Can u try to understand how stupid you seem at some points and how your promoting vr like some sort of miracle of thid generation have you used a dawm headset have you scan and tested how much these craps fry the human brain have you ever considered that theres just to much excesive radition in your dawm brain shen you hace to wear a Wifi modem and a bluethooth headset in your hesd for a few hours you just dont understand your promoting killing machines. These garbage thing emit to much radiation to the brain we will be a cancer epidemic thanks to people of tech that whant to kill the human body in order to read our heart beats or track our eyes is seems and feels pathetic at this point. Have you even used a EMF detector can yoj please do the test buy a headset connect it to wifi put you account log on to the internet and measure the EMF Fiel then you will tell me a story.
Quest 3S is chicken and egg problem. You say VR should be more desireable before going cheaper.. but how do you make more desireable content if youre shackled to Q2 specs? I think its the logical correct choice to replace the Q2 option with something with performance parity. The devs will follow the customers. The customers will follow the devs content. Back and forth, so on, chicken and egg. Gotta rip the bandaid off.
The funny thing is Meta easily became the 1# tech leader in the world not Samsung or Apple. Hard to tell you guys the truth for Facebook/Meta haters out there
Meta Orion is what Google Lens should always have been. A product that do have actual real life use with augmented reality. VR still has a long way to go to offer satisfying uses. Augmented reality has much more practical use. Starting from museums and tourists.
Those orion glasses are genuinely innovative even though I hate facebook and do not trust them at all to use any hardware made by them. Now would people pay to buy AR glasses, don't know, maybe they could occupy a niche like smartwatches. The neural wrist control thing looks cool and probably has more applications for now, so I agree they'd probably make it available/license it out first.
1:00 Apple has MORE than proven Palmer wrong and that strategy doesn't work with the wet fart that has been the Vision Pro. Going high end as possible is a terrible strategy. Quest otoh has sold over 30 million units! With the Quest 2 being by FAAAAAR the majority of that. Why? THE $299 PRICE!!! VR is ALREADY good enough (especially for gamers) to be more than enjoyable and useful enough for people if the price is right. This isn't 2019 anymore. 🤷 The problem simply isn't the hardware anymore. It's software and accessibility.
If lg rolls this so called feature to past models, i will turn my tv off before the screen saver is activated. Or just never update my tv again and it will be my last LG monitor or tv forever. If the tv was stupidly cheap or free then yeah, you get what you pay for (or not) but it is BS if you bought a product they would force you to ads.
6:03 Worth noting that the Samsung Tab S10 Ultra features Mediatek's Dimensity 9300+ chip instead of Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8 gen 3. This is notable because Mediatek, already the largest ARM SOC producer by volume, has been eating up marketshare across budget and midrange segments, and is now aggressively pursuing the flagship market with value-competitive chips (matching Qualcomm +/- 5-10% on key performance metrics, at a 15-30% lower cost). It seems Qualcomm's historically insuperable IP and chip design moat may be deteriorating in mobile, even as ARM reference designs promise to deliver competition in laptop SOCs as well. Mediatek announced end of 2023 that they're developing laptop chips targeted at 2025 release. Speculating that these will feature ARM X5 cores, and possibly Nvidia graphics (there is an existing Nvidia collaboration, but unclear whether it extends beyond auto chips). Fingers crossed 🤞
Cool, but not interested in all this. I need two 17 inch monitors, and a mini pc on the table, ruining them and 64gb ram, with Terra byte storage. Under 1000 euros.
Password reminder questions should allow the user to create their own questions and answers. This can raise the level of security that only the user could have know. Things like "what bone did you break going to school in 1973?"
This guy is like the best and not so best youtuber that i personally follow. I have been watching his stuff and i like the presentation and slight opinions he has. I would loooove to have a 30 minute discussion with him about all things tech. Cheers from Nairobi, Kenya
Nebula viewer, who does not have social media, do you have a questions email we can hit up. Mine would look into the idea floating about that AMD might buy up some Intel parts.
VR needs to be affordable as well, even if it's super specked up and featured up, if it's unaffordable, no one will buy it, so it will become tech waste. Look at the Apple Vision Pro... it has a lot of "good" features, but it's so overpriced, it's just not worth it. By having people use the headset, you can then improve it and innovate. If no one uses it, there's no incentive to innovate.
So to clarify here, NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) is not a regulatory agency they cannot create laws. The federal government is not creating a law around passwords. NIST creates common standards for EVERYTHING. There is a standard for peanut butter. And these standards are used by various companies/or government bodies as a baseline for the quality of their products / security of their platforms etc. NIST is updating the old Standards for passwords based on new knowledge accrued over time that the old requirements for passwords were hurting security. All they are doing is getting with the times based on new studies. This is a good thing!
Much the same as the DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung (German Institute for Standardization) which most people will know mostly for car head unit sizes. These places do good work.
