I’m Dr. Elliot Schneider and I want to help you learn physics! Whether you’re a beginner just starting out with your physics studies, a more advanced student, or a lifelong learner, I hope you’ll find resources here that enable you to deepen your understanding of the laws of nature.
Sign up for my newsletter and get the notes for my videos: courses.physicswithelliot.com/notes-sign-up
If you find the content I’m creating valuable and would like to help make it possible for me to continue sharing more, please consider supporting me if you’re financially able. You can set up a monthly contribution at Patreon.com/PhysicsWithElliot, or make a one-time contribution at PhysicsWithElliot.com/support-me.
Me: Elliot Schneider PhD, Physics, Harvard University BS, Physics, California Institute of Technology
Thanks for your interesting video. Area under a curve is often equivalent to energy. Buckling of an otherwise flat field shows a very rapid growth of this area to a point. If my model applies, it may show how the universe’s energy naturally developed from the inherent behavior of fields. Your subscribers might want to see this 1:29 minutes video showing under the right conditions, the quantization of a field is easily produced. The ground state energy is induced via Euler’s contain column analysis. Containing the column must come in to play before over buckling, or the effect will not work. The sheet of elastic material “system”response in a quantized manor when force is applied in the perpendicular direction. Bonding at the points of highest probabilities and maximum duration( ie peeks and troughs) of the fields “sheet” produced a stable structure when the undulations are bonded to a flat sheet that is placed above and below the core material. Some say this model is no different than plucking guitar strings. You can not make structures with vibrating guitar strings or harmonic oscillators. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wrBsqiE0vG4.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 At this time in my research, I have been trying to describe the “U” shape formed that is produced before phase change. In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Over-lapping all frequencies together using Fournier Transforms, can produce a “U” shape or square wave form. Wondering if Feynman Path Integrals for all possible wave functions could be applicable here too? If this model has merit, seeing the sawtooth load verse deflection graph produced could give some real insight in what happened during the quantum jumps between energy levels. The mechanical description and white paper that goes with the video can be found on my LinkedIn and RU-vid pages. You can reproduce my results using a sheet of Mylar* ( the clear plastic found in some school essay folders. Seeing it first hand is worth the effort!
NOT German. Her German citizenship was revoked because she was Jewish. She was refused employment by Harvard because they did not allow FEMALE professors. She was hired by the famed Smith college. This is the MOST IMPORTANT THEOREM in all of Mathematical Physics.
Incredible-I have very elementary knowledge in calculus, and yet with some pausing I was able to grasp the general idea of each method thanks to your explanation.
Thank you!!! I was just thinking about this kind of tutorial!! I learned that Uranus was discovered through mathematics before it was located visually and I wondered how. How did the math look? There’s others too. For example, Kepler realized the orbits were elliptical… how? How, by only looking trough a telescope were they able to figure out the precession of Mercury? I was thinking if I had enough money someday I would pay a physics instructor to make a tutorial about those things. This is a step in the right direction. Thanks for this!
It's funny how I just want to know the basic formulas for physics and now I'm learning this 😂. I had a calculus class but we were unfortunately unable to get to the taylor's series because of how hard it got. If our teacher wasn't as kind and nice to us, we will surely be learning this. Anyways thanks for the video!
Bro, just wanted to say keep this up. Clearly I'm not the only person who holds this opinion, but the way you teach by working up from the foundations to build the intuition behind these ideas is great. Speaking as a non-traditional physics enthusiast who is learning this as an adult, the pedagogical approach is wonderful.
ive always loved math. my dad taught me to love math as a chore but he didnt expect me to internalize it, for some reason. i asked him why, he said that "it'll be useful for understanding higher physics when you prep for difficult exams concerning physics and maths". i never understood his logic until now. i feel like i can love physics the same way i do maths, for the first time. im grateful for this channel. thank you. such an incredible little gem. and thanks dad. you know next to nothing about science but simultaneously know everything. because true science is just writing stuff down for later, not knowing what it truly means.
The position and momentum can be determined simultaneously Attosecond spectroscopy debunked the Heisenberg uncertainty principle It was used to observe the motion of the electron applying electrodynamics and attosecond spectroscopy
The magnetic force is the issue; it is a type of relative force, unlike the electrostatic force. Stop the motion of the charge and there is no magnetic force.
Fuck this video is so good, very clean animations with good examples of mathematical intuition. Especially for emergence of the macroscopic mechanics from quantum mechanics
Mr. Elliot, if i may make a request, could you please make a video on the indexes (variant/covariant). The only class I took in undergrad that used those were back in 2020, so i didn't learn them as well as i should
The prime requirement of physics is that you should extremely good at mathematics.....even very basic level physics may need you to use extreme mathematics 😂😂😂........and higher physics is out of the scope of the present available mathematics 😂😂😂
I think that Newton had the idea that gravity bends light through a simple thought experiment: Bob, standing next to a wall of a free falling elevator shoots particles of lights towards the opposite wall. While Bob determines that the particles moved in a straight line, Alice on the ground, does not see the same. Instead, she sees the particles moving on a curved trajectory! Therefore, they conclude that light moves on straight lines on frames free from the action of forces, but not when moving in a gravitational field. Therefore, gravity should bend light! Furthermore,they conclude that the greater the gravity, the more curved will be the trajectory.
