Everything related to 3D Forensics! 3D Software and Hardware reviews, tutorials, 3D forensic animations, photogrammetry and laser scanning examples. Created by Eugene Liscio - 3D Forensic Analyst from Canada.
Fantastic and very insightful ! I am in Australia but have a degree in criminology and criminal justice and currently doing my law degree and looking specifically into wrongful convictions in the U.S during the 1970's and 1980's ... microscopic hair analysis and fire investigations to be specific. Really appreciate this great video :)
Where is the end result? I went through your whole videos can’t find any. I mean you could have made it easier for us by posting result in caption or something.
In 2004 Bin Laden put out a message stating responsibility for the attacks.......yeah I'd want the US military after me for something I didn't do. What a bunch of bullshit this crap is. Wake up people and waste your energy on something more pertinent.
Wow so he have admitting before he was coached Your words correct Boney is not think his prints were there.. on Camm put them there and has not regard for it .
Can ripped off the sweater and planted it and ohhh how convient You brainack , check the collar 😂😂 This actually is not funny Boney did not murder the guns he sold did so that is why he is taking responsibility for that hug he should not take all those years Makes me so sick Camms are everywhere that is why people fight back
He didn't have enough dirt on anyone who didn't support his story Ya know birds of a feather All his teammates / cops have each other backs Brother system American needs to have an alternate system that actual check on cops and the DOJ
Fools! Camm is guilty I knew it instantly. I cannot fathom the stupity or I take for granted that I have decrement. Camm had all the card being in law enforcement and as a cop planned this very thoughtfully.
The rush to judgement is one of the most egregious operant in the judicial system. Things were overlooked, minds were made up too quickly, physical evidence was ignored (oops 😬 much there Mr. Prosecutor?) Grr I am a wife of 40+ years and things are challenging in marriage period. Just because they put the Scarlet "A" upon him like Hester Prynne does not a murderer make. That might be motive to get rid of her - but his kids? When there are 10 witnesses who place him playing basketball?! Did they get their forensics degrees thru Crackerjack?! Did they not know cleaning drying blood, in quantity, is not a job for a fairly clean mop and bucket as found. They keyed in on him within 10-15 minutes.
I am really greatful for your tutorials!! Thank you very much! - What I would like to know is if there is any option to export a PointCloud again? E.g. I imported a PC from a .ply file, reduced its points, and now I would like to export it to .ply again. Is that at all possible?
"WOAH SOMEONE ON RU-vid SAID IT WAS A CONSPIRACY WOAH I TOTALLY BELIEVE THEM" Get a fucking life. There is NO REAL EVIDENCE to back up your bullshit claims.
I'm not an engineer I'm just using my common sense so if the plane flew into the corner of the building and took out four floors the fire of that area of four floors would weaken the structure to my estimation just by weight as far as where it was on that building that is in all of the building were to fall apart it would just be the top floors to the actual Impact Zone and by the weight of that maybe 10 more fours below but then it would slide off of the building not go directly down I have no engineering degree to me that's common sense
@@Larry26-f1w More than 90% of the bodies were never recovered, it was mostly just pieces of bodies. About 30% of the victims were not identified with some recovered DNA sample. What does that mean?
The buildings aren’t rigid, solid structures. There were many structural elements such as brackets, trusses, beams, etc. which all had different strengths, failure modes, etc. Compromising large portions of the structure meant it was inevitable that more elements would fail and that was compounded in the twin towers and wtc7 by the out of control fires which further weakened elements in each building.
This guy's full of it if, he doesn't know this was a controlled demolition. He rambles on and, takes forever to get to the point. I can't watch all of this junk.
There was liquid metal at the bases of the towers and seen falling from the floors of the towers. Thermite. Obvious controlled demolitions of all buildings. Something was needed to start wars and the grabbing of oil resources. Sick America.
this was the work of our government, you know what the biggest give away is? Cars were bursting into flames blocks away, this was a top secret weapon that was used many videos have been taken down but it was a direct energy weapon that was used.
how accurate is it compared to 3d scanners which are now becoming more and more affordable? some of the scanners have gone wireless and have built in CPU, so they do the processing on the scanner instead of doing it on a tablet pc/computer? also do you give any application training on how 3d scanners/3d scanning apps can be used for forensics?
which monopod and phone adapter were you using? sorry for asking this, am not in USA/Europe so getting stuff in my country is hard and better to invest once in good products.
@@timshea4279 Plenty of resources online or ask an engineer. Watch the video and look at the images which show how a steel frame structure differs. If you are suggesting they are the same, then explain in detail your reasoning.
The jet fuel lasted about 10 minutes. And normal office fires reach temperatures in excess of 1000C. Certainly high enough to weaken steel to the point of failure.
