The Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) RU-vid Channel, is a channel dedicated to showing you everything that Discovers, funds, shapes, and champions basic research that revolutionizes the future of the United States Air Force.
hey, jeune enfant de salope d'Amnesty International, ta mère la pute au roi de France, t'es l'air mal dans ta peau, t'es seul dans la région parisienne ? qu est ce que tu fais là ? tu comprends le français ? viens là !!!!!
Naming your simulation software *"MAGIC"* is sad as fuck. You people really need to get laid... Or invent a better sex robot... *"MAGIC"* Pfft... Pathetic. Oooh... *"we used **_MAGIC..._** "*
Nice talk, unfortunately what I didn't get from it is how with 3D-DCT the implicit zeros were truncated while still maintaining frame integrity. The problem with MPEG coders is cascaded state machine upset. It is usually not until the next I frame that the state vector can be recovered and resynchronised. It seems to me that the application layer doesn't need to know specifics of the channel coding, it only needs to be aware of the hamming dimensions and distances of the available symbols, so rather than coding to bits, it codes to symbols, with the knowledge that all symbols are not equidistant, and thus all bit errors are not equally likely. Then it can code structural information such as NAL unit size as large Hamming distances, and code nearby symbols to have the same or similar residuals and equivalent structural effect.
Obviously, in traditional wireless systems the signal is scrambled so that any given bit error is equally likely, to improve interference rejection and error correcting coding effectiveness.
Holy Crap ! aahh - I just can't aahh believe aahh how duh educaded people aahh can really aahh be irraaaahh-tating. Humm, aahh, like they humm don't know aahh what to say aahh next. Like humm their humm neural connections aahh between ah their brain hum and duhh their toungue ahh is not humm firering duh proper-aaahh-ly. Aaahh, I aahh had enough aahh after duh seven aahh no, eight humm minutes. WT'aahh-F !!
Wow, in the first 3:48, up to the point where he introduces Chad Mirkin, He said aaahh 58 times and duh once. hahaha, yes I have to much time on my hands.
This video suggests to me that dip-pen nanotechnology can bootstrap to Feynman/Drexlerian nanomanufacturing. He tends to get disquieted when even approaching such a possibility.
the rest of this video is a real eye-opener. I know that I just follow nanotechnology by what they give me on general science news sites. I don't go around asking nanotechnologists what else is out there; but, I've also thought, "you know they're doing all kinds of things." This video confirms that! I'm watching this many months after uploading.
I don't agree with this guys putting molecular electronics alongside cold fusion, superconductivity, and artificial leaf; these are in a different category(no, I didn't mean category theory) from cold fusion.
nanomanufacturing did not come about because of science fiction; Richard Feynman just decided to see what was possible technologicaly; he didn't take to it for some mysterious reason. Eric Drexler thought of it himself and championed it; he didn't get it from sci-fi; he got it from reading biotech in science journals.
