and it might be useful to consider it important because it bypasses a very unnecessary confusion, a confusion which arises form stating a, any and all possible combinations of something's as a concept only, meaning the implications of a, any and all possible combinations of something's, are considered as a given, so complex and intricate, even if and when not enormous in physical size in order to be observed as such in their totality (earth for example) giving it a supposed right to be considered only as a concept in order to establish it as being within existence. Such a method is very useful to think about the universe, God, the spirit, ultimate consciousness, the after life, imaginary if and buts etc etc.. But if and when considering tangible physical existence, a concept has to take a structure, not given one, but take that which is naturally it's logical structure, not even its hypothetical, probabilistic, or predictable structure, be such a hypothetical, probabilistic, or predictable a very logical one. A state, a country, a city, all the way to a human being has such structure present and constant no matter how it is understood or started as being, if the present is forced to argue it's existence against none presence it's already at a loss, it means the none presence can and will always dictate the correspondence in a, any and all possible combinations off and by regards. © Emir Doçaj March 15 / 2024

Part two In my opinion this is as particularly as it can be, but in order to get into more particulars and specifics, one of the most fundamental rights in regards to groups or individuals if and when gathering, and such a gathering is lawfully recognised as prosecutable or protection through the concept of legal person and not a concept structure such as legal structure, regards to the right of asset locking. Such a right is extremely important, yet under the legal person concept this right is literally taken away upon a giving, simply based on the fact of a, any and all possible combinations of assets locked in being higher or lesser in value of importance, making such a gathering dependant on a, any and all possible combinations of higher asset locking, one which might even give the right and while supposedly being completely detached from the gathering, can literally devalue or evalue the very asset locking which supposedly gives the independence to a, any and all possible combinations of people as single or groups. This means that grain which through natural law, even if and when humanly made, can or is turned into nothing, while (and this is important) still existing in a, any and all possible combinations of it's natural form. Making a lot, and this means a lot of companies dependent not only in their existing assets but in a none existing concept which establishes the value of such assets bypassing complete the natural law, thus physical structures. The value a, any and all possible combinations of assets wether locked or not can increase and decrease in many possible combinations of existing natural law ways which is exactly what a, any and all possible combinations of markets use in order to operate, making grain none existing in terms of value although existing in a physical structure, and it is precisely that which points to the importance of a concept structure such as a legal structure. If and when a structure has a use, such use is legal in nature, and by being so it has its value protected. This is all possible (taking the example of grain) when there are eight billion people on earth, and a considerable number, are highly discriminated by and off any possible value of grain, be it high or low, yet the value off and by humanitarian or social help in such numbers regard, rarely decaluates, in fact goes the opposite off. This has no other choice but to force any groups represented as legal person to result to other means and consequently structures in order to protect the very foundation of their functioning, the ability to lock assets in a group in order to make use of a, any and all possible combinations of advantages that brings. This can and does often turn natural existence value as physical structure into an abstract one, one which is highly manipulative if and when existing only as such, without a firm standing in a legal structure. Once the first right is taken, being the one where assets are locked in, while supported only by and off a concept which always remains as such, meaning having no tangible natural in standing lawful structure, the other very important right which is equally foundational to the natural existence of a group or individuals ability to gather themselves as desired or wished while also being in complete none opposing existence to natural law even if and when such is humanly made, makes it possible to move it only downhill from there. This right is known as limited liability, and through such a process this right turns from a right which it is, into a perk which it is not. Simply because the law itself, be such in regards to a very complex democracy or none existing democracy, a, any and all possible combinations of law statues and systems are within itself a limited liability. Manifested as fines, minimum and maximum sentences, different types of life sentences instead of a death sentence, due process, hearings, judgment, appeal, health and safety, civil, and on and on and on which in principle makes the law a right and not a perk, whereas limited liability in regards to legal person as a concept, makes it a perk in regards to what, how, when and whom the assets are locked in. Taking a road as an example, a, any and all possible combinations of laws in it's regards are naturally deducted by and off the existence of it as a structure, despite the thought which points law having being invented, as a consequence the road itself produces a, any and all possible combinations of limited liabilities in its regards as being and usage which is a benefit or disadvantage if and when taken or not taken into account. The protection of the road as a legal structure despite its possible usage, is asset shielding a right under a, any and all possible combinations of law structures as a right and not a perk, which is what should have been applied to art long before it's current application especially if and when a civilisation. One concept and simultaneously a most tangible physical structure, off and by more or less an exact if not very similar chemical form, is what has put under serious stress what I am attempting to highlight. The concept is none other than energy and the chemical form is none other than fossilized carbon, known as fossil fuels. Considering the planet has been within above billions count in regards to human beings for a little while by now, and human beings are a physically biological structure, which not just consumes energy through physically transforming applicable resources to it's biological structure, but uses that very transformation method in the most ingenious ways possible to achieve, enable and produce, a, any and all possible combinations of such applicable resources, which enables it's biological structure to abundantly and safely consume that which is applicable to it's structure. Then a natural value no matter the system of governance in regards to such a concept and physical structure in a chemical form is a given as a natural law. This means that it is extremely logical in existence, yet it's illogicalities are often wrongly or rightly pointed as present, so much so that extreme and often in complete opposite to any possible system available, measures to protect or jeopardize its natural value let alone a, any and all possible combinations of market value, is undertaken, always through very physical structures, up to the absurdity of making away with as a resource. Which means a biological structure into billions measure, needing energy consumption as a must by and off natural default, logically argues to make away with the energy much needed as a must, simply because it regards it as a concept which has physical manifestations, and not a physical structure which is physically tangible in a, any and all possible combinations of chemical forms. I am making use of this example in order to highlight another one which has supposedly suddenly sprung up, but the suddenly part is only a sequential consequence of many previous examples. The example I want to highlight is known as digital technology. As a consequence of a concept used in order to represent reality, while simultaneously no attempt or desire is there to fix such a concept to the physical structure of reality, the logical pattern which states, (a very specific and precise form of energy which makes use of a, any and all possible combinations of other energies in order to be as such, and by being as such, a, any and all possible combinations of other energies can and are utilized by and off people throughout the planet is not totally and entirely a tangible physical structure within physical existence) is initiated, developed, maintained, and enacted as logical. This makes such logic highly manipulative, other than that and including many of its illogical forms, such logic makes all, (and the all part is important) of science, not physical, not real, none existing unless only as a concept with no physical tangible abode and that is highly manipulative, historical proven. As with the first example of energy in the form of fossil fuels but more in regards to energy in the digital form, both have proven and continue to remain elusive and highly manipulative as a consequence of each default understanding and usage of existence. Especially now in the present in regards to the digital form, an increasing complexity level of confusion is and has been initiated, developed, maintained and enacted, making a, any and all possible combinations of more likely than not already in existence correct applicable laws highly, with worryingly often extremely difficult to do. I am not stating in any way possible that applying a, any and all possible combinations of laws to concepts cannot be achieved, as in doing so reality is denied as a happening. I am stating on the other hand, one only has to slightly or drastically change a logically acceptable structure which a concept having a law applied to relies upon, and simultaneously the law applying to such a concept is bypassed at a profitable margin level, often getting sniffed at as happening and becoming a persistent bypass, triggering a law review or market constriction even regulation, ending often as a higher damage to a, any and all possible combinations of markets if and when combined periodically, constant in occurrence and as a much larger market combinatory global system, than the actual bypass itself. © Emir Doçaj March 8 2024

