Branagh looks like one of our lot. Seriously he looks like my uncle . But since I'm from an Irish background it's not so surprising. As my grandad used to say we've all got the same old faces.
Branagh is merely saying that Shakespeare used these phrases, not that he was necessarily the first to use them. Tongue tied and fast and loose had already been recorded before Shakespeare, to name but two.
I only speak right on quotes Mark Anthony in Julius Cesar. Communications have been sending my a Human reaction. My reaction is action. Happy New Year 2020 May Stick Man (\ ! /) be his T.V.B. { the very best } in a Hobbit Home for a made Hobbit. Brian that is Brian not a Zodiac Python Squeeze player. BAK
At the time of Shakespeare, actors were considered low-lifes. He raised acting to the level of low class entertainment and even built the Globe Theatre to for the setting of his plays. Acting became more acceptable until it reached it's zenith in the middle 20th century. Now it's fallen to the bottom again... Learn to read folks.
This is my frustration with 99.9% of Young's interference experiment explanations. As far as I can tell, the light is heavily filtered so that only an occasional photon makes it through. I find it incredibly annoying that I can't find a satisfactory explanation of how the experiment is enabled. It seems like an understanding of the mechanics of the photon generator and collector are an imperative step in accepting the results of the experiment. This link gives a better explanation but leaves me with more questions than it answers: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-I9Ab8BLW3kA.html
How do they make photons pass one at a time through an everyday bulb? Also, the really astonishing bit used to be that electrons were found to behave like waves - not photons. And the really odd bit was the change in behaviour of electrons when a detector was placed. Can anyone clarify?
I love the point. It's too bad Bernard Levin said it first Mr. Branagh is happy to not attribute the source (just sayin, since we're talking about quoting people): If you cannot understand my argument, and declare ``It's Greek to me'', you are quoting Shakespeare; if you claim to be more sinned against than sinning, you are quoting Shakespeare; if you recall your salad days, you are quoting Shakespeare; if you act more in sorrow than in anger; if your wish is farther to the thought; if your lost property has vanished into thin air, you are quoting Shakespeare; if you have ever refused to budge an inch or suffered from green-eyed jealousy, if you have played fast and loose, if you have been tongue-tied, a tower of strength, hoodwinked or in a pickle, if you have knitted your brows, made a virtue of necessity, insisted on fair play, slept not one wink, stood on ceremony, danced attendance (on your lord and master), laughed yourself into stitches, had short shrift, cold comfort or too much of a good thing, if you have seen better days or lived in a fool's paradise -why, be that as it may, the more fool you , for it is a foregone conclusion that you are (as good luck would have it) quoting Shakespeare; if you think it is early days and clear out bag and baggage, if you think it is high time and that that is the long and short of it, if you believe that the game is up and that truth will out even if it involves your own flesh and blood, if you lie low till the crack of doom because you suspect foul play, if you have your teeth set on edge (at one fell swoop) without rhyme or reason, then - to give the devil his due - if the truth were known (for surely you have a tongue in your head) you are quoting Shakespeare; even if you bid me good riddance and send me packing, if you wish I was dead as a door-nail, if you think I am an eyesore, a laughing stock, the devil incarnate, a stony-hearted villain, bloody-minded or a blinking idiot, then - by Jove! O Lord! Tut tut! For goodness' sake! What the dickens! But me no buts! - it is all one to me, for you are quoting Shakespeare.
When a photon comes from the sun, it is a wave only, as it goes through no atoms, between the sun and our atmosphere. Coronal mass ejection are sent out from time to time, but it is captured by our magnetic field. When the photon waves hits the atmosphere it exites atoms and is re-emitted when electrons is going down to its groundstate in the different atoms in the atmosphere towards the ground, and becomes a photon particle with mass. Those photons which has not interacted are still comming down as massless waves to ground, or our skin as radiation. What i dont know is if the waves or the particles that hit us who is dangerous. Which one? Remember, those waves which dont hit any atoms havent even hit any medium, but gone past all matter. Cus in between atoms there isnt any matter. Reason why sunscreen works, is that what makes up the sunscreen, those atoms/molecules its made from absorbs those high energy wave photons like in our atmosphere, and shoots out low energy photon particles out from our sunscreen.
In a real young's experiment, everything that needs to be evacuated,must be evacuated. And photons/electrons must be sent out controlled. Id like to do a super computer controlled experiment lol. Since wave or particle constantly interfere in an uncontrolled experiment.
Quoting Shakespeare is " quoting Shakespeare " now ! But as a matter of fact , much of what is attributed to him as " new " metaphors and expression " ect, is derived from Latin , like ect, and goes back much further than the Romans or ancient Greeks . It's all thin air , such lines weren't new in Shakespeare's day . The audience had heard it before and they were simply in accord with contemporary language of the day . Besides anything else , Shakespeare never wrote a single original play of his own .
That seems to be ignoring the fact that he straight up made words and phrases. Shows some examples of words he came up with that were already well known in Shakespeare's day that came from the Romans or Ancient Greeks.
@@LordVader1094 you caught me on the hop . Will dig out some examples for you soon as can . There are so many . Another ponder in the meantime is , how could an audience hearing all these new words and phrases for the first time know what hell he was babbling about ? It's clear , I think , that the audience was well familiar with it all .
Reginald Scot's _Discoverie of Witchcraft_ does not use the phase "Play fast and loose". Chapter 19 of Book 13 does contains the sentence "A notable seat of fast or loose", which is clearly the inspiration for "play fast and loose", but not the phrase itself. It still leaves Shakespeare as the earliest report of the fully developed phrase.
This video is mind-blowing. Its one thing to hear about the "double-slit experiment" blah blah blah, but when you see it with your own eyes, its truly worldview-shattering.... like "WTF IS GOING ON!??" Reality is mysterious asf
Is there the corresponding video, where particle detectors are located in each slit? I have asked this a lot of time, but no one has ever come with these experimental results. Is this an urban myth?
