The PLC Professor RU-vid Channel is soley dedicated to technical education, specifically industrial control systems and their supporting technologies. The "Complete PLCLearn Series" is comprised of lectures, hands on lab projects and lab project wrap up discussions. The playlists, available at the PLC eUniversity website, to use for the series are titled "Lectures", "Basics" lab discussions, "Advanced I" lab discussions and "Advanced II" lab discussions. There is also a "Support" playlist for miscellaneous supporting knowledge, "RSLogix5000", "How to Program", as well as many more to come. These lectures and lab projects were developed for actual classroom training and have been improved as hundreds of electricians and engineers completed and commented on the content.
In the Tuning procedure, is the motor remaining uncouple or couple with gearbox and machinery? When we change a new motor or new inverter or change a new power cable, should we repeat the tuning procedure?
I stumbled across epistemology a couple years ago. I appreciate the video. I've found peace with the teachings of Orthodox Christianity. God bless your channel!
Bella spiegazione, c'è tantissima confusione su come funzionano questi sistemi software e questo video risponde a tante domande, grazie per questo video, mi hai aiutato a comprendere RSLogix per il mio corso di studio.
Wrong. Simple as that. Monitor...the device...what your wrong on is how the device is monitored. The device can me monitored, logged, and trended easily in HMI code and (importantly) arranged logically as to function which may or may not be how/where it was written.
So many of the online PLC training courses the instructor is just a programmer but has no training on how to teach and how people learn. Do you have any certified training on how to teach and how people actually learn?
I was just 10 years old when I had my first interaction with automation. It was with BASIC on 8bit PC in 1984. Actually, it was my mother's second husband to explained how to connect all the el. appliances at home to the computer and control them. When I started the PLC course I was somehow disappointed in the ladder logic as was already programming Arduino on C++ which is much easier. But a couple of weeks later I understood that is much more important to understand the ladder logic especially the relay logic which actually is based on Boolean algebra. In my opinion, if you don't know what are logic gates and binary system there's no point in losing your time trying to be a professional PLC programmer.
Where can I find this Course. Ive been looking for a Training Program to further my PLC knowledge and Ive heard good things about SolisPLC. Could tou provide a linkbto the Course. Thanks.
Your whole point around ST being worse than LD is demonstrated on like the simplest hello-world a PLC can do. Your standpoint is like from 30 years ago, things have changed alot! Also you picked a manufacturer which is not capable of live debugging ST, which is not ST's fault. I can see the variable value live and can change it by a single click or force it with 2 clicks on a beckhoff system. Even your big statemachine in the main POU does almost nothing other than setting some booleans. how would you even begin to iterate over some 1000 structurized member array ? - oh wait you guys would copy paste the same logic a thousand times. Have you even mentioned breakpoints ? Or is your plc also incapable of that? With no word you mentioned the extended IEC-61131 object-oriented ST, which to me is another sign that even if you did program BASIC or FORTRAN years ago, you don't actually really get how modern PLC is/could be programmed, or do you know what an Interface-POU is and why it is used? The only point you have is that electricians won't be capable of debugging ST code, which is kinda true. But then again, try to program a modern big machine on like LD, it is gonnna be a nightmare and you cost way more than any electrician trying to fix ST logic. And if ST delivers faster, most companies will take ST-coded machines.
rs500 is legacy software at this point. Studio 5000 is the standard nowadays, highly complex, and very expensive. I had to learn C# just to get a full grasp on studio 5000. Rs500 is the template to start with, not CCW or 5000 in my opinion. I really only see 1400s or 1100s in the field today, but still they are legacy.
Totally disagree! LD is good when machine is simple. However, modern machines are so complicated making LD unsuitable for the job. The reason technicians can't troubleshoot ST is because they are not trained to read ST. I worked with many European and Chinese technicians. They all understand ST and are good at it too. Hence, nowadays there are many tools and IDEs that make troubleshooting code easier. In addition, to improve code quality we can implement unit test, regression test, automated test with ST. For example, after code change, I can let the computer run tests overnight and see how many of them failed. Can LD do that? Also, I can track my changes using source control instead of change the project name to V1.1 V1.2 V1.3... My team members can develop other features without affecting my work and we can merge our code once they are completed. How can I achieve that with LD?
what to do when the io modules do not exist in the catalog I am using a 5069-L320ER CPU I see two ethernet adapters A1, A2 when I go to New module, and look for 5069-IB16 or 5069-OW16 etc none of them are in the catalog I don't see anywhere to update the catalog. Yikes... seems rinkeydink amateurish considering the cost of this stuff
Hi, I would like to check with you if my drawing that I made for the CR30 is correct to use in 2 channels at the same time to have the possibility of controlling each one separately.
You don't happen to fix the control master throttle controller do you? I have 2 units, iv narrowed it down to the hand held throttle as being bad..I plug in one remote and the trains run fine, I plug in the other and nothing, the direction work on it though as I can hear the relay switch over in the power box..and, the momentum light illuminates..but nothing from the pot ..
You are right. With all the new gadgets and technology, we've collectively lost our way since the late 70's. All this tech should make the machine totally able to tell you totally whatever is wrong with it. All assuming that the electrical and process design captured enough information to do so.
