What's up everyone, welcome to our channel. We upload content centring around... well, see for yourself. Please subscribe and let us know if you have any suggestions.
In my opinion Aunt may/ uncle ben 2 Peter pre bite 3.5 mj 5 Eddie 5.5 Mr aziz 5.7 Jameson 6 Norman pre serum 7 Robber 8.5 HARry pre serum 9.5 Flash 15 Mr dickovish 30 Bone saw 50 Human spider 500 Norman /goblin serum 1000 Harry/ Goblin serum 1500 Green Goblin 1700 Spider man 2002 1800 new goblin 1855 Goblin with glider1900 Spider man 2004 1955 Dr octopus 2000 Sandman 2500 Spider man 2007.3000 New goblin/ glider 3,100 Sandman giant 4,500 Venom 5000 Spider man/symbioti 5000
Hela could quite possibly be the most powerful villain as her power can reach infinite level, and her only weakness is the complete destruction of Asgard, something only Odin knew
People here are hating on Key Issues because he speaks the truth and shows actual legit scans and comprehend statements made and their context. Seriously, how does thor with SB have universal attack potency when he was stomped by thanos without the infinity gauntlet?. His speed is MFTL yet he's unable to hit thanos with SB and who's unable to dodge mjonlir or lightning from cap. This guy also, scaled Gorr to universal levels when he was unable to overpower thor and jane while on earth and at the center of the universe. Like gorr was being consistently overpowered by jane Foster who's was new to her thor powers. We also see mjonlir able to shatter and destroy the Necro sword which is supposed to scale to SB and Zeus' thunderbolts or even higher. Thor striking power with SB is universal yet his clash with gorr and Necro sword do little damage to the surrounding environment. The problem is that most people here won't do their own research, won't question this guy's verdict and will just play along because deep down they want this version of thor to scale like his comic counterpart which is absurd. This breakdown has many loops and too many assumptions and even the scans and statements he provides don't align with the actual feats we see in the movies. He ends up making his own judgement upon his perception of what the magnitude of feat is.
Your scaling is poor and questionable for these reasons. 1- you're scaling gorr's strength to Thor claiming he was overpowering him but we see that Thor was also able to toss around gorr and he had to escape and kidnap the children. Remember the two were even unable to wreck a vehicle in their first fight. 2- Jane Foster aka mighty thor is able to go toe to toe with gorr and got some decent hits and knocking him over several times keeping in mind this is a woman with no fighting experience, was momentarily weakened by her spreading cancer, and was new to this thor thing and seem to even perform better than worthy captain america if I'm gonna stick to your scaling (which I'm not). 3- Both mjonlir and SB are able to tank hits and clashes from the Necro sword keeping in mind it's supposed to be superior to mjonlir and maybe equal to SB and Zeus' thunderbolts as it was able to kill numerous gods and even Zeus and the gods in omnipotent city were afraid of gorr because of this weapon which should make it superior to the three weapons but somehow mjonlir of the three was able to shatter and permanently destroy it. Now, gorr got his powers from the necro sword which was destroyed by mjonlir which judging by feats, gorr's strength should be scaling to that of pre awakened thor. His fighting and reaction speed is relative to thor's and Jane's which aren't FTL but rather hypersonic as we've never seen thor reacting to light based attacks consistently. 4- Gorr in the shadow realm was at his peak as he easily overpowered thor and the bifrost. You can't use this feat as his strength feat since it can't be replicated anywhere in the universe other than his realm which makes it irrelevant. It's like using Hela's feats in Asgard and setting it as a standard for her peak power and neglecting that once she's off her homeworld, she'd still be that powerful. 5- The bifrost doesn't create black holes. The singularity created was as a result of the collapse of the bridge, as in the force of it shattering and falling apart.(where do you learn your physics?). 6- When thanos snapped twice(on earth and on The garden), the energy dissipated never reached the levels of a supernova, Black holes or whatever you're stating there. Tony clearly states that the energy that the gauntlet could produce was enough to 'light up' a continent as in destroy it. And when we see thanos snap while in wakanda, Earth wasn't destroyed and heck as rocket us explaining we're seeing the wave of the blast of earth and it never gets destroyed. Also, I the garden where thanos stayed, he states that he actually snapped again to destroy the stones. We don't see any damage to the planet thar he's on after the snap. Rocket might be spewing big words but we never saw anything to support thar statement, so stop making vague assumptions based on statements that lack proof. 