Can the Clerk be E-mailed? The cops stole my Automobile infringed my right to travel cuz of not having insurance & I'm homeless. It was the only valuable thing I had left leaving me with 8 Tickets. Court date is this Wednesday.
Before I go down the road of filing any discovery motion, for traffic tickets issued in the State of California, I will always first request a TRIAL BY DECLARATION by mailing to the Clerk of the Court a check for the full amount of the bail, and a completed REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY DECLARATION (from TR-205) with ONLY the following words appearing in the STATEMENT OF FACTS section of the TR-205: "I am not guilty of the offense cited in the traffic ticket. I am innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In order to convict me of the alleged offense, evidence of my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt must be presented to the court. If such evidence is not submitted by the due date, or if the evidence that is submitted does not establish my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then I move this court to dismiss the above-entitled case with prejudice." PLEASE NOTE: I am not telling my side of the story, nor am I offering any evidence, rather, I am only proclaiming my innocence and asking for a dismissal. 99% of the time, the cop will not file the required paperwork in reponse to my TR-205 within the statutorily required time period, and the court will have no choice but to dismiss the case and order the Clerk of the Court to refund my bail. In the unlikely event that the cop does file the required response to my TR-205, and I do lose the case, I will simply file a REQUEST FOR NEW TRIAL (TRIAL DE NOVO) by filing form TR-220 with the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the DECISION and NOTICE OF DECISION, in which case the conviction for the TRIAL BY DECLARATION will be vacated, all evidence destroyed, and a brand new trial will be calendered for hearing the case. Once the new trial date has been set, I will then start filing the discovery motions indicated in this video. I have also been successful in having traffic tickets dismissed (after filing a motion to dismiss) due to a lack of a speedy trial, which was caused by delays in receiving discovery, when the Court granted a continuance to the case due to no discovery being provided and subsequently failed to secure my signature on a form waiving my right to a speedy trial.
Before I go down the road of filing any discovery motion, for traffic tickets issued in the State of California, I will always first request a TRIAL BY DECLARATION by mailing to the Clerk of the Court a check for the full amount of the bail, and a completed REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY DECLARATION (from TR-205) with ONLY the following words appearing in the STATEMENT OF FACTS section of the TR-205: "I am not guilty of the offense cited in the traffic ticket. I am innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In order to convict me of the alleged offense, evidence of my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt must be presented to the court. If such evidence is not submitted by the due date, or if the evidence that is submitted does not establish my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then I move this court to dismiss the above-entitled case with prejudice." PLEASE NOTE: I am not telling my side of the story, nor am I offering any evidence, rather, I am only proclaiming my innocence and asking for a dismissal. 99% of the time, the cop will not file the required paperwork in reponse to my TR-205 within the statutorily required time period, and the court will have no choice but to dismiss the case and order the Clerk of the Court to refund my bail. In the unlikely event that the cop does file the required response to my TR-205, and I do lose the case, I will simply file a REQUEST FOR NEW TRIAL (TRIAL DE NOVO) by filing form TR-220 with the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the DECISION and NOTICE OF DECISION, in which case the conviction for the TRIAL BY DECLARATION will be vacated, all evidence destroyed, and a brand new trial will be calendered for hearing the case. Once the new trial date has been set, I will then start filing the discovery motions indicated in this video. I have also been successful in having traffic tickets dismissed (after filing a motion to dismiss) due to a lack of a speedy trial, which was caused by delays in receiving discovery, when the Court granted a continuance to the case due to no discovery being provided and subsequently failed to secure my signature on a form waiving my right to a speedy trial.
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🌏✝️ 14th Amendment. 2016 Due process violation 4th 5th 6th 14th Amendment violation. A Writ of habeas corpus a violation of my constitution rights violated 2019
Statements of council in argument or brief are not sufficient for summary judgment Trensy vs Paglario. Object when the prosecutor speaks because his testimony is hearsay and not admissible
BRO !!! I literally voiced this to my mate re the ankle bracelet situation ... and boom. Exactly what I thought. Some of them have listening devices in them too
This is all BS. I've seen dozens of videos of people trying this "driving vs traveling" arguments with cops at traffic stops and it always ends up with them getting arrested. Usually also their windows bashed in. & then they get reamed out by judges who tell them to stop believing crap they read on the internet.
