I tried end myopia but with my computer desk job it was becoming tougher and tougher for me , so I just opted for smile eye surgery , my prescription was -7 diopters in both eyes with cylinder -2.5 in both eyes . My eyes are 20/20 now and I don't have to wear glasses anymore. Getting rid of glasses was a life changing decision for me. Also I am suffering from no sideffects , no eye dryness nothing whatsoever . The only side effect (I won't even call it a sideffect its not big of worry) is that sometimes at night time I see a Lil bit of star bursts but that goes away after blinking 2-3 times . I wish I could've done it with endmyopia but endmyopia was not effective for me .
I was wearing -7 diopters with prisms. I was given an incorrect prescription and kept going to specialists who told me my vision was perfect. It took 7 so called professionals to listen to me and find the error which had pulled my eye inward causing double vision. I could not afford the high price to replace these glassed but I had some reading glasses that were -5 with no prisms so I wore them full time. In a short time I was seeing very clearly with them. I have now reduced another diopter and a quarter. So I have gone from -7 with prisms to -3.75 with no prisms and weaker ones for computer. I go without when possible. My eyes continue to improve. It takes a bit of time but it does work.
I agree with not wearing minus lenses at all. I'm not sure about wearing lower diopter glasses because you're still producing a phenomenon which I call "convergence" where the eyes are tricked into thinking objects are much closer than they actually are. I like the idea of being in natural light which I've been able to do for the last five years. I prefer the USNA method of using plus or reading glasses to do near work and even midrange work, say like 50 cm to 100 cm away; anything less is near work (<50 cm). Genetics has nothing to do with getting nearsighted; it's all close work exacerbated by using minus lenses! Good luck
Are you sure about genetics having no effect? My dad is indoors at almost all times and spends 10+ hours a day staring at a computer screen (it's his job), doesn't wear glasses and has almost perfect vision. My mom spends way less time in front of screens and other closework and spends a lot of time outside and doesn't wear glasses but she is very nearsighted.
@@legoentertainment8750 There are genetic markers that determine how susceptible one is to eye strain. But all human eyes (even primate eyes in fact) work the same.
durna boba pieno produktus ismaino i nuodus - mesa, zuvi ir visokius pelynus bei dar mazina isgerto vandens kieki (visiska besmegene, nes vanduo butent palengvina inkstu darba, o ne atvirksciai)
For most of my life I have been wearing weaker glasses than what I should have according to what was measured. And it had no effect on it getting worse, it was still getting worse. As a child I was trying to be without glasses as much as possible, then later when it was too bad to be without them I was wearing weaker than what was measured for my condition, and still the myopia kept getting worse for years. :/
@hardstyle905That doesn't explain that many people do that nowadays and don't have such a bad eyesight; my worsening of eyesight was happening already before smartphones existed anyway. In my childhood and adolescence.
@@kursaikursai2968 mokslininkas ir tiesiog protingas zmogus, beje i vegetaryste mane dar esanti 16 metu pastumejo butent Ksavera, nes ta vasara isgirdau jos pokalbi per radija apie vegetarizma, o ji veliau pradejo mesa esti ir durnystes kresti
