also super embarrassing that you can get a freeze frame of the ball being picked by Canterbury defender @02:19...at clear sock/shin pad height...but also - he's significantly more than 5metres away for a shot at goal to be rule lifted dangerous...it's a miss pick by Canterbury and it should have been a goal. Umpire gets in a muddle with positioning, vision blocked by 5 players and reliant on colleague who's got it entirely wrong. Makes up for allowing Reading to kick one in for 2-0 though I guess.
Wee bit embarrassing for an NPUA umpire to be stood 3 metres from and staring straight at the foot that kicked in Reading's second goal. You can even get a freeze frame of it @01:31 with the ball perfectly sat on the right ankle of second reading deflecting player before it gets kicked into the goal. Wa-wa-waaaaaa. Fail.
Despite the PC/Drags being allowed when at least one didn't leave the circle, good job Surbiton took the shuttles outcome after somehow @04:46 wasn't a PS.
@04:17 - freeze...clearly see ball stopped on circle line. Hasn't left the circle. Probably the same for the previous PC goal immediately before but not as clear to be certain. Umpires just not bothering to pay attention to their lines. This PC had more 13.3(g) issues with multiple defenders clearly inside the field of play at point of injection. Seen clearly @04:04
@02:46 - how's that not a PC? GK save raises past the earhole of Wimbledon attacker. Ump signals 16, changes to LC, but misses the obvious PC award. (Clap)
@02:09 - Wimbledon far post runner, pushing off front of goal post, and clearly visible at least two defenders on goal line. (13.3(g) breached - should be retaken with one less defender, same as an early break away)
@01:35 - soon as injection starts, blip and send the far post defender back to half way - 13.3(g) infringement. Having said that - second castle stopper and far attacking runner are infringinging inside circle (line is inside) contravening 13.39e) meaning injector goes. Just poor procedural management all round.
