The International Centre for Theoretical Sciences (ICTS) of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research was founded in 2007. Its aim is to foster excellence in the basic sciences through its programs, interactions and cross-fertilization between disciplines and be a node for scientific information and values.
First random chaos, resonates into pseudo 3d grid, within that, a spacetime physics... Example: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3_XvRUckzsE.htmlsi=KXdjCvCeMkxfApI1 At a 1minute
"Use Geometric Langlands to deduce the Ramanujan conjecture ..." Is there a stringy analog of the Ramanujan conjecture? How is Geometric Langlands related to string theory? Consider some conjectures: 1. There are 3 fundamental levels of physics: classical field theory, quantum field theory, & string theory, 2. Algebraic geometry is theoretical physics with the removal of time and energy. 3. Theoretical physics is algebraic geometric geometry with the addition of time and energy. 4. String theory is the basis for a unified theory of mathematics & theoretical physics. 5. The main problem with string theory is that the string theorists fail to realize that Milgrom is the Kepler of contemporary cosmology. Is there a Fredkin-Wolfram Langlands that is somehow related to Fredkin-Wolfram string theory? Is there a geometric interpretation of string theory that is based upon paradoxical MOND inertia? Does Einstein's equivalence principle need to be slightly modified because of the physical existence of paradoxical MOND inertia? A little reflection will show that law of the inert and the gravitational mass is equivalent to the assertion that the acceleration imparted to a body by a gravitational field is independent of the nature of the body. For Newton's equation of motion in a gravitational field, written out in full, is (Inert mass) • (Acceleration) = (Intensity of the gravitational field) • (Gravitational mass). It is only when there is numerical equality between the inert and gravitational mass that the acceleration is independent of the nature of the body. - Albert Einstein, The Meaning of Relativity, Princeton University Press Milgrom, Mordehai. "MOND as manifestation of modified inertia." arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.14334 (2023). arxiv.org/abs/2310.14334 Google "mond string theory".
Nice lecture. Thank you for sharing. Question. Have you looked into building a tunable metamaterial for slits and the orbital energy levels for part of the tunable range? Quantum hall or energy orbital levels as a imprinting or band probabilistic pathing and manipulation. Rainbow for extra gradient mapping. Keep up the good work.
Insightful lecture - and to your closing remark about the open problems (including follow up questions from audiences), how about I present our firm’s one CPT(α,Φ) scaling stone answer to solve all these problems with one strike using our Universality meta-proof of Riemann hypothesis (with N=137 as a limit) driven CLQFT within our i-TOE's SM with a 68 MP+ 68 AMP + 1 Higgs structure”, solving all these problems including all CI problems- to see if it might open some collaboration possibilities? And coming back to the point, if I may summarize the gist of our theory - The Wilson loops with chiral symmetry of Dirac fermions gets both created and broken using our “CPT(α,Φ) correlation function caused Higgs mechanism“ with ABJ anomaly and FQH state for both QED and QCD scenarios, using our D operator D1/137(M), whose math is 100% derived from our Universality meta-proof of Riemann hypothesis driven CPT(α,Φ) correlation function, manifesting as our CLQFT within our i-TOE's SM with a 68 MP+ 68 AMP + 1 Higgs structure” in perfect alignment with 5 such high-bars set by Wightman-Osterwalder-Schrader(aka WOS algebraic axioms, the ULTIMATE GOLDEN YARDSTICK) As it turns out, we as a firm had addressed these scaling steps in a recent article titled “Our i-TOE's 5 such Shakespearean play-scaling steps”, in perfect alignment 5 such scaling high-bars set by few such experts of your caliber lnkd.in/geGA3gbq) - and so, how about I present them for your perusal to see if it will exceed your expectations as well -- and open some collaboration possibilities for us to team up on this integrated TOE/SOE/ESG program(lnkd.in/gyx9yRXf) First +++++ Our i-TOE's 5 such Shakespearean play-scaling steps vis-a-vis 5 WOS axiom complaint scaling steps (the GOLD standard of QFT) WOS axiom compliant High-bar 1: 1. It must have an observation or nature based scale-limiting correlation function, capable of limiting the “non Gaussian random field” into a "Gaussian free field with a Haag complaint Hilbert space" and resolve the so-called measurement/scaling problem of both periodic vacuum fluctuations & early inflations by re-scaling it automatically. Our Shakespearean play-scaling Exposition 1: The wave function (aka Hartle-Hawking wave function in steroids) of our CLQFT/TOE has exceeded this high-bar, as we've used nature's one such inbuilt “symmetry generating scaling correlation function called CPT(α,Φ) function" limiting the “non Gaussian random field of QVF with a Banach space” into a “Gaussian free field with a Haag complaint Hilbert space”. More specifically, it has been developed by leveraging our UNIVERSALITY META-SCALING-PROOF of Riemann Hypothesis, in such a way to scale/rescale the periodicity of both fluctuations and inflations(aka fluctuations in steroids) by expositioning/birthing their equivalent symmetrical dipoles(manifesting as Higgs + 68 particle+ 68 anti-particle symmetrical particle pairs, as modeled further by 2 spinors of Dirac eqn). For example, this idea of modeling these symmetries using 2 spinors in the complex plane is what gives rise to symplectic hodge geometry lattices dynamically in 3 and 4 dimensional classical hyperbolic cylinders of the projected plane. WOS axiom compliant High-bar 2: It must be able to discretize spacetime by renormalizing the RG flow with an action formula with a time-like holographic interpretation. Our Shakespearean play-scaling Rising Action 2. Again, our wave function of our CLQFT/TOE has exceeded this high-bar, as we've used the very same CPT(α,Φ) function as the “symmetry breaking CPT(α,Φ) function scaler”, by limiting the ∞-raised pole of Riemann sphere to a compact P-region, while simultaneously renormalizing the ∞ values of e with α, so that its position can be rotated as e^i137nπ Spin-Frequency (S-F) matched cycles unitarily. In other words, this S-F matching phenomena is what breaks the symmetry by shifting the center of mass of each particle by their respective “radius scaled α” so that their symmetry can be broken to create both classical mass and motion for every 1 out of 137(n) cycles in time dimension (and yet by preserving the conservation of CPT theorem). WOS axiom compliant High-bar 3: It must have a scaling/rescaling/limiting parameter for periodic action of lattice geometry using a Wilson action or other similar Fourier transformed actions Our Shakespearean play-scaling Climax 3. Our wave function of our CLQFT/TOE has exceeded this high- bar as well, as we've used a similar Fourier transformed CPT(α,Φ) function scaler, to sustain the action with an “α fine-tuned e and π driven action”(thanks to our additional framing of α as HV/Maxwell daemon/AoC), so that the coefficients & roots of their equivalent algebraic modular forming L-functions can model the periodicity of their GR-Eigen-valued actions via 10+ meta dualities. WOS axiom compliant High-bar 4: It must have a measurement algorithm by modeling the curvature of spacetime in proportion to both fluctuations & inflations in such a way that gauge-gravity can emerge from it Our Shakespearean play-scaling Falling Action 4. Our wave function of our LQFT/TOE has exceeded this high-bar using its “Dice-rolling CPT(α,Φ) function scaler”, by slicing/squeezing the infinite slices (ψ ~ e^- δN) of quantum sphere in the form of one or four ellipsoid slices (as per the Descartes kissing circle geometry and α=r/R logic) into an exact radiused symplectic/asymmetric taurusized hodge geometrical dynamic lattices of classical hyperbolic cylinder of the projected plane(aka Hilbert’s countable infinity hotel as per Banach-Tarski & Russell's paradox) so that they can orbit smoothly like the frames of Muybridge’s Horse in Motion with a curvature proportional to both fluctuations & inflations. This is where we have also additionally hypothesized/predicted that this gravitational motion can be modeled both by semi classical Einstein field equations and/or by our Hodge conjecture