Part one Considering everythings and everyone's involvement, which includes enormous amounts of resources and people, it might be helpful to use as a, any and all possible combinations of practical defentions, something which is not a concept only, and no matter how it might be treated does remain as such, but instead make use of something which is extremely practical, and although it in itself is a magnificent concept, simultaneously is something, meaning a literal measurable and often easily definable thing, especially if and when considering all the scientific advancements achieved so far in all fields. The changing according to all practical processes of the term (legal person/entity) to (legal structure) instead. It might or might not seem obvious, yet in taking the words (legal structure) one is making use of a concept and a concept, which are equally definable if and when required by most systems. There is a literal legal structure, there is physical structures, there is biological structures, there is chemical structures, there is financial structures, there is educational structures, and one including each having sub structures themselves, using the term (legal structure) instead of the (legal person/entity), might help enormously in regards to treaties, international law and rights, market's, oversight, banking, development, investment etc etc. Most importantly it might help in establishing the right regulations in regards to new business types entering a, any and all possible combinations of markets through innovation, especially if and when considering all the digital and all up and coming A.I (structures), without forgetting the ever elusive new, newer and newest financial existing and up and coming structures, which keep the market together with a, any and all possible combinations of governments, lagging always behind. In fact it can be argued that profits and necessary investments are lost as a result, meaning the system and a, any and all possible combinations of people making and using such structures are at a loss. It will shed light on concepts such as GDP, inflation and deflation, increase stability and not stifle innovation or capital freedom. It could help the principal of having a lesser unwanted governmental oversight and very practical ways to address social concerns, without needing in most cases a complete or even a partial system overturn, in fact the data to achieve it is already in existence as of minimum fifteen hundred years and continuing. The word structure instead of a person in regards to legality is important, simply based on natural existence, hence natural law. It might be useful to distinguish the intentional or unintentional confusion in regards to what is represented as a, any and all possible combinations of understandings regarding natural law and positivism concepts. In order to give a usable example, the physical structure of stairs or ascending and descending steps is to be used. Upon conception, initiation, development, maintaining, and enactment there is hardly any practical physical ways to side step a, any and all possible combinations of stairs or ascending and descending steps, especially if and when within it as a structure or even faced in order to undertake. The literal physical structure is so logical within existence, making it hardly thought as a incorrect structure until. Until faced by and off someone anyone which is physically impeaded to use or worst undertaking if and when able to use. In being that such cases are often rare in numbers and thus observation, the illogical part of, remains elusive, physically and literally hidden, until. Until a larger and larger group of people gather as a continuous standing existence, making as a consequence the formation of very large towns and cities, reaching often into double digit millions in count. At such point the illogical part of one of the most logical physical structures such as stairs and ascending and descending steps, still remains elusive, physically and literally hidden, causing as a consequence a huge problem in regards to social, resources and law applicability meaning humanly normal existence as behaviour, until. Until a, any and all possible combinations of people as a direct or indirect connection, contact or knowledge off, come up with a much more practical way of mobility especially in regards to anyone who is physically impeaded as a standing natural way of their existence to make use of anything resembling as stairs or ascending and descending steps, without a considerable assistance as a most necessary physical in nature. At such a point the illogicality of one of the most logical physical structures such as stairs or ascending and descending steps becomes so obvious that it literally requires a physical intervention which was never even considered before, especially if and when people are required to physically assist not only the person but also their mobility means in order to make use of a, any and all possible combinations of stairs or ascending and descending steps, simply based on the numbers a, any and all possible combinations of large areas of population often reaching into double digit millions in number. This is all possible to achieve, simply by pointing to the physical existence of stairs or any ascending and descending steps, while leaving out completely a, any and all possible combinations of concepts in each regards. Making a, any and all possible combinations of answers manifest with considerable ease. The intentional or unintentional confusion between natural law and positivism is shown be it a physical structure such as stairs or ascending and descending steps. The very structure itself once faced with is and becomes the law, one which is hardly possible to side step, making it a natural law, even if and when humanly made, the attachment of a, any and all possible combinations of morals in regards to it's application or existence as physical structure, has no other choice but to apply positive affirmation in regards to it's cause and effect action, making it positivism. This means natural law means, it, physical existence must be obeyed simply based on it as existing, whereas positivism means, it, must be giving as reason, to be used. A, any and all possible combinations of legal persons require a constant reason one which is often as a must in order to apply a standing law, derived from and by a, any and all possible combinations of existing tangibly measurable physical structures, making it, not just simply always only a concept, but highly manipulative as a concept. It might be useful to consider this, not because of a, any and all possible combinations of needs to be against companies or capitalism, in fact is totally the opposite, it might be useful in order to protect capital and a, any and all possible combinations of companies. Simply based on natural law, one which makes evident the importance of a single person to gather themselves, as desired or wished in complete none opposing existence to natural existence even if and when such is humanly made, making evident the importance of group's gathering themselves as desired or wished while also being in complete none opposing existence to natural law even if and when such is humanly made. It is important because such evidently obviousitie could be considered the core foundation of what is aimed, known or unknown as democracy. Such foundation is manifested once a specific act in regards to democracy is initiated, developed, maintained and enacted. Such an act is known as casting a vote, such an act can only be achieved if and when person's or groups of persons are able to gather themselves as desired or wished while being in complete none opposing existence to natural law even if and when such is humanly made. Although often wrongly thought, people always cast a vote in regards to structures, highly represented as physical in nature, there is hardly any case where people cast a vote in regards to a concept which always remains as such, such as heaven for example. Simply because that vote means nothing, whereas one based on the existence, idea or worryingly often understanding of a, any and all possible combinations of structures, that has a very physical meaning, one noticed as soon as one wakes up or goes to sleep. © Emir Doçaj 8 March /2024

