If you can't prove you are a legal citizen of the US you should probably get your life together before voting on our leadership. Vote Yes if you want to stop election fraud!
As usual they have no idea what they are talking about… there is no reason to not vote no unless you like ambiguous language and want to abuse that ambiguous language
Presentations 3:10 - Analysis of the Proposed Constitutional Amendment by Dan Lenz 19:26 - Effects of the Current Legal Landscape for Noncitizens by Iuscely Flores 28:59 - The Myth of Noncitizen Voting by Jasleen Singh 50:07 - Toolkits & Actions by Molly Carmichael 1:18:37 - Closing Thoughts by Dorothy Skye Questions 41:58 - If this constitutional amendment passes, what may be some of the unintended consequences? 45:38 - Iuscely, can you tell us why you have no chance of ever becoming a citizen? 48:09 - Do you see any parallels between the myth about noncitizen voting and the myth or conspiracy theory of mail-in voting fraud in the 2020 election 1:00:56 - What did the legislature say was the purpose of this amendment? 1:02:29 - What's required for a referrendum to become a constitutional amendment? How does a constitutional amendment get on the ballot? 1:04:20 - Is this amendment going to make our elections more secure? 1:05:16 - Can poll workers explain the amendment to voters or answer questions about it? 1:07:01 - Have any other states passed legislation to provide for documentary proof of citizenship? 1:09:15 - If Wisconsin ever requires documentary proof of citizenship for voting, who will be disproportionately affected? 1:10:35 - Can you give us some information about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) act that congress is trying to pass? 1:11:20 - If this were to pass, would it affect mail-in registration? 1:12:30 - What's the significance of the "Every" to "Only" change in language? 1:14:06 - How will this affect the municipalities that allow noncitizens to vote? 1:16:24 - Couldn't this also disproportionately affect women who change their names? What about people who were born at home and don't have a birth certificate?
Thanks to the LWV for organizing this webinar and to all of the presenters! This was incredibly useful in helping understand why such a seemingly benign amendment has been added to the ballot and the effects that it may have for Wisconsinites, regardless of citizenship status.
I missed the zoom program and was very disappointed. I was so happy when I found this recorded so I could watch on U tube. Thank you so much. I am most likely going to be a disenfranchised voter if the federal or WI law goes into effect. I have a complicated history since childhood and do not posess my birth certificate and my last name was changed in court 8 months later. I have been married more than once. I am elderly. I will have to try to track all this info down and obtain certifiied copies. I cannot currently get a real id because of these things. However, I am able to vote because of my WI DL. I was born here, moved to CA but moved back 50+ years ago. It will also disproportionally affect women as well because they tend to take their husbands last name. The amount of hoops people will be required to go through to be able to vote will increase. Certified copies of things are not free and can be lost. Certain racial and socioeconomic groups who move and lose information, elderly, women will be those impacted most. These all tend to have a higher percentage of democratic voters. The fact this is put on the ballot or even brought up needs to be a red flag for "why do they want this?" since non citizen voting is not even an issue. Yes, laying the groundwork to claim voter fraud in case their side does not win. But also ulterior motives and the pandoras box of voters rights it can errode. The ones most likely NOT to have many problems providing certifications will be middle to higher income (mostly white) men in my opinion. That tells you something.
Vote No on this Amendment. This video by the LWV Wisconsin is very helpful to understand where we are missing the boat on truly moving forward in Wisconsin!
You know not to listen when their title is league of women. 😂 They have never been right and since the vote the left has been able to bring corruption and hate all over the West. Thanks, but no thanks. 😂
Being that Wisconsin is a swing state it means that it is not the national voice of the people that decides who our president will be but rather the amount of dark money that is infused in the media voice of these particular states. When only a handful of swing states have huge amount of dark money effecting the message that the media is delivering to us that loudest voice we are hearing may very possibly not be the voice of the majority of the electorate. That booming voice may very possibly be the moneyed special interest not necessarily interested in benefiting the true common good of the democratic popular majority.