7- Stormbreaker isn't a universal level weapon. The blast that came from the infinite gauntlet was similar to a snap?. The snap alone was only able to wipe half the population (not planets, moons or stars) of the universe and you're saying that the blast was more powerful than the snap?. You really went overboard with this one. 8- lightning doesn't travel at light speed as it's electricity. Even if thor's lightning is magical, it doesn't make it faster. 9- Jane Foster never circled the earth twice in the film, where you getting these feats from?. And only SB has the the connection to the bifrost, Valkyrie and Jane don't have connection to the it. 10- Even statements from directors which lack feats to back them up are questionable as Thor doesn't demonstrate any significant increase in his power in Love and Thunder as he's able to go toe to toe with gorr with the exception of the fight in the shadow realm. That statement about Hela being weaker than gorr is a bit questioning as gorr never showed feats to suggest he's more formidable than her. 11- You also misinterpreted statements and phrases and quickly put them as feats without understanding their context. Example is, when Heimdal says Hela would consume the nine realms doesn't mean that Hela was able to destroy the universe at that time. He meant that she would conquer the realms one by one and that's actually why she resurrected the fallen asgardians and ferris. She was unable to even defeat Satur who was at best planetary at his wake. Where do you get the universal feats from?. And just be cause she said the Tessaract was 'not bad' does that mean she scales above it?. She actually credited the eternal flame which she used to resurect asgardians soldiers and ferris who were no match to thor, valkyrie, Hulk and even Skurge who was using bullets. All these individuals were inferior to her and they defeated her army and wolf which were fuelled by the eternal flame which she actually considered superior to the Tessaract. 12- Your scaling has a lot of loopholes, questionable feats and scans you don't even show their sources. It's sketchy and you make alot of assumptions and exaggerating their scaling on bases of what you think are feats.
Hey man, just wanted to say: I loved your content and it bugs me to this day how you disappeared from RU-vid. I hope you're doing well. But if you are ever considering coming back, pls come back bro, youre one of my favorite creators on this platform 🙏 ❤️. Nuff said.
In fact, in the Lego games, for example, it is shown that the other may have some degree of magic, since he manipulates and fires a dark red energy, has psychic powers such as mind control, and telekinesis.
Haha, i was laughing so hard on this video. Thor destroy Sokovia ? Maybe you don;t watch the movie, but it is Tony Stark or Iron Man who heated vibranium core that lifted Sokovia to the sky and created heat shield from that, which only need Thor's lightning hit onto it to trigger chain reaction that can destroy entire city. And the ice in Jotunheim, first, in visualization, the collapse is not even 100 times as big as grand canyon, because Thor's friend can outrun it, and 2nd, it is ice for the sake of lord. Ice means it is brittle and easier to crack. And if you destroy one part of the ice, the crack will travel almost instantaneously until it reached far enough. That's why you don't walk in the ice lake often, cause it can crack and if it is crack while you are on it, you can fall and die. So, no, based on all visualization, Thor's lightning is not even city level nor it is multicontinental level. It is only max several city blocks level or small town level. Because if Thor's lightning is at city or multicontinental level, Thanos army outside the Wakanda's shield will be decimated instantly with his lightning strike. But it is not. So please stop highballing Thor.
Quicksilver was just tired and beateb after fighting in sikovia we literally saw him out of breath thats literally the only reason why quicksilver was shot
heres a question- why didn't thanos just double all the resources in the universe instead of snapping away half of all life- i mean he could of snapped to do anything really
Thor didn't just take the full force of a star...he tanked that shit for several minutes, even on screen it was over a minute... Also the Russo brothers don't really know anything about scaling or comics. They just wanted to make sure you know the Infinity Gauntlet was still the most powerful weapon yet. Sadly Thor didn't really gain any powerups during Love and Thunder.
The biforst speed thing is way off. Its like being in a elevator. She isnt throwing knives faster then the bifrost shes simply throwing them while moving in the bifrosf like a elevator