Second part In order to see to what I am aiming to refer and describe with words, it's plausible span in a possible measured time, one can use information that of which is known in regards to Egypt's dynasties. Taking such a record of history, then a application in regards to language one can apply to it. In doing so, one will soon clearly see a very early period where language is a written in stone, stone tablets quite often, a method which was adopted by Mesopotamia, Rome and Greece later. After that, not long, a period where language is a written in papyrus appears simultaneously with the one in stone, and a conflict is there to deliberate. After that a introduction through conflict arrives from the opposite side of the Mediterranean, introducing a new addition, where language is a written in parchment, simultaneously with the one in stone and papyrus, and a conflict is there to deliberate again. After that the same introduction where language is a written in parchment which first appears from the opposite of the Mediterranean, is reintroduced from the side of Egypt, through a conflict, and a conflict is there also to deliberate, all the way to actual paper and the digital present. Throughout all of the example given, including all of inconsequential branches, spaning all of the habitable world, language is passed along, in all methods and forms forced upon or chosen by, and is here now with and within everyone, including very simple and intricate copies with and within a lot of things. Through a one, two, three point reference, stone, papyrus and parchment, which if and when investigated will produce a great number of other one, two, three points. (Never reached and highly probable never to be reached as a consequence of being triggered into reaching that) The other example regards eating, and is much more complex to see it as that, and especially understand it as that, yet as very existing fact is uttilised precisely as that consciously and unconsciously by anyone, often by most anyone. One culture has preserved it in the best and most accurate way, and this is the Chinese culture. Almost all of the features of the service, eating and the cooking in Chinese culture make the example to fit perfectly and unnoticed by most, although used by all. It regards to a feature which if and when applied or noticed as happening is taken as anything but it's intricate complex and unknown triggered moment in history. The feature is the proximity a dish, any dish, which in itself is often a sub dish or only a part of a dish, including the utensils used to eat, is in regards to one's face and mouth. All of this, in regards to one, two or more people, round table, place, while speaking, not speaking, in regards to any occasion, age, sex or time. In order to sense the unknown consciousness with and within it as a happening, one can make use of it themselves, and while doing observe oneself, observe the silence, the joy, the excitement, the wonder etc etc and especially anger or a threatening volatile situation. Understanding this very simple yet highly complex, intricate and unknown triggered moment in history, one's consciousness completely unaware as a happening, will in most cases see the exact reality to which it is presented with, although it might look and behave completely different to that which it is, giving one an advantage or a disadvantage. Creating a state of being where it's senses, feelings, behaviour, emotions, incentives, rewards, trigger structures and extremely often actions are equal to that of a conflict, a physically violent conflict state of being, spreading its range to include a ever increasing habitable space throughout the world, has, is and will simultaneously force all possible types and forms of consciousness to nothing more but pass it through it's corresponding consequential equilibrium structure, achieving more and more numbness and consequently inevitable heirarchical jumps. I am simply pointing to actual existence. One only has to observe anything, be it a plant, creature, stream, element, and see directly that without no direct or indirect physical interaction such existence is already at a fluctuating motion by itself in search for that equilibrium which if and when happening is impossible to not sense it as beautiful. Even a stone, one can take a stone move it, and one has to wait for an eternity to see it as being in it's rightful place. This is the often state of being which is recognised as peace, a peaceful state, yet fluctuation, natural fluctuation is not peaceful, it can be harmful or not, and it is at such a balance where the few moments of peace can be deducted from and for. Adding the actual, or the plausible intention of introducing physical and mental violence on top of already fluctuating state of being goes beyond peace, and in doing so triggers it's corresponding consciousness form and type. Doing so under the presupposition of this is life's game, or this is how life is, is false, and not true. This means that while eating and not animal, one is eating and animal. That is how consciousness works, one cannot disguise the opposite of that which is presenting it as, which in the case of eating is eating, and confrontation is confrontation. All what one can do in order to see it, is to become eating itself and observe eating in turn as being that or something else. Which is exactly what confrontation does, by presenting itself as that which it is not, triggering itself on the other, and maintaining its false part within itself. Moments of peace within a fluctuating state of being are few and beautiful because such moments are difficult to achieve and be with, it requires often an infinite number of everything for such moments to occur, and an equally good infinite number of everything for such moments to be with. All is often neglected either by a constant introduction of disruptions in regards to the actual fluctuation to begin with, or the fact that everything which has level's of density, it already possess the ability to achieve such states of beautiful peace as itself. One can think how hard it is truly to make something beautiful, and upon doing so how hard it is for such beautiful to be among all other possible beautiful already in existence or to be made. The difference is simple and categorically important. Conflict relies on the ability of existence to adopt quickly, giving a possibility to use such quick adoption correctly or incorrectly . Natural fluctuation relies on the ability of existence reaching a equilibrium, as an ascending and descending heirarchical order through different levels and degrees. I believe the latter one to have more of everything whereas the first one only a uncertain end especially in regards to it as a conflictual quick adoption. A conflictual be it as existing or as introductory state requires for one to accept it as such and adopt, which in turn maintains it or increases it. That or accept it as something else and adopt, which maintains it, and increases it to a higher intensity. A fluctuating state is always existing and requires for one to also be existing with it, moving and waiting for that equilibrium in order to recognise it as beautiful, which in turn gives the ability to put it up with all other beautiful things and see where it stands as equilibrium, meaning is it really that. Regardless of denial science has always worked in two ways which are the known aplicabilities of consciousness, and there is only one country which applies one of such ways as it's rule of law foundation to this day. (With the caveat of a lot of people knowing and considering such state as an evil one). The ways are... (1) Being, stated as being, and proof of such state. (2) Stated as being, being what, and proof of what being. Logic, philosophy among other insignificant things fallow such a way. In understanding this, it is much easier to see where a conflictual attitude will benefit more than an equilibrium while fluctuating attitude. One gets you laid, the other everything gets laid. © EMIR May 9/2024