meta proof logic. (Note : For example, a pragmatic implication of our RH meta proof of Hodge conjecture is that the 3+ spherical body problem can be solved as 1 equiv. spherical body as follows : Inertia of r= αR gaped eccentric foci Riemann-Poincare Sphere(s=1) = Σ inertia of Riemann zeroed hodge algebraic cycles (S=1/2+ti). WOS axiom compliant High-bar 5: It must have an inbuilt statistical QM measurement system (for various scales) whose Hilbert space must satisfy Haag theorem and be able to model string-gauge geometric dualities as per the static patch holographic principle, so that we can extrapolate/interpolate/interpret the measures accordingly. Our Shakespearean play-scaling Resolution 5 : Our wave function of our CLQFT/TOE again has exceeded this high-bar, as we've used the very same “classical reality generating CPT(α,Φ) function scaler, whose Hilbert space is not only Haag complaint but also resolves the string-gauge dualities of the static patch holographic principle by projecting the Riemannian sphere as a Lie-grouped classical sphere with 10+ meta dualities as visually depicted in the attached exhibit. This precisely why, we have also scaled 5 AITGE origins of our TOE (i.e. RH sourced the Action generator of the Lie group as Action, Inertia, Time. Gravity and Entropy) with these 5 ingredients of CPT(α,Φ) function scaler in such a way to provide a proof for Yang-Mills theory including all Clay Institute problems (plus few more as well) as summarized in this link (facebook.com/share/p/Zguj8kNN47QyzJih/) and below
.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣2(КОММЕНТАРИЙ) ПЕРВАЯ ЧАСТИЦА ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ СЧЁТА ПРОСТРАНСТВА НАЛОЖЕНИЯ - БЫЛ И ОСТАЁТСЯ КОДОВЫЙ НЕЙТРОН💀💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥ЯДЕРНЫЙ СЧЁТ ПРОСТРАНСТВА МАТЕРИИ - ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТСЯ КОДОВЫМ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЕМ СЧЁТА ЭП,ПО ФУНДАМЕНТАЛЬНОМУ/ЯДЕРНОМУ ЗАКРЫТИЮ ЭП ВОЗВРАТА💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥Т.Е.ГОВОРЯ ПРОСТО,СЕЙЧАС ВАМ Я ОЗВУЧИЛ КОДОВЫЙ/ЯДЕРНЫЙ СИНТЕЗ МАТЕРИИ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ СЧЕТА!.Т.К.ЧЕМ БОЛЬШЕ СИСТЕМ/ВВОДА,ПО DARK CODE#💀⚡🔥СЧЁТУ ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ ЭП - ТЕМ СВЯЗАННЕЙ/ПОЛНОЦЕПОЧНЫЙ/ВОЗВРАТНЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ЯДЕРНОГО/КОДОВОГО СИНТЕЗА ЭП ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВА СЧЁТА!.НЕ БЫЛО НИЧЕГО - КОДОВЫЙ НЕЙТРОН БЫЛ💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥С ОЗВУЧЕННЫМ/ЯДЕРНЫМ/КОДОВЫМ ПРОЦЕССОМ РАСЩЕПЛЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ ПРОСТРАНСТВА ЭП,ОПРЕДЕЛЁН ВЕСЬ ПРОЦЕСС КОДОВОГО КОСМОСА МАТЕРИИ ЭП,ИБО ЯДЕРНОЕ РАСЩЕПЛЕНИЕ СЧЁТА МАТЕРИИ ЭП АТОМНОГО КОМПЛЕКСА,ОПРЕДЕЛЕНО ВСЕМ,ВСЕМ ПРОЦЕССОМ ЯДЕРНОГО СИНТЕЗА ЭП/ЗАКРЫТИЯ СИСТЕМ СЧЁТА!.ЭТО - ТЯЖЕЛЫЙ/ЯДЕРНЫЙ/КОДОВЫЙ ПРОЦЕСС ВВОДА ЭП/ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ НОСИТЕЛЯ,ГДЕ 150.000.000°.....И - 270°,СОЧЕТАЮТСЯ В СИСТЕМУ ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП/СЧЁТА СИСТЕМ МАТЕРИИ💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡
.#zZz#.⚡⬆️⬇️💀☢☣1(КОММЕНТАРИЙ)СВЕХТЯЖЁЛЫЕ/КОДОВЫЕ АТОМЫ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ МАТЕРИИ - ЭТО АТОМЫ,ГДЕ САМА ЯДЕРНАЯ СТРУКТУРА СЧЁТА ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ЯДЕРНО ЗАКРЫВАЕТСЯ💀 И ЯДЕРНО ПРЕВРАЩАЕТСЯ💀,ПО ВВОДУ/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ ВИМБРАЦ.ВОЛНОВОГО ПЕРЕМЕЩЕНИЯ DARK#СИСТЕМ,ПРОТОННО/НЕЙТРОННОГО КОМПЛЕКСА ЭП СЧЁТА/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.К./💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥Я ПИСАЛ ОБ ЭТОМ НЕОДНОКРАТНО!.Т.Е.САМ ЯДЕРНЫЙ СЧЁТ ПРОСТРАНСТВА ЭП/МАТЕРИИ КОДОВОГО КОСМОСА,ОПРЕДЕЛЯЕТ СИСТЕМУ/ВВОДА И ВСЕХ ЯДЕРНЫХ СИСТЕМ ПОТЕНЦИАЛА АТОМНОГО КОМПЛЕКСА,ПО ЗАКРЫТИЮ ЭП/ДЕЛЕНИЯ,ОСТАВАЯСЬ В /КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ ВВОДА СИСТЕМ!.ЯДЕРНОЕ/ЛАЗЕРНОЕ/КОДОВОЕ ИЗЛУЧЕНИЕ УРАНОВОЙ ГРУППЫ,ВНЕ ЗАВИСИМОСТИ - U/Pu/Cm/Cf/Lr/Lv#💀⚡🔥......STRONG MAGNETIC FORCE CODE MATTER#💀⚡🔥 - ВВОДИТ СИСТЕМУ ЯДЕРНОГО ЗАКРЫТИЯ ЭП,СТРОГО ПЕРЕМЕЩАЯ КОДОВОЕ/ГРАВИТАЦИОННОЕ ЭП ДЕЛЕНИЯ СИСТЕМ СЧЁТА ЯДРА/СВЯЗИ,ВВОДЯ СИСТЕМУ ЯДЕРНОГО РАЗРЫВА И ЯДЕРНОГО НАБОРА/КС/ПЕРВИЧНОСТИ,ПРОТОННО/НЕЙТРОННОГО ВВОДА,ПО/К.Ц.П.ЭП.Д.М.К./💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥ЯДЕРНАЯ СИЛА ЭП/ИЗЛУЧЕНИЯ ВВОДА - ЗАПРЕДЕЛЬНА💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥НЕОДНОКРАТНО ИЗЛУЧАЛ ЯДЕРНЫЙ МЕХАНИЗМ ПОТЕНЦИАЛА ЭП!.КРИТИЧЕСКАЯ ГРАНИЦА И ЗА....КРИТИЧЕСКОЙ ГРАНИЦЕЙ💀💀💀💀💀⚡🔥🔥🔥🔥⚫⚫⚫⚫💀💀💀💀💀💀⚡⚡⚡
