This channel is for HyperLyceum.com and we are trying to provide tutorial videos for students. Our goal is to provide opportunities for you to share your knowledge. For more information please contact: Administrator@hyperlyceum.com
Hi, thank you for the video. I tried Visual Studio 2019 with oneAPI Base and HPC from 2023 and it works (linking with Abaqus 2020). Could you share the exemplary benchmark you simulated?
@@arghyauthpalmondal6827 I'm sorry, but I did it on someone else's computer with the installer they had. But if you find an installer from the Visual Studio 2019 Community, for example, let me know! (I'm also searching for it)
@@arghyauthpalmondal6827 I'm sorry, but I did it on someone else's computer with the installer they had in hand. But if you find an installer of the Visual Studio 2019 Community, for example, let me know! (I'm also searching for it)
SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM! Abaqus is connected to Fortran, but verification fails. I suggest the following solutions in order: - in SIMULIA folder find file "abaqus_v6.env", edit in notepad and add at the end the line: link_sl='LINK /NODEFAULTLIB:LIBCMT.LIB /dll /def:%E /out:%U %F %A %L %B' - in SIMULIA folder find file "custom_v6.env", edit in notepad and add at the end the line: compile_fortran += ['/names:lowercase',] - use visual studio 2019 instead of 2022 (but that's just my guess) There is also a much easier way to connect Fortran to Abaqus: After installing visual studio, Intel OneAPI