First part My attention in regards to scum and consequently understanding it the way I do, has enabled me to see the concept of peace in a different way. Within most cases peace indicates to the succession, that is the stopping of any type of animosities between two or more waring parties, and to the highest possible level, that it is, which upon enactment peace takes place. Yet as explained through the writing in regards to scum, peace, that is a state where no direct or indirect physical violent conflict is as happening, is already quite difficult. In fact within most cases, as anyone who lives and has ever lived to continue living will tell you, even show you, peace is almost anything but that, it only manifests itself as plausible structure in moments, often using the most magnificent points of reference in nature, such as the sun, moon, sky, season, river, sea, hill, field, forest and mountain. People with all types of attributes and characteristics are used as well, including humanly built structures among a myriad of other possible combinations. This means, in having as a general existence for anyone in the world, extremely few and very precious moments of peace, then attacking the normal day to day existence which such moments can be deducted off, by, for, from and to ability, talent, luck, faith, intuition, belief, logic etc etc of anyone and in regards to anyone, is an attack beyond peace, meaning there is a lot of work to get to any moment of peace long after the violent confrontation has stopped. Having been thinking about it for a lot of my existence, there is no words in any language to sentence it as a method, except as a direct and indirect deliberate attempt in achieving a state of being where any party involved can not be within a state of being in order of deducting any memorable moments of peace, only to be bypassed by a state of numbing physical state of existence, some sort of growing up a thicked skin and consequently peaceful state of being, only applicable in the regards to the context it is necessarily or unnecessarily induced from and for, a type of victory or symbolic victory, giving one the weird ability to see the beauty of a sunny day from a fighting positional state, thus achieving even more weird states of peaceful numbness having successfully applied some sort of retribution as a right or just measure. Consciousness which is and exists within and throughout everything, does not know what to make of that observation and consequently state of being. Having been triggered to such a state, consciousness has no other choice but to literally pass it, that is integrate it throughout all of physical existence available for none other than the old equilibrium state of being, the one which peace, moments of precious peace can be deducted from and for. Some types and forms of consciousness will reach such equilibrium or at least a form of, one which can be uttilised in many regards as quickly as reaching a flat surface after a steep one. On the other hand, some types and forms of consciousness require a whole ocean, forest, planet,, system, orbit, solar system etc etc. The most important ones, the ones which are not believable and consequently impossible to imagine in order to understand, with such types and forms of consciousness there is no reach of equilibrium. Once triggered the only equilibrium such types and forms of consciousness know by being, is a total jump of degree, order, level and heirarchical ascent or descent, which means everything, making peace a problem, a requirement not applicable, thus completely ignored and not aimed for, as it only exists once a jump is made, having been triggered in none existence at its corresponding state. © EMIR MAY 9/2024

