i see why the pilot failed, the issue is with the characters. they are seen as annoyed in some scenes. if they interact with Wayne then it would be funny. i know it would make sense if these are tweaked. but you know if you do it differently and in your style then the pilot would pass.
Most good comedians are influenced by other good comedians that came before them. And many modern day comedians were influenced by the great comedians of the past.
I hope that you enjoyed, The Adventures of the Great Neblinski, book 1, by JRR Tokin. I sent it to you a while back. You deserve a good laugh, and a break from all of this political ugliness. That book is about pot-smoking Gnomes, btw.
I feel like the writers of Back to The Future Part 2 were on to something with that Biff character. I've been watching the Good Liars' coverage on the various rallies. Mind-blowing.
I've experienced audio hallucinations from the mentioned potential causes but not like your case. Oscillating fans sometimes tone out a melody loop, while A/C units can whisper out a quick word that sounds name-like. When I was young, I had a neighbor who had a ham radio that would pick up on my little AM/FM radio player's antenna. Nowadays with more digital advancements tapping into the electro-magnetic field, sound can sadly perish to strategic tactics. I would try using a portable fan and see if it has some breaking news to broadcast. All the best.
You're welcome. My wildest hypothesis on the topic is one of science fiction. Consider if there was some long-term frequencies added to LSD, or some kind of other chemical coding, which would use the spinal cord as a remote antenna.
I have experienced this as well. So many times I would get annoyed at roommates talking incessantly through the night, but sometimes I would realize they weren't. But then who was talking? It only ever happened when the a/c was running. I kind of blocked it out but what you describe is very familiar to me. Auditory pareidolia makes sense to me. It's the most comforting explanation anyway.
i really don't get where he is taking the argument at roughly 1:40:00 from. i almost never encountered queer folk who think this way, usually, instability of sexuality and gender are almost a self evident thing and often times they also are in favour of gender and sex abolition
Not all. My point was somewhat tongue in cheek. Slavoj Zizek might be a lacanian or Freudian or Marxist or post modernist or whatever but for me above all he is a contrarian. He enjoys the intellectual game of dialectics and the beauty of his positions are that he can’t really be held to them. His thinking is always evolving. He is not rigid. That can be both frustrating and liberating.
@@LarryCharlesProjects I see what you mean now. I took your statement too literally. Tho I only recently started reading Hegel, I'm pretty sure this is a very Hegelian thing to always evolve in thinking. Reminds me a bit of the metaphor he uses at the start of the phenomenology where the plant evolves from a bud into it's seeming opposite but at the end they are both parts of one whole and the bud was also necessary for the flower to come into existence in the first place. I'm pretty sure Hegel will use that as an analogy to consciousness and spirit as well as dialectics but like I said I only recently started Hegel so this is pure speculation. To get back to the point, your statement reminds me of that in the sense that thought itself may have to go through stages of being wrong as a precondition towards a better opinion (using "right" and "wrong" here is rather imprecise and not really fitting but I think you get what I mean)
As per usual, Zizek' is wrong. There's some people who really are heroic in their person. It's not simply an example, but an illustration of a detail, in "Night" it's mentioned that a particular rabbi was always smiling in the camp when others were freezing starving and in misery and he himself -- and that nobody resented ot disliked him doing so.
There's a conspiracy theory that the first Zizek was killed. This is the second Laurel Canyon Zizek. You can tell because this one is more slender by a bit and more animated.
I've long considered John Waters to be a wonderful personality. I'm a diehard conservative and Trump supporter. So not everyone that enjoys many aspects of John Waters' life and career is a leftist.
Diehard might be a bad thing for any gov. Always use discretion, no matter who you choose. They are here to serve us, not the other way around...China loves to tell people to "Make" their country so and so, and also threatens families if citizens don't comply.
John Waters is one of the most charming men alive and you keep interrupting him and cutting him off. Let him shine! This interviewer is giving a masterclass in conversational narcissism. You sound like an aggressive, insecure, know it all. Talk less.
This is one of the best Zizek interviews I have seen, and frankly this has a lot to do with how the interviewer "handled" Zizek. It was a very informal/friendly and yet assertive approach which visibly made him very comfortable
