Thank you so much for this amazing video! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?
Bro why did he stop posting?!; This video is 6yrs old, but has so much information 😭... If he kept pumping out more cool videos like this he would have had more than a million subs. At least these gems are still on his page. This video alone has really helped me understand this programming language stuff. It's interesting to learm how things like this are even possible. Really helpful for my studies. Im a civil engineering undergraduate btw.
This test proves the Earth does not move. Another test one can do is locate the North Star it will guide one to Bethlehem from the far east. These same folks deny Jesus existence when all the history books concur that he walked this earth died defeated death returned had a 40 day party with his friends then ascended to Heaven sitting at Gods right hand waiting for all to come free of charge. God Bless.
Let's apply to this. When atp is formed (by joing phosphate to adp) energy should be lost to form bond according to one pov while other says it stores energy. How do you explain this?
if a program needs a compiler to be a finished workable product and a compiler is a program how did they make the compiler. It’s kinda like when you buy new scissors and you need scissors to get them out of the package.
Where are you? And why are you not making more videos like this. This is by far the best video i have ever seen. I have problem visualising stuff and because of that its harder to learn stuff. Your video actiually gave me good understanding of how programming actually works. Thanks for this.❤
Wow that perfectly worked. I could identify that my screen was running at 30 instead of 60 Hertz. Now that is running on 60 Hz, I can clearly see the clock hand hitting every single notch.
I would like to refine my understanding of these concepts. If you believe I am mistaken or wish to add some precision, please comment below. In my understanding, the triangle, or "2D" diagram, represents all combinations of lambda * blue + mu *red + eta *green where: - Physically, blue, red, and green are the "pure" lights of each color. By "pure" light, I mean exact light streams of constant wavelengths that people generally perceive as blue, red, and green, respectively. Although this is conventional, to generalize, we could choose "blue," "red," and "green" to be constant streams of light with wavelengths x, y, z respectively, where Planck length <= x, y, z <= radius of the universe. For the strict mathematical representation, we can use these as the basis of a three-dimensional real vector space. For example, blue could be represented as (1,0,0), red as (0,1,0), and green as (0,0,1). Why a real vector space? Mainly because: - Physically, the quantum world is "at most" continuous, but in a measurable way, it is bounded below by the Planck length and above by the radius of the universe. Thus, by choosing a real vector space, we account for the fact that the universe is discrete but may also be continuous. - Given that atoms have size and assuming any phenomenon is physical, there is a finite number of possible neuronal or cone activations. By choosing a real vector space, we can represent all combinations the brain can perceive, as there are too many for the brain to compute. In particular if we assume a cone is either activated or not without any intermediate value then the brain perception is clearly a discrete mathematical model. To be nuanced, I will distinguish between the mathematical representation, physical representation, and brain representation. - The mathematical multiplication lambda *blue, mu *red, eta *green should have a meaning both physically and perceptually. If we fix an observer (which could be a camera where the brain is the processor and the cones are the sensors, or a human, or an average human representing the average capacity of humanity) with say b blue sensors, r red sensors, and g green sensors, then lambda *blue, mu *red, eta *green represents the portion of the blue, red, and green sensors/cones activated by the mixed light stream. For example, 0 *blue means no blue sensors/cones are activated, while r *red means all red sensors are activated. - In this setting, the coefficients lambda, mu, eta are positive real numbers bounded above by b, r, g respectively, hence 0 <= lambda + mu + eta <= b + r + g. This explains why the set of the "colors" are the set of those combination which is the convex envelope of the three-dimensional points blue, red, and green, forming a convex set. - The mathematical linear combination lambda * blue + mu *red + eta *green has the physical meaning of mixing these light streams. If someone could further develop the mixing phenomenon, it would be great! Considering these explanations, the mathematical envelope E = {lambda * blue + mu *red + eta *green | 0 <= lambda <= b, 0 <= mu <= r, 0 <= eta <= g} is much larger than the possible physical combinations, which form a subset of E, say E'. These physical combinations are themselves more numerous than what a camera or brain can perceive, forming another subset E'' of E' (the coefficient are integer in this case). The video explains that "your color receptors are not entirely independent of each other." Indeed, activating green receptors also activates a proportion of the red ones. Mathematically, this means we cannot choose lambda independently of mu and eta. Therefore, the brain cannot see the entire envelope E'', but rather a portion of it, say F c E''. That's it! With this setting, we can easily generalize to an n-dimensional real vector space, for example, for the mantis shrimp: [Mantis shrimp eyes](en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantis_shrimp#Eyes)
I have never seen a video that explains quantum better than this video. I understand you stopped making videos. I hope you come back to this work one day because you really explain it perfectly.
When I started to learn programming my main interest was how does the compiler work? Instinctively I knew that the programmer of the compiler was the actual creator and the "coder" only a kind of better "Typewriter ".