Fourth part In order to see to what I am aiming to refer and describe with words, it's plausible span in a possible measured time, one can use information that of which is known in regards to Egypt's dynasties. Taking such a record of history, then a application in regards to language one can apply to it. In doing so, one will soon clearly see a very early period where language is a written in stone, stone tablets quite often, a method which was adopted by Mesopotamia, Rome and Greece later. After that, not long, a period where language is a written in papyrus appears simultaneously with the one in stone, and a conflict is there to deliberate. After that a introduction through conflict arrives from the opposite side of the Mediterranean, introducing a new addition, where language is a written in parchment, simultaneously with the one in stone and papyrus, and a conflict is there to deliberate again. After that the same introduction where language is a written in parchment which first appears from the opposite of the Mediterranean, is reintroduced from the side of Egypt, through a conflict, and a conflict is there also to deliberate, all the way to actual paper and the digital present. Throughout all of the example given, including all of inconsequential branches, spaning all of the habitable world, language is passed along, in all methods and forms forced upon or chosen by, and is here now with and within everyone, including very simple and intricate copies with and within a lot of things. Through a one, two, three point reference, stone, papyrus and parchment, which if and when investigated will produce a great number of other one, two, three points. (Never reached and highly probable never to be reached as a consequence of being triggered into reaching that) The other example regards eating, and is much more complex to see it as that, and especially understand it as that, yet as very existing fact is uttilised precisely as that consciously and unconsciously by anyone, often by most anyone. One culture has preserved it in the best and most accurate way, and this is the Chinese culture. Almost all of the features of the service, eating and the cooking in Chinese culture make the example to fit perfectly and unnoticed by most, although used by all. It regards to a feature which if and when applied or noticed as happening is taken as anything but it's intricate complex and unknown triggered moment in history. The feature is the proximity a dish, any dish, which in itself is often a sub dish or only a part of a dish, including the utensils used to eat, is in regards to one's face and mouth. All of this, in regards to one, two or more people, round table, place, while speaking, not speaking, in regards to any occasion, age, sex or time. In order to sense the unknown consciousness with and within it as a happening, one can make use of it themselves, and while doing observe oneself, observe the silence, the joy, the excitement, the wonder etc etc and especially anger or a threatening volatile situation. Understanding this very simple yet highly complex, intricate and unknown triggered moment in history, one's consciousness completely unaware as a happening, will in most cases see the exact reality to which it is presented with, although it might look and behave completely different to that which it is, giving one an advantage or a disadvantage. Creating a state of being where it's senses, feelings, behaviour, emotions, incentives, rewards, trigger structures and extremely often actions are equal to that of a conflict, a physically violent conflict state of being, spreading its range to include a ever increasing habitable space throughout the world, has, is and will simultaneously force all possible types and forms of consciousness to nothing more but pass it through it's corresponding consequential equilibrium structure, achieving more and more numbness and consequently inevitable heirarchical jumps. I am simply pointing to actual existence. One only has to observe anything, be it a plant, creature, stream, element, and see directly that without no direct or indirect physical interaction such existence is already at a fluctuating motion by itself in search for that equilibrium which if and when happening is impossible to not sense it as beautiful. Even a stone, one can take a stone move it, and one has to wait for an eternity to see it as being in it's rightful place. This is the often state of being which is recognised as peace, a peaceful state, yet fluctuation, natural fluctuation is not peaceful, it can be harmful or not, and it is at such a balance where the few moments of peace can be deducted from and for. Adding the actual, or the plausible intention of introducing physical and mental violence on top of already fluctuating state of being goes beyond peace, and in doing so triggers it's corresponding consciousness form and type. Doing so under the presupposition of this is life's game, or this is how life is, is false, and not true. This means that while eating and not animal, one is eating and animal. That is how consciousness works, one cannot disguise the opposite of that which is presenting it as, which in the case of eating is eating, and confrontation is confrontation. All what one can do in order to see it, is to become eating itself and observe eating in turn as being that or something else. Which is exactly what confrontation does, by presenting itself as that which it is not, triggering itself on the other, and maintaining its false part within itself. Moments of peace within a fluctuating state of being are few and beautiful because such moments are difficult to achieve and be with, it requires often an infinite number of everything for such moments to occur, and an equally good infinite number of everything for such moments to be with. All is often neglected either by a constant introduction of disruptions in regards to the actual fluctuation to begin with, or the fact that everything which has level's of density, it already possess the ability to achieve such states of beautiful peace as itself. One can think how hard it is truly to make something beautiful, and upon doing so how hard it is for such beautiful to be among all other possible beautiful already in existence or to be made. The difference is simple and categorically important. Conflict relies on the ability of existence to adopt quickly, giving a possibility to use such quick adoption correctly or incorrectly . Natural fluctuation relies on the ability of existence reaching a equilibrium, as an ascending and descending heirarchical order through different levels and degrees. I believe the latter one to have more of everything whereas the first one only a uncertain end especially in regards to it as a conflictual quick adoption. A conflictual be it as existing or as introductory state requires for one to accept it as such and adopt, which in turn maintains it or increases it. That or accept it as something else and adopt, which maintains it, and increases it to a higher intensity. A fluctuating state is always existing and requires for one to also be existing with it, moving and waiting for that equilibrium in order to recognise it as beautiful, which in turn gives the ability to put it up with all other beautiful things and see where it stands as equilibrium, meaning is it really that. Regardless of denial science has always worked in two ways which are the known aplicabilities of consciousness, and there is only one country which applies one of such ways as it's rule of law foundation to this day. (With the caveat of a lot of people knowing and considering such state as an evil one). The ways are... (1) Being, stated as being, and proof of such state. (2) Stated as being, being what, and proof of what being. Logic, philosophy among other insignificant things fallow such a way. In understanding this, it is much easier to see where a conflictual attitude will benefit more than an equilibrium while fluctuating attitude. One gets you laid, the other everything gets laid. © EMIR May 9/2024

Third part My attention in regards to scum and consequently understanding it the way I do, has enabled me to see the concept of peace in a different way. Within most cases peace indicates to the succession, that is the stopping of any type of animosities between two or more waring parties, and to the highest possible level, that it is, which upon enactment peace takes place. Yet as explained through the writing in regards to scum, peace, that is a state where no direct or indirect physical violent conflict is as happening, is already quite difficult. In fact within most cases, as anyone who lives and has ever lived to continue living will tell you, even show you, peace is almost anything but that, it only manifests itself as plausible structure in moments, often using the most magnificent points of reference in nature, such as the sun, moon, sky, season, river, sea, hill, field, forest and mountain. People with all types of attributes and characteristics are used as well, including humanly built structures among a myriad of other possible combinations. This means, in having as a general existence for anyone in the world, extremely few and very precious moments of peace, then attacking the normal day to day existence which such moments can be deducted off, by, for, from and to ability, talent, luck, faith, intuition, belief, logic etc etc of anyone and in regards to anyone, is an attack beyond peace, meaning there is a lot of work to get to any moment of peace long after the violent confrontation has stopped. Having been thinking about it for a lot of my existence, there is no words in any language to sentence it as a method, except as a direct and indirect deliberate attempt in achieving a state of being where any party involved can not be within a state of being in order of deducting any memorable moments of peace, only to be bypassed by a state of numbing physical state of existence, some sort of growing up a thicked skin and consequently peaceful state of being, only applicable in the regards to the context it is necessarily or unnecessarily induced from and for, a type of victory or symbolic victory, giving one the weird ability to see the beauty of a sunny day from a fighting positional state, thus achieving even more weird states of peaceful numbness having successfully applied some sort of retribution as a right or just measure. Consciousness which is and exists within and throughout everything, does not know what to make of that observation and consequently state of being. Having been triggered to such a state, consciousness has no other choice but to literally pass it, that is integrate it throughout all of physical existence available for none other than the old equilibrium state of being, the one which peace, moments of precious peace can be deducted from and for. Some types and forms of consciousness will reach such equilibrium or at least a form of, one which can be uttilised in many regards as quickly as reaching a flat surface after a steep one. On the other hand, some types and forms of consciousness require a whole ocean, forest, planet,, system, orbit, solar system etc etc. The most important ones, the ones which are not believable and consequently impossible to imagine in order to understand, with such types and forms of consciousness there is no reach of equilibrium. Once triggered the only equilibrium such types and forms of consciousness know by being, is a total jump of degree, order, level and heirarchical ascent or descent, which means everything, making peace a problem, a requirement not applicable, thus completely ignored and not aimed for, as it only exists once a jump is made, having been triggered in none existence at its corresponding state.