Thanks Dr. Hulsey and your team. For the total collapse of the lower part to ground level the falling upper part of each Twin Towers the upper part would have had to magically increased its weight five or six times in order to crush of the lower part made up of thicker/stronger steel. We know that cannot happen. The outcome of upper lighter section should have resulted as occurs when car impacts a semi truck. The car is smashed, and the semi-truck moves very little away from the car. A five to one ratio in weight is easy for most people to guess what will happen. ------------------------------------- A good video/lecture as to why we need a new FBI investigation or new Congressional investigation of 9/11 part one WTC7 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-DXAuYjcjjPo.html Part 2: NIST’s false statements about the Twin Towers' collapse ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-J6F16xBQPMU.html Part 3: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2YLaPD7AVJE.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xWi0x9xigQM.html World Trade Center building Seven (WTC7) had fire proofing covering all the steel beams in it and it was not hit by an airplane. Dr. Leroy Halsey said no main stream media has interviewed him. April 6, 2024: Professor, Zdeněk P. Bažant submitted an analysis to the ASCE's Journal of Engineering Mechanics that contained glaring errors and inaccurate assumptions to explain why the Twin Towers collapsed following the airplane impacts. Roland Angle, working with mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti think they have found mathematical errors in his analysis that ignore certain fundamental laws of physics and which destroy the foundation on which National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) based its theory of for why the progressive collapse occurred. Therefore the NIST reports were highly unscientific and merely papered over the easily observable evidence that explosives caused the Twin Towers' destruction. The NIST report on the destruction of the towers, published in 2005 only gave a hypothetical explanation for the initiation of the failures of the Twin Towers. It did not describe the mechanics of the total collapses of the Twin Towers and specifically endorsed Bažant’s theory to explain how the 110 story towers experienced complete collapse. Bažant grossly overestimated input values that would be destructive and grossly underestimated input values that would be resistive. The 2001 Anthrax Letter Attacks that enhanced the lie that Iraq had WMDs. Source: see this URL ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-j6MKBJSLqJc.html Kevin Ryan is the foremost authority on what happened that day as Editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies A RU-vid video of him being interviewed. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Xrnx5yhihj8.html And when the US Attorney, The Court of Appeals, and the US Supreme Court refuses to empanel a grand jury to judge the direct evidence that proves explosions and/or incendiaries caused the total collapses of the World Trade Center buildings, our representative democracy is disabled. The odds? Lt. Colonel David Gapp tell us about 9/11 Aviation Improbabilities facebook.com/watch/?v=1491828354927727&aggr_v_ids[0]=1491828354927727¬if_id=1700307835597620¬if_t=watch_follower_video&ref=notif What are the odds the alleged hijackers would know where over the US to turn off the airplanes transponder and where to make a u-turn to better not be seen on the ATC/Norad radar screens? What are the odds of them flying a 330 degree coordinate-flight turn from 7,000 feet and hitting the Pentagon, when skilled pilots could only do this one in three attempts in a simulator? ZERO None of the passengers could have made a cell phone to report the alleged hijackers with box cutters, because the airplanes were too high and flying at some 500 mph. IMPOSSIBLE. What are the odds that eight airline’s pilots would allow the alleged hijackers to take over their airplane? And the odds of taking over the four airplanes without pilots turning the airplane upside down to knock the alleged hijacker off their feet? What are the odds of the very unskilled hijacker pilots hitting the Twin Towers at some 500 mph? ZERO. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as the leading engineering organization in the United States, also abetted the crime by endorsing NIST's fraudulent 9/11 reports and attempting to shut down any challenge to the official story within their membership. This link explains the science that proves NIST and ASCE are guilty of lying to Americans. NIST therefore lied to the US Congress who had task NIST which is under the Department of Commerce to explain how and why the three World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11. NIST DID NOT explain why or how the Twin Towers totally collapsed. That alone is violation of the tasking Congress ordered to be done of a mass murder incident. Never before nor after 9/11 has any steel high rise building ever collapse due to fire, as was the case of World Trade Center building seven and the wreckage piles of all three buildings remain unexplained too hot and producing white smoke for over a month. The New York Fired department poured massive amounts of water onto this wreckage, yet the heat and white smoke continued for over a month and therein pointing to a fire burning in the wreckage. Given this smoke was only white also is evidence that the white smoke was aluminum oxide produced by the burning of nano-thermite which burns even under water. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-X_U6v7MqDzE.html Some new information about why WTC7 collapsed ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KMvCWFCoVN4.html for my book “9/11 Direct Evidence” Send me an email at dickmcmanus55@aol.com and I will reply with the book for FREE From: Richard McManus Chief Warrant Officer-3/counterintelligence special agent, US Army, retired, BS psychology and nursing, Everett, WA
'Thanks Dr. Hulsey and your team. From your good friends at the self licking ice cream known as AE911T (even though there are very architects, very few engineers and not an ounce of truth). Your report is money well spent for our "cause" 😉'
I have been torn on this one for years! Somehow Came Across his name Again and i went down the rabbit hole. I will rethink the evidence BUT i am still struck with what is the likelihood of a mother and child/children being murdered in the garage? Slim, that is the likelihood, unless targeted. But i believe in the fact the evidence needs to be beyond a reasonable doubt.
Sorry my bad did Building 7 come down differently than the towers? Just because they were ruled as not being building collapses by the mathematical impossibility of making thousands of bodies disappear shouldn’t prejudice any judgement on 7
