Welcome to my channel! I review mainly RC related products and gadgets that I find useful. Feel free to reach out to me via the following links bellow.
I am a new fpv pilot. Learning on a geprc darkstar20.. riding that struggle bus but i am pretty much getting it now.. beat it up pretty well. . Looking for a replacement.. would you say this is too powerful for someone new to the hobby?
I tried using these, thinking they are good replacements of stock antennas. Working with 03 unit probably true. But last night I tried with my 2.5" which has caddx polar , with truerc LHCP antenna. What I found was that the FC started up showing 50mbps but then immediately dropped too 7mbps. ???? I tried a different LHCP antenna at home, still the same problem. Soi replaced beck too original stock antennas on the goggles, and then the caddx stayed at the started 50mbps after startup. What's yours opinion on this? I later found out that the osprey are linear polarized antennas. However, what I find strange is that the original stock antennas are I assume linear and yet those work fine with caddx polar ??? Look forward to people's comments.
Hi Gal, Great video and review of the Speedybee bee25. I don't see a reason why I can't use my walksnail system, Thanks for the video and info on these quad.
I uploaded what I have to google drive: drive.google.com/file/d/1Q41H_YDtW9UjcXgzBEJZbY9RMxhl10FS/view?usp=sharing Hopefully the official GyroFlow profiles will be available soon.
@@KremerFPV Thank you very much. I will test yours. I tried the Thumb Pro 4k profile and it seems to be working. I guess you also tried too. Yours will be better I think.
I wonder how the Nomad compares to the Ranger and Bandit if the receivers used are just regular (without diversity and gemini) 2.4 and 900 respectively. I believe it will not perform as well since the TX antennas are specifically made for one band and not dual band like the Nomad's, but it'll be interesting to know how small or big the difference in performance will be.
Boils down to PRICE PRICE PRICE so basically a Thumb 2 is close to a hundred bucks and the 360 cams are closer to THREE hundred bucks, that for most is the Difference in purchase decisions in todays economy
@@KremerFPV Any chance of getting a shout uncompressed video download? It's really dificult to see the quality unless it's a compairison. I don't want to think how many times I've watched your videos! : )
Frankly speaking, both are ugly. Better to buy a second-market Gopro6 for 80-100 bucks and make a naked gopro. It will be 26 grams but it's an another pro level. Runcam thumb have to be not more than 50 bucks for this image quality. It's also not reliable at all, often dies without a cause.
@@MrPashee why? They look nice. What’s wrong with them? Both look descent enough and as good as GoPro if not better + they are sleeker and smaller form factor. GO2 is really a great camera along with the app works great. Also the runcam thumb series is just amazing.
So far the car is working great (My kids are playing with it sometimes). I understand your concern as I've faced a similar issue with another micro RC car. Maybe the X43 has some compatible parts but I am not sure if they will work or not.
It seems like the Thumb 2 is using a flat profile. Maybe they will update this option in the future but in the meanwhile you can color grade the video if you'd like to.
Runcam seems to have more details because of the 4K resolution, but the hight light control and exploded sky is killing it, the GO2 is doing a much better job on that. The Runcam has flat colours, better for post color grading, the GO2 is already colorgraded by default 😅
hmmm not sure tbh cause you could definitely do color grading on the thumb 2. My eyes arent good enough to have a preference outside of color XD. Great video tho!
Human: Hello radio. Radio: Hello Human: Flap on Radio: motor cut off Human. No Human: hello radio Radio: hello. Human: motor on Radio: flap up left Boomm 😂😂😂😂😂