The key problem here is that entities like government or people in a position that they believe is one of power, hate the fact that the parents should have the only say in their child’s treatment! There is no possible way of trying to say that anyone has a right to a child’s health care choices outside of the parent’s without proving that the parent has that authority first and foremost. If they have it first and foremost then there is no discussion on anyone else having any say at all!

Second part Within both cases, scum is extremely present, this means one can be it, carry it, take it, give it, avoid it, buy it, sell it, steal it, be afraid of it, join it, adopt it as a profesion, as skill, have it as obstacle, addiction, desire, fetish, collect it, clean it, be drawn to it, be disgusted by it, be healed and protected by it, die and develop disease from it, profit from it, suffer and get punished for it, get poisoned by it, get nourished from it. It can even be as a race, colour, religion, ideology, sex, nationality, education, behaviour and age. It is always at hand to be deployed as a thought, logically wished heart fully, and believed consciously. It as a name will be directed and undirected through as many other supposedly uncorrelated names, which ultimately state the core underlying structure of scum, be it the direct empirical physical one, or the direct concept as a physical manifestation, nonetheless both cases empirical one. As it physically can be seen and through the linguistic explanation given and referred here, I, myself, throughout all of my life I have had absolutely no problem with scum as a consequence of its very in the present physical form of being, making it pointless and impossible to have a problem with, be the one as a direct physical form or the concept physical form. Meaning ....I have been one, often I am one, I know one and one knows me, I have eaten one, one has eaten me, slept with and as one, stolen one, have one stolen from me, run towards one, way from another, overpowered one, and been very afraid and overpowered by another, I have lied as one, and told of another as one, I am to my family, friends and strangers as one, and family, friends and strangers are to me as one, I walk as one on one, my house is full of, I clean lots form it, other places I go are exactly the same, I wash off some, and don't wash off any, I could die from one, and one could die from me as one, I have and most likely will believe and love one, and one has and most likely will believe and love me as one, and on and on. The problem and my whole focus regards to something else altogether, the else I am extremely attentive towards by now, in regards to scum, and this can only be described, worded and explained with one word, a very none existing existing word, being the one imagine, which if and when "thought" over, automatically gives a different something else to scum, with the else part being none existing, which is(imaginary scum). Imaginary scum is by far the most extreme, complex, intricate, complicated completely in the shadows as a shadow, moving faster than the wind none existing concept I am aware and conscious off at my degree and level. One which always manifests physically but it is impossible to state so, simply because of the imaginary shield part, making it nonsensical if and when doing so, that is declaring it as scum. For most of my life the present physical existence part of being is what I was taught and learned to look out for in regards to scum, and within many cases, be rightly or wrongly afraid off, neglecting and ridiculing often the imaginary part. Now I have changed my way of thinking. I am still attentive and look out for the physical existence part of being while simultaneously being rightly or wrongly afraid off, but the imaginary part of scum has made a serious understandable impression and consequential impact, one from which there is no turning back now. The most impressive part of the imaginary scum regards to it not having the illegality or the sinful part applicable to it, simply because it is imaginary, meaning it does not exist, which in turn you cannot call it a sinn or even right and wrong. Within the most categorical simple terms, this is presented and is used as holy, clean, just, morally right, light, honest, truth, beautiful, correct and much much more. It is fascinating, it achieves in doing so by taking a, any and all possible combinations of physically present scum and applying the imaginary part to all of it making disappear just like that, which really discriminates against anyone who has ever attempted to clean scum, be it theirs or others with their own hands. Whereas the physically present part of scum cannot do that, simply because it is there always present, in fact it does not need or even try to do that if and when it is truly existing. Day after day wether static or moving as a life form it is there and wether one considers it holy, clean, just, morally right, light, honest, truth, beautiful, correct and much much more or absolutely not, it makes no difference at all in it's regards, only in regards to anyone involved with considering. Thousands of years ago, one could become scum automatically simply through association, because of the imaginary concept part, in fact the thought process still exists under the supposedly most logical sentence (show me whom you are staying with, and I will tell you who you are.) Imagine asking and saying that to a rubbish collector, or a morg operator during a pandemic. Thousands of years ago, one could be literal out casted from all possible cultural settings simply by association with musicians, dancer's, stone workers, shepherds, farmers, fisherman, prostitute's, even tax collectors, and who knows how many other peofesions which automatically included the illegality, sinful and disease part simultaneously making one extremely unholy scum. Yet everyone had no choice but to make use of a, any and all possible combinations of services deriving of the illegal, sinful and diseased scum, and this can only be achieved through applying the imaginary part of and when required to do so. Making the imaginary part more powerful and more dangerous than the physical part, in fact I now considered it to be the truly illegal, sinful and diseased part off and by a, any and all possible combinations of actual physical scum existing structures. Imaginary scum is so powerful and dangerous that it can take, in fact it has taken all what was considered physical in structure scum, and turned it into imaginary scum, meaning it has taken the illegality, sinful and the diseased part away from, leaving a, any and all possible combinations of always existing physical in structure scum prepetualy stuck in being as such, always illegal, always sinful, and always diseased. Now imagine sin saying to sin you are sin, crime saying to crime you are crime, and disease saying to disease you are disease. At such a point even the old most reliable drawing a line on the ground and saying...(He who is without sin let them throw the first stone) sentence is of no use anymore, because it simply means suicide, being that more likely than not, anyone holding a stone, is under the imaginary scum concept of being as such, leaving the very physical held stone to do nothing else but fallow its logical physical existence part. As off now imaginary scum is being given as a civilisation must, presented and taken for an antidote to physical existence scum, discriminating against one and elevating one. With the strange part of one existing no matter what and the other not being there until. There is another part which makes imaginary scum even more powerful and dangerous and this regards to the build up structure and concept. Physical scum can only do so much build up, before it is addressed in either natural transformation or correction. Imaginary scum can surpass such built up to unimaginable levels and degrees simply because it is imaginary until the physical parts doing and being highly involved in the imaginary part, suddenly, with the sudden part appearing as a suprise supposedly, logically, through faith, believe, premonition etc etc considers a, any and all possible combinations of physical manifestations to such imagined imaginary parts, a very must in existence, and in being within possession of extreme levels and degrees of power, and danger, such manifestations often resemble just like war and conflicts. I am aware and conscious of this because I finally think it would be useful for myself at a certain point said and thought anyone, to adopt a most imaginary scum structure like most, meaning apply the imaginative part accordingly and correspondingly, while always keeping a lookout for the physical existence part of being. Which as it stands and offered means everyone for themselves, the law accordingly and God for everyone. That is as imaginary imagine one can physically be, including the problem of because being is not imaginary, it can be, yet it is not, it never is. © E.D May 8 2024

