This channel provides math tutorials from basic arithmetic through calculus III and beyond. I integrate the videos into my courses taught with open educational resources at no cost to students.
You can view a complete list of videos at www.mathispower4u.com or search them on my blog at www.mathispower4u.wordpress.com.
@@Mathispower4u The chances after leaving yourself with a car and a goat is 50/50, and there's no proof against it possible. Mathematically it's a complete slur.
The videos that came with my homework (online course) didn't explain what's actually going on in these types of problems and either the textbook wasn't clear or I couldn't understand it... I clicked on a few other YT videos on the subject, but watching your video is what helped me to understand--thank you!!
Makes sure you are using a negative and not the minus sign if you are entering exactly as I did. If you want to use the minus, try entering 93(1/240)-5(239/240).
Can we say ".33..." equals 1/3. Like a politician, we sure can. Just don't mention we are leaving something out. ".33..." equals the incomplete and imprecise division of 1 by 3. We could also find a circular algorithm to somehow cancel out the infinity x=".33..." times 10 10x="3,33..."? plus x 11x="3.66..." divide by 11 x=".33..." the infinity is still there. How about x=".99..." times 10 10x="9.99...? plus x 11x="10.99...? Divide by 11 x=".99..." I must be doing something wrong. Can't get rid of the infinity. If I change the add to subtract, divide by 9 instead of 11, what is the mathic that gets rid of infinity.
@@Mathispower4u I addressed two of those reasons. The third is the sum of a geometric series. The sum of a finite geometric series is precise. The sum of an infinite geometric series is the limit of the sum of its partial sums. This more to the core of the controversy, infinity, and how math handles an infinity of values. A quick, intuitive refutation of the sum of infinite geometric series is to add an infinite amount of terms that have a value greater than zero and expect a precise value. What is next. The Archimedean property. A result of the property is that there is always real number values between real numbers. 1-".99..." is greater than 0. This again can be shown intuitively as true is the result of constructing real numbers in bases of Natural numbers. In base 10, ".99..." is the closest representation to the real number value of 1; 1/10^n. In each number base higher there is a real number base b closer to 1; 1/b^n. My intuition is based on high-school math basics that don't change through real number math. Also on a large number of math texts, mostly Calculus and a variety math subjects. This controversy has recently shifted to saying that ".99..." is 1 (mid twentieth century) This controversy I feel is connected to the continuum hypothesis.
One factory employs 35 male and 20 female workers. The factory owner wanted to form A social committee for male and female workers with 5 randomly selected members: What is the probability that the chairman of the committee , Vice-Chairman of the Committee and the treasurer are male workers, and the other members are from female Workers?
Nice video! Just wanted to clarify- shouldn’t we multiply the second component for continuous interest by interest ‘r’ in order to find rate of change of balance pursuant to deposits?
Thanks very much, but then it means the statements are true both ways, that is, (A implies B) and (B implies A), or either (P and Q) are both true or are both false, (P and Q) or -(P and Q). So what is the negatation of this statement. Thanks
i think i have the best explanation. Think of it this way: there are 3 people. they all chose a different door. which means that one of them chose correctly, the others didn't. so when the host reveals the other wrong door, 2 of the 3 people will benefit from switching. meaning the chance is 2/3. hope this helped
They have a combined total of 2/3 not a seperate... If one door is removed, you remove a number from the 3..because there is no longer 3. Lets say i choose yellow door, if its right and i switch to blue , i lose a million
If you have common sense and a basic understanding of logic, the chances are now evenly distributed between the door you originally chose and the door you switch to
i think i have the best explanation. Think of it this way: there are 3 people. they all chose a different door. which means that one of them chose correctly, the others didn't. so when the host reveals the other wrong door, 2 of the 3 people will benefit from switching. meaning the chance is 2/3. hope this helped
i think i have the best explanation. Think of it this way: there are 3 people. they all chose a different door. which means that one of them chose correctly, the others didn't. so when the host reveals the other wrong door, 2 of the 3 people will benefit from switching. meaning the chance is 2/3. hope this helped
Sir , in question - 6 part b. , the question states How many students are in either English or Math so it should be 14 + 27 = 41 so why did you considered the students in both English and Math ?
