she must get off so much after the police officer she represented who had a woman hit by a train handcuffed in a police cruiser go free, saying her client has had a difficult time when the person who was literally HIT BY A MOVING TRAIN has to have her whole life change doesn't, her client deserves to not be a police officer anymore and should be in jail along with Mallory Revel
If we're dealing with appellate level or higher: Trust me, unless the judge is Fannie Willis, the judge knows the Latin words because Latin words are the foundation of all scientific and legal taxonomies. Now you can use an obscure word that is not Latin--it's a moot point. But about 85% English academic parlance is Latinate.
In other words, write for a local traffic news blog, not for a classical journal: gone are the days when judges were expected to read Cicero at four, and translate Thucydides by six.
Shite ! Tell Me In A Phone Que To See Doctor ? Suddenly Go From 22 To 38 ? MMMM Does Immigration Have There Own Phone Line ? Are Staff Told To Answer Them First ? Yes ? WHY ? ITS LEGAL REQUIREMENT THATS WHY !!! DONT LISTEN TO GOVERMENT BULLSHIT !!! All Corrupt DISGUSTING !!!!!
The judge may or may not research a point you feel has relevance? This is the kind of behavior that’s caused your current public perception, which is not positive anywhere but the restaurant or bar where you congregate with your peers. And you have a very exclusive club. When I hear about someone seeking vengeance on the legal system, I Never automatically assume they don’t have cause. The norm, of course, is that they’re just unhappy with the decision. But make no mistake. Every bad judge reflects on the rest of you, possibly more directly than any other profession. We know that no one is better positioned to know of bad judges than other judges. Because you hold ultimate power, your responsibility is greater. Speak up.
Thanks for sharing your valuable knowledge and professional opinion. The tips you gave coincide with the many legal writing books I read over the years. Thanks again!
Accurate, Practical and easy to understand. I've benefitted from this a lot and I'm glad non-lawyers have also found this helpful. Thanks for taking your time to share these tips your Honor
1 final question for you sir. Why must a man belong to a private member association to talk and represent people in court. The law can not be licensed to any man or group...but yet the private member association of the bar is the only way a man can represent anyone or be a judge. Why cannot any man run for judge without belonging to a single exclusive private club and has a absolute strangle hold on 1 branch of government. How say you.
The bed rock of law has it original fountain in authority in God. He is the only creator of life and law and marriage 💑 As creator he holds all Rites/Rights and authority over such. Anything repugnant to such is null and void on its face. Supreme Court decisions by extrapolation... No state can convert a right into a privilege and issue a license or permit and collect a fee tax or other for any God given rights...Shuttleworth vs. Birmingham 1960s Mulberry vs. Maddison And many other case decisions. Anything repugnant to our sacred Covenant Constitution between us the Masters and our field hands aka public servants is null and void. The Constitution is measly the recognition that these God given rights are gathered and backed up .. The bill of rights is a Restraing order against our servants. We are able to examine a witness and cross examine the witness in trail but yet the DA is the accuser on behalf of millions of people...but you can ask people in court in the gallery if the DA speaks on their behalf and they will normally say no...so when you can not examine and cross examine the accuser how can you get a fair trail ever ??? How can a peace officer serve all 4 positions in traffic and or other criminal acts, conduct and behavior.. I.E. and to wit: see the alleged crime as witness and complaint and serve process by notice to appear or arrest?? I've served and retired law enforcement of 44 years as a Chief of Police, 2 times Chief Deputy Constable and Medical retired due to a line of duty injury Worked in 5 states and as a Deputy US Marshall.. I have asked legal scholas and active and retired judges from local to federal and no 1 can answer the questions. Or they say well it is not legal at all. But we just do it anyways. I am amazed to say the least. The government as a whole and the judicial branch has has left the tracks and has departed the reservation. 1 maxim of law says where the law is unclear there is no law at all. That sounds like a ton of exciting laws to me. Because when the judge in a court of law and record has to ask attorneys about the law and ask other attorneys etc. The law is unclear and no law exists at all. No equality in law at all either. The man who has a public defender has next to no effective repensentation while the wealthy man can afford many experts, and private investigators and several attorneys at 1 time....no way that is justice. Public Defenders always without fail come to the jail with a plea bargain and will not do anything else and the excuse is we don't have funds for this defense and that's no good. I have seen over and over again and again 2 or 3 men be accused of the same crime and the ones with public defenders went to prison and the man that could afford justice...I mean a private attorney went home like nothing ever happened...and they were all together and all were involved in the act. How say you judge ...I am not trying to get you or trap you at all..explain all this to us.here. Chief Jones Retired 43 years of public safety service
Soooooooo proud of my big sister ❤ 💙 💓 💕. She makes us so proud and this interview brings tears to my eyes. She always has been my motivation 💪🏾. Love you Sis ~Niecy
summary: 1. Don't tell Court what to do but ask sincerely what you would like Court to do. 2. Fact based: no adjective and no adverb, no disparaging 3. Concise, clear and simple sentence - Don't repeat 4. Be helpful: reference something useful/relevant to Court 5. Avoid Latin phrases 6. Focus on your best issues 7. Good organization and roadmap 8. Be accurate 9. No personal attack 10. One citation of influential authority rather than two unless necessary
Thank you so much for taking the time to make this video. Though not directed to the public, I am benefiting from this too. I am , I learned, correctly said, ‘ignorant of the law.’ I add, ignorant of the legal system, process and, LANGUAGE.