Al Ghazali is historically credited with the single-handed interruption of the scientific progress that the Muslims had been making at the peak of their power. Having absorbed the knowledge transferred from the Greek and Indian civilizations they began to produce their own, becoming in the 9th and 10th centuries the most accomplished astronomers and scientists the world had ever seen. Reverting to God as the cause of everything meant the persecution of scientists who looked for truths that God "had already dictated" was Al Ghazali's neat endeavour. No need for them. This allowed the West, from the 12th century onwards, to assimilate and own all that knowledge sending the Muslim world back to obscurantism of religious explanations. How many Nobel Prizes in Science within the Muslim World? Half of one, an American educated Muslim who shared the prize with another American academic. How many have the Jews won? A quarter of them all. Why? because the Jews are the most atheist nation in the world.
ru-vid.comsBDnlxGmuaw?si=sBBt3hEnZi2i9EBR 1HR 11MINUTES OF THE ABOVE LINK, IBNU TAIMIYYAH WAS CORRECT SPEECH OF GOD WAS THE SOUNDS.. HE IS TOUCHING ON THE TOPICS OF THE 100TH NAMES.. BUT I DOES NOT KNOW IF HE MENTIONED THE 5 SOUNDS. THE SELECTED SOUNDS
The problem for Al Ghazali, as with all theologians and metaphysic philosophers, is, of course, the utter lack of evidence for their claims. Philosophical speculations are nothing more than that. Science, on the other hand, means progress, a path away from ignorance. Which is why, dear Sir, when you are ill you don't rely on your prayers to your god, but on the knowledge of medical practitioners.
Neil deGrasse Tyson is a clown he is no scientist he claim to be scientist yet where is his accomplishments? he just a guy with above average knowledge who know how to talk to audience
Lost me with 10 seconds. Rene Descartes never said "I think, therefore I am." That is a common mistranslation that fundamentally simplifies what he actually said.
This video is bad. The pictures flash so fast it is confusing and disorienting. You present some intriguing quotes but they are very hard to understand in such limited context. This video is really just clickbait.
Actually if you go further back he stole his ideas from the zorastrians. Just like mathematics was stolen from the zorastrians and Islam takes credit for it lol
Why is everyone arguing on where Ibn Sina was born and where he comes from, Muslims are powerful when united as one not separated by nationalism that was created by western colonizers. This is a major issue that's growing among muslims today where everyone is trying to have pride in their nation rather than being Muslim, i think that is where Ibn sina comes from doesn't matter, what matters is that he is a muslim brother and this to me is what brings me pride
In case some ignorant muslims are not aware: western kafir (disbelieving ) philosophers, who will be thrown in Hell unless they repent and convert to islam, are so amazed by this person, they love him, appreciate his research and so on. Isn’t it a bad sign? When did recognition coming from a disbelievers become a sign of a person being a muslim scholar?
The dilemma is Farabi’s virtuous cities do not exist in this world. They may exist in speech, but not in our world. There are however examples of virtuous individuals. They tend not to last long in this world though. And why is that?
Al Ghazali has never identified as a persian phylosopher and has never been identified as such. Al ghazali was known as a Muslim phylosopher he has an arabic name and spoke and wrote in Arabic and wen to arabic schools and there is no prove he is persian besides that he was born in a city that is part of Iran in modern days. Which doesn'r imply he is persian. Replacing this identity with a persian one is another act of distortion committed by the west in an attempt to shadow anything Islamic and Arabic.
His reasoning is so poor, I doubt he was the bane of anybody. Nevertheless it's nice to know, but I was hoping for something more substantial on the first two questions.
can you please make an arabic translation on this or at least use some easy words but still the videos are awesome and have a lot of useful information ❤
Public Influencers who spread lies about Historic Icons & Polymath Giants, should be abandoned, then confronted and demanded to correct themselves publicly.
He is completely Iranian and belongs to an Iranian country, but the reason he was born in Afshanah or Balkh is that at that time there were no countries with these names and these countries were considered part of the Iranian Empire. Please don't steal our culture, America and Israel have commissioned countries close to Iran to steal Iran's culture by falsifying its history, for example, Azerbaijan is trying to name our polo sport, which is for us, in its own name, and our Shirazi salad is a terrorist gang of Israel and Or Avicenna our Spain and Maulavi our Turkey, India and Afghanistan. Please research first and be alert. You are also considered to be part of the historical scope of Iranian culture, not Russian culture or English culture. Be careful not to be deceived.
Philosophy is cool but often it seems like people get too confident in their estimation of what the brain can do. We are informed by our everyday perception, which is fundamentally limited. You might conclude that time is constant for everyone, but it's not, it's actually relative. This is a radical change which would never have arrived from philosophy. Or at least, I don't think so. The fact is we know very little about how the world actually works and we should recognize when what we're saying is pure conjecture on potentially flawed grounds. For instance, the issue of God's essence changing if He knows about particulars which themselves change over time. The resolution Ghazzali suggested was to let God's knowledge change with time, as long as His essence remains unchanged. But what if that's a fundamentally incorrect way of looking at it? What if all of time exists all laid out at once? What if instead of a constantly evolving 3d universe moving along a 4th dimension of time, the entire 4D structure is all laid out, like a movie tape, with the illusion of dynamism experienced by us simply because we're the characters in the movie? In this case, God's knowledge need not by dynamically changing "in time". He could just be aware of the entire movie all at once, comprehending past, present and future in one go. Evidently, the philosophers did not think of this. Why not? Because they were just using their brains and their senses. And those are very limited and limiting things when it comes to trying to understand how the world works on a deep level, and making big claims about God or other important matters. It would not occur to them that all of time might already exist, since it doesn't feel that way to us, as the characters in the movie. In short, I think we should be very careful or even skeptical of philosophy once its conclusions become unverifiable. In recent history physics has made great strides and we can actually start to criticize some philosophical ideas using concepts that come from physics, like I just did thinking about time as a 4th dimension of a 4D universe, rather than the direction along which a 3D universe moves. So far, the physics might just be showing that the philosophy is bull. So... be careful with the rest of it, which might also be unreliable. Empirical and verifiable science is more reliable than just using your brain and senses, which is unsurprising. Just goes to show, using pure reason from limited information leads you to flawed thinking, no matter how bright the mind is that does the reasoning. What it really is, is unfounded faith. Unproven and unreliable assumptions which should not be followed. As for matters of faith, leave it to faith. You can't prove bodily resurrection is impossible. God can do anything. Science can subvert philosophy, but even science can't attack that claim. If any article of faith can be verified by science, then that's good. But there will be others, like the afterlife, and Day of Judgment, which apparently cannot. Such matters must be believed on faith, and I think it will remain that way for the foreseeable future, perhaps forever. Ghazzali was right. Believe in it because scripture says so. That's just about all you can do.