My older brother was very good at getting public servants fired or suspended . He would also say that you need to use thier own laws or policy against them
Before I go down the road of filing any motions indicated in this video, for traffic tickets issued in the State of California, I will always first request a TRIAL BY DECLARATION by mailing to the Clerk of the Court a check for the full amount of the bail, and a completed REQUEST FOR TRIAL BY DECLARATION (from TR-205) with ONLY the following words appearing in the STATEMENT OF FACTS section of the TR-205: "I am not guilty of the offense cited in the traffic ticket. I am innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In order to convict me of the alleged offense, evidence of my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt must be presented to the court. If such evidence is not submitted by the due date, or if the evidence that is submitted does not establish my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, then I move this court to dismiss the above-entitled case with prejudice." PLEASE NOTE: I am not telling my side of the story, nor am I offering any evidence, rather, I am only proclaiming my innocence and asking for a dismissal. 99% of the time, the cop will not file the required paperwork in reponse to my TR-205 within the statutorily required time period, and the court will have no choice but to dismiss the case and order the Clerk of the Court to refund my bail. In the unlikely event that the cop does file the required response to my TR-205, and I do lose the case, I will simply file a REQUEST FOR NEW TRIAL (TRIAL DE NOVO) by filing form TR-220 with the Clerk of the Court within 20 days of the date of the DECISION and NOTICE OF DECISION, in which case the conviction for the TRIAL BY DECLARATION will be vacated, all evidence destroyed, and a brand new trial will be calendered for hearing the case. Once the new trial date has been set, I will then start filing the discovery motions indicated in this video. I have also been successful in having traffic tickets dismissed (after filing a motion to dismiss) due to a lack of a speedy trial, which was caused by delays in receiving discovery, when the Court granted a continuance to the case due to no discovery being provided and subsequently failed to secure my signature on a form waiving my right to a speedy trial.
Can you give the subpeona to the lawyer of a plaintiff to force one of their own witnesses to appear? This witnesses may have multiple addresses but is married to and related to 2 both of the attackers I'm restraining from
To those of you who have commented about your feelings as they pertain to this man, his religious beliefs and what have you let me just say this. I dont care what your beliefs are regarding God, I dont care if you think this man is shady or if he gives you the creeps, what matters is whether justice was served. I dont know the ends and outs of his case but i do know that if you or me or anybody else ever found ourselves in a situation where our fate rested in the hands of 12 jurors the last thing we would want is for them to make a determination as to our guilt based off how they felt about our looks or the kind of vibe we put off. What are the facts? Who does the burdon of proof fall on? Its not me? It isnt kent. The burdon of proof is supposed to fall on the prosecutor. Your not supposed to prove your innocence, they have the burdon of proving your guilt. All this other nonsense is trash. Oh your not a fan of Kent? You think hes shady? Thats enough for you? You think hes shady and so that makes him losing 8 years of his life some how excusable to you? Again if it was cut and dry and there was more to the case then what was laid out then so be it but if anything that man said was true then we need to wake up, we need to stand in support of one another and start standing against abuses of power. Judges and cops, prosecutors they are not concerned with truth, justice, or anything of the sort.
People drive on the road, go to schools, parks and they seriously don’t understand why they have to pay taxes. Like, do they think roads, school, park just appears from the sky?
Number one hes the most evil disgusting human being Obama and yes he had extremely a lot of spies in the field on the computer hacking Obama and Hillary oh it's just goes way deep it's extremely. Crimes against humauntie and these are laws he put in place and brainwashed. Up I just think it's a new norm got to follow new rules. When you're actually being brainwashed to become a soldier to turn against your own Selves.and other human beings
And they take the address copy it so if anything else happens with a complaint. Then they have your address where you live and. For a police officer in a vehicle moving vehicles 2 vehicles movie. You cannot see the people that's driving so if they did something that was legitimately a reason to pull over that vehicle. They would ask the driver not the passenger because they don't know the passenger
Well it was a police officer that did it in the 1st place. He? Grabbed her breast you know. He did to her to? Have a reaction. To? Turn. Around? Fast. And elbow a car? Take it for what it is
This man is telling the truth it happens to all of us a lot of us but it doesn't go on the news cause the government controls the. Medhappens more than people think that even the government's money but they seize your money even police officers seized your money and you never see it again. To cycle weapons they seize them you'll never see them again. You be lucky if you get to see him before the seven year is up
This is why three view dash cams are essential. That is not something they can just casually take and lose like a phone. Also a recording device that looks like a pen may be overlooked. I would still use my cell phone to record audio as a back up. It might cause them to focus on the phone and ignore the pen.