First part My full attention at this point will be to give a different way, I believe it to be a natural way of seeing scum. I have always been drawn and attention triggered by scum, plus on top of that I have spent much of my existence seriously understanding it, not in a more or less then others type of meaning as I do not wish to brag about any such achievement as a medal, nor I would like anyone to do so in my direction, thus avoiding an awkward confrontational argument as to who it is the one that understands scum more, but a understanding be it simple or complex is what I aim. Scum as an English word has no match in regards to other similar words from other languages, I believe it to be a most underrated word although highly and very often used. In regards to myself if and when I have required a very specific and precise word to singly occupy my entire mind, as a hybrid meditation type of technique, scum and the word scum, has by far been the most successful one. It might not feel so, especially if and when considering the incorrect use of the word scum, but it is the main foundation which supports most, if not all of what I have written, backwards. I believe after I have written in it's regards, to it, as a word and concept, many might use it, and most probably use it exactly as a hybrid meditation type of technique. Scum in regards to empirical terms is a highly physical concentrated concern, solidified, liquified, oilified, through temperature increase and decrease, humidity increase and decrease, wind friction and all its possible directional movement as a, any and all possible combinations of particles, some of which are extremely small, all the way to small, known often and recognised as dust. As a concern giving it direct a consequence, scum can be anywhere the conditions enable and disable it, with the best example being none other than within the very physical existence, one which is inescapable in regards to anyone alive or dead, which in this case being is anyone's nose that is.. In fact anyone's nose is built as physical existence purposely, simply, and as importantly in order to not allow scum reach the immune system, which means to protect ones life from inescapable existence. Based on that, in regards and to all possible technical terms, all matter is a ascending and descending degree and level of density scum. All one has to do in order to have an example, is stick their own finger up their own nose and investigate, that is dig a bit lighter or bit harder, all depending on the quantity and quality of the scum in existence up their own nose, pick some up and pull it out. Upon doing so, a considerable or not, quantity of scum will be right there on their own finger to observe, and knowing myself to have been as a child, even taste it. As a concept supported by and off lateral physical structures, in this case biological structures, while simultaneously keeping as a constant initiation, development, maintenance, and enactment, scum is highly representable through human beings. In terms and regards to human beings scum uses two very distinct yet overlapping categories, one is wholly regarded to direct and indirect illegality, concerning a, any and all possible combinations of legal systems, while the other is wholly regarded to direct and indirect religious, faith, beliefs, ideology and morals representable most likely in the form of sinn or as a sinn. This means that almost all of the instances the criminality of scum is simultaneously the sinful side of scum, making all crime a sinn. It precisely because such a magnificent overall possible structure, the importance to myself, regards my extremely attentive and personal involvement with scum. It a way of learning about law as a side hustle.

This is an excellent 360-degree discourse by Prof Ida at Cambridge on the AI Legal Framework and Personhood Theories for strategic and innovation consideration in the new Internet Community......Jeong Chun Phuoc

First of all I want to thank you, for the conversation, debate and the points presented as issues and possible solutions, I have had to listen to the talk for quite a few times, over and over. What I will comment on it's regards, I believe to have done so a thousand and one different ways. Some points of disclosure before I proceed with the comment, which are................ (If a was a Julius I would never write or say the comment at its full context, if I was a Augustus on the other hand, I would do so at a much more emphasized way and method.) With disclosures out of the way, I will also inform you that I have spent a lot of my period involved in direct communicative English, being completely oblivious to the word (mate) in regards to it's meaning, instead of such word, the word (mik) as in the name, was uttilised. This means that for all that period a, any and all possible combinations of (mate's) to me and in regards to my existence, were all (miks) instead. Now being the debate relates to the (Alister) clause, I cannot help but comment and express my opinion like everyone else involved. First of all you should all stop in calling it an (Alister) clause, it is not going to make anyone sound more German than they actually are or might be. Instead of an (ouester) clause definition, the prevent mutiny clause or simply (mutiny clause) should be used instead. Second, a country, any country is not a ship, in fact a ship is not a ship unless it is. A journey is not a country also. So it goes for security services within a journey, that also is not a country. In fact a raiding party, a trading party and a hoarding party are not a country equally. Which points to the fact that a treaty, contract or agreement is not a constitution, in fact a treaty, contract or agreement is all three simultaneously at the same time, yet still it is not a constitution.

