This is my personal channel. All opinions are my own.
Learn how to simplify workflows and expand your knowledge in literature searching and evidence synthesis. On this channel, you'll find tutorials about methodology, database searching, citation management, consumer health, and more.
I have been a medical librarian for over 11 years, working with teams on evidence synthesis projects such as systematic and scoping reviews.
🔽 CONNECT WITH ME - Official web site: carrieprice78.github.io/ - LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/carrieprice78/ - Twitter: twitter.com/carrieprice78 - Bsky: bsky.app/profile/carrieprice.bsky.social
🙏 REQUEST VIDEOS carrieprice78.github.io/ using the contact form at the bottom
🙌 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL - Like, share, and subscribe! - Buy me a coffee: ko-fi.com/carrieprice78
Hi Carrie, I know my question is unrelated to the topic. Can you please guide me into finding pre and post knowledge test surveys that have been validated that are maybe based on a theoretical framework. Thank you.
Awesome video and I like that you drew attention to the first item in the checklist - that reviewers should identify the report as a systematic review in the title. That doesn't always happen in published reviews!
It would have been interesting to see the difference in the number of results with the [tiab] vs [tw] without the Mesh terms included. Otherwise a really interesting video.
Another great video from you, very clear and effective. I have a question: in this kind of mono-source search, especially in Scopus, is deduplication necessary? I have not seen any of your videos on this topic, sorry if I missed it. I'd appreciate your help with this question.
Very informative! I wish I found this video (and channel) earlier. Indeed, during a review about agricultural robotics I was naively using the TIT-ABS-KEY search tag, founding too many unrelated results. Only going in-depth I realized the difference between KEY and AUTHKEY daviderizzophd.wordpress.com/2021/05/27/what-are-the-engineering-controlled-terms-in-scopus-a-key-misunderstanding/ By relevant, I mean document actually containing the searched terms.
I Carrie, I know this is off the topic. Can you please help me find a continuous quality improvement article or articles that have to do with pre-exposure prophylaxis in men who have sex with men. I tried to use the JBI, but maybe I am doing something wrong. Thank you.
I gotta say your channel is single handedly saving my inept ass at research. I am getting so many useful results through your tips and tricks, I really appreciate it!
Awesome video Carrie! I was literally using this site today for the Scopus clinical trials filter, and the one to exclude PubMed, Medline and Embase records from Scopus. Now I'd like to look more closely at some of the other ones.
No, I would not use the PRISMA Flow Diagram alone for drafting the methodology of a systematic review. Check out the SR Accelerator's Methods Wizard for more detailed methods help: sr-accelerator.com/#/methods-wizard
There may be, but I am not aware of it for exporting a large batch of citations, which is what I'm doing here. For individual articles or a handful of individual articles, I believe there is an extension.
Your reasons should be categorized, so i.e. Excluded for reason, take a look at this example: journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0304745
Dont understand the differencce betwen studies included in review and reports of included studies, can you please explain that? What is a report of the study?
I think it is a little confusing -- but let's say you find 10 published papers, but they are on only 8 studies, so i.e. maybe there are papers that report on the same study. In the synthesis, you would only include the results of the study once. Therefore you have 8 included studies, not 10 published papers. Hope that helps!
@@carrieprice78I tried doing that but it doesn’t let u download from the classic view website. Just brings up to a page telling u how to download as a CSV or JSON
yeah but you just explained how to fill the boxes with made up numbers, thats a bit misleading, if there was a reference to an image of the search engine used and how to get those numbers it would be bit more helpful.