The lecture is quit well. the problem is that I could not here the participant comments, questions, etc. we missed the conversation. Please do the needful for forthcoming lectures.!!
This Article is a 1 1/2 years old, and not talking about Methane, Corporate media still in the pockets of Fossil Fuels. With all the factual evidence updates, we are past the Tipping Point, Decreasing Carbon is a Joke This is called, Death by the Wealth, We are living in a Coal Mine Exciton. Who could care less on environment They over price Oil, and Bioproducts that cause Cancer and cheat the people out of money and health
If you are going to teach units, you should prepare them for a lifetime. Do not teach them how to use units as they are used now. Teach then how to look for and document units. And to prefer sources and groups who use units well. A paper or equations without units is laziness on the part of ill-trained workers, authors, editors, groups. No matter their discipline, no matter their pay-grade. On the Internet there are many units, and worse there are units and methods in most human languages. Your common way of introducing and memorizing units in your country and culture is part of the baggage all children and adults have to carry. If you and others all teach units casually, with "we will get to it one day" attitude, that is embedded in your whole society, economy, industries, methods, books, papers, videos, classes, words, stories and cases. For the Internet Foundation, I changed "Systeme Internationale" to "Standard Internet" and, there, all quantities must have units. The Internet browser, servers, sites, systems, apps and software -- ALL must handle that for the humans - and the new AIs who are much less capable of reasoning than new humans. There are some really wonderful new industries and technologies that are crippled because the groups and people involved at illiterate regarding units, comparisons, standards. If you see "standards groups" not sharing their "standards" or units and measurement methods - they are trying to control by hoarding and controlling the most basic tools for doing science technology engineering mathematics computing finance accounting and quantitative fields. If you see papers and groups forcing "dimensionless" methods on others, they are doing it strictly for control, pride and laziness. The proper way for those situations is to, where used, each symbol or variable or words or value must immediately give the denominator, the reference value. If there is some speed of light nonsense, put it there and have the computer give the proper methods - so ALL can see, without having to memorize it, or having to find it and sort it out. The time wasted in all human society because groups who used to know each other and "everyone is trained the same and memorized the same stuff" ==> no longer works, in a world with 8.1 Billion humans, of which 5.4 Billion are using the Internet in hundreds of human languages and tens of thousands of domain specific languages for professions and clusters of workers. Those vaunted "AIs" are horrible with units. In fact none of them can actually add, subtract, multiply and divide properly. Most of that is because they scabbed the free information from the internet, which is full of ads, self promoting groups, mistakes and guesses. Most of the abbreviations for units are wrong, or too short and ambiguous. Those kinds of AIs are not dedicated and smart enough to resolve that. And humans should not be required to resolve from scratch when once and for all humans and groups - the rules, values and methods can be stored in computer memories and applied consistently for all. Things that took humans centuries to sort out and refine, cannot be discovered by a few bad examples on the Internet, especially there are NO guides or rule for posting knowledge on the Internet. Filed as (Units and Dimensions must be enforced, or the world, including whole countries , will likely fall apart) Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