Only Britain can say Britain is safe, and it does so by making sure it's parliamentary monarchy system achieves such state of safety which it as a state of Britain can say it is. In that, common law and parliamentary sovereignty is included fully and independently functional. The manipulation of either one is where the money is. Which means any other countries are not safe, if and when Britain says so, it is how foreign ministries advice, and operate, as a necessary must. It also how insurance and securities industries operate. Oh shnuc I just realised, I don't have an insurance policy. 😅

Speaking of common chord progressions, I composed an arrangement of Hark the Herald Angels simultaneously sung with the Hebrew blessing over the Hanukah candles, using the traditional Hark harmony!

Can we have the access to the slides? Thank you for the lecture!

This case served to trigger a necessary unity, indirectly coerced through a direct judiciary method. That is the weakness of any unwritten constitution, which is nonetheless lurking within any written constitution. (With the word necessary refering to the current or any understanding of the term Rule of Law...) The rule of law has two structural rules which it has no other choice but to fallow. The first rule of law regards to being, existence, the actual physical matter and mass. The second rule of law regards to representing the first rule in and as a template, usually as and within the form of language. The failure regards to any start point A not correlating with the whole process of the rule of law. This means that either only the first rule is applied, or only the second rule is applied, in total or partiality. It works by taking a general state of being which is supported by a more specific linguistic template, or in reverse a more specific state of being which is supposed by a more general state of being. Equally it works by taking a very general linguistic template which is supported by a more specific state of being, or in reverse a very specific linguistic template which is supported by a more general state of being. This will remain the main and most crucial problem in regards to any justice system.

You'll own nothing and be happy, not even your imagination.

A game, any game, all possible combinations of games work as such. Think in regards to being, existence in all of its possible ways one can think, apply constraints, constrictions and limits as ways and methods to such being, and a set of, or a particular action will have (N) possible combinations. Being that game requires to always pick one, that will lead to an (N) result which according to the constraints, constrictions, and limits applied as a (N) start to an (N) end, can and will be taken as forwarded advantage or a forwarded disadvantage off and by the game. The crucial part is this, it is the actual being itself which is applying the game with its set constraints, constrictions and limits by and off it self, to it self, which requires off and by itself to fallow as itself. This means the concept of being intelligent applies only and only to begin, always. To collect, take, save, hold enormous amounts of a, any and all possible combinations of copies (called data) off and by being, apply constraints, constrictions and limits in order to produce (N) results through an (N) start to (N) end which can then be forwarded as an advantage or disadvantage to actual being should be illegal within most ascending and descending levels and degrees of existing order, especially if and when such (called data) correspond directly to life forms, as in the case of human beings, landscape, water, wind, or the usual physical and living stuff. It should be illegal not out of anyone's want, but because it is already illegal for most police forces, judicial systems, education and health systems, employees, and civilians, in fact the most feared intelligence agencies have such illegality applicable to their system, or the intelligence part has to be given up. Never in the history of mankind has such structure been forwarded as a possible solution to humanities problem, not in such a way or such a scale. If this were to be forwarded by the Nazi, Fascist, Dictatorial or any other similar in operating system, and upon asking an admission is the most likely outcome, a categorical denial would be instead, and such denial would be right and proven through documentation. With an extreme interest by and off such systems to use this new structure instead of their old one. In most simplest digital terms, if and when any game requires an x command for example as a change of circumstances, it means the game is already set to react to such an x command through an (N) start to an (N) end, that is how all games work, and none of such games are intelligent. On the other hand, if and when one swaps the requirement of an x command within the exact same game with a, any and all possible combinations of lateral life, physical existence or the usual living stuff, such as millions of possible face angles for example as a change of circumstances, the game will proceed exactly as it has been set through an (N) start to an (N) end. Such a game is always not intelligent, and will remain so always. Because it is not the game learning but the always changing circumstances of being, it is a bugger but that how being is. In such a circumstance one is faced with an intelligence agency as a operating system for day to day life or instead a democracy. The democracies insisting one is the other and the other is the other one, are in most simplest terms incorrect, in fact are not democratic at all be it left, right, middle or coloured, simple based on the fact that none democracies do not insist so, unless advantageous or disadvantageous to do so. Coercing crucial part of state and government structures, civil society, private or even the civilian public, to think games are intelligent even as a artificial term or supposed construction, first all it should be illegal, then once presented as games, at minimum strict levels of illegality should be applicable as it usually is, unless everyone has given up. One might call it (Information Technology Solution Games) (ITSG) © Emir Doçaj April 19/2024

Very clear explanations. Thanks.

Stolen Babies Period ! So Wales Is An Experimental Area ! However Tony Blair Who Initiated The Whole Aspect Of Enforcing Forced U.K Adoption ! HORRIBLE MAN ......

There is no rule of law. Theres institutional criminality and then theres the way to public get treated

Is it lawful to use a civil court to process a criminal claim. Do crimes have to have a victim? Are the Magistrates administrative courts?

A must watch for anyone interested in EU Law. Very informative and engaging. Bravo!

Very helpful and informative. I'd love your thoughts on private LLM's with T&C's on human led subject matter expert content. - Perhaps you are aware of what Morgan Stanley and Vodafone are doing don't this? Happy to discuss. I've sent you a linkedIn request. Cheers

End all food and drink deliveries into the Borough of Westminster. Stop feeding the beast.

This is an incredible lecture that simplifies structured finance a great deal. Thanks for posting it! :)

Thank you. There is so little for parents on this subject.

I am a south indian. I want to do llm at cambridge university. What should I do inorder to get an admission? Please reply

Excellent

It is difficult to understand

Are not the people sovereign over parliament?