Proclamation Threat Declaration Allegory Building Okay Glass break Approach to breaking glass Suffix 🇧🇪 Idiom 🐝 Allegory about someone 🗑🔥 Affirmation Exploaion Gaddafi Prefix Big thing badly Job nobody wants Phrase Bricks trucks Insult Alma mater Proclamation Job Idgad Insult I'm not your [____] Thought Description Exclamation Plea Compliment 🥛 Youknowhatimsayin Timely conversation starter Der it izz Patriotism ⭐️ Looks like>It is Stance Exclamation Phrase Friendlessness Threat Insomnia Deadbeat dad Medicine Hmm? J Names Okay Hit-and-run name محمد المحمد بن بزير I feel you Question on age 29 Stfu Ily Phrase Similar Insult Welcome to the NFL Rosebuds Snuff film Cocktail party joke 🐟 Reacting Know-it-all Prefix Suffix God bless Murica
See, this just makes me wanna see a Sorkin Star Trek series more. Imagine Gauron saying "If you haven't seen Macbeth on a K'Tinga battleship, then you haven't seen Shakespeare the way it was meant to be done."
1:49 Hate to be dat guy but you missed one: President Bartlet says "for reasons passing understanding" talking about a school banning Shakespeare's Twelfth Night one episode when he got Donna's old school teacher on the phone. I can't remember when or what episode, though
Phrase Back-and-forth Threat turned into a gloat Command thinly veiled as a threat Sentiment Quotation Sentence Phrase Quotation Command Sentiment Slap Skeletal Formula filled in with relevant words Cutesy name Command Phrase Expletive accompanied by an identical physical action Command Imitating a chicken Threat Sentiment, also mixed into a command Negative description Question Skeletal sentence Prefix Suffix Rhetorical question Sentence Conversation with the same likely misstep and possibility of not making that mistake Prefix Identical daddy issues Short sentence Frustrated sentence Deepening back-and-forth Encouragement Confident sentiment Correction Question Quoting Tom Hanks Sentiment Suffix Sentiment Craving Insult Question Snarky question involving prenoms Snarky observation Encouraging quip Sentiment stating resilience and endurance Simile Snarky question Metaphor Another metaphor Similie streamlining to a suffix Identical scenario with slight alterations Identical irreconcilable difference in different hats Sentence Raspberry Exclaimed inquiry Command Hateful sentiment Halting sentence Simile Sentiment fin
So this guy recycles the same dialogues, throughout his carrear... and everybody finds that great ??? Really ? Come on people... Imagine: Mozart repeating again again again the same notes, Van painting the same thing for ever, a scientist doing the same experiment for years... I stop watching at 1:19...
I think Emily is painted as being overly antagonistic, over-bearing, over-stepping the mark, etc. In other words, Emily is often painted in an unsympathetic light, but Emily deeply loves Richard, Lorelei and Rory. It's amazing how neurotic Lorelei is with her mother and father. It's like she is frozen in time as the 16-year-old teenage who with an illegitimate bastard child which the writers of the show never bring up but that would be the logical reason Rory wasn't good enough for the Huntsburgers. Emily was the traditional upper class executive's wife. She built her social circle to expand Richard's network of contacts while Richard handled the business and together, they worked as a team. Emily performed her traditional role. What you have is a display of the pre-1960s traditional America (that ignored the 1960s new culture) and then you have Lorelei and Rory who are part of the post 1960s culture. Thats why the gap is so wide between Emily and Lorelei. Emily was devoted to Richard and its very touching to get to portray such an intimate moment in someone's life. There is a lesson in here. The pre-1960s traditional roles and values meant that neither of them was ever alone, not in sickness and not in death. Lorelei and Rory's generation can't seem to put together a relationship or keep it which is very apt for today's post 1960s new culture...and it's getting worse. It means that a lot of the post 1960s generations will be living alone and getting sick alone and dying alone.
On one hand: Yes. Sorkin is quite guilty of recycling material. (Between this and the first there are actually some things missed.) But I don’t know if I’d extend it to “my gosh! People have said “from time to time” many times in his screenplays!” Yes, as have people on Earth. Also, he should get an exemption for “for reasons passing understanding”. That’s just a great phrase, put it where you can, you know?
Sorkin takes a lot of flack for being a bit hokey, and I understand that, but his heart is always in the right place. If there is anything my country needs right now, raising the level of public debate is certainly something that would be welcomed. Maybe Aaron Sorkin can help us find some truth in a post-truth political landscape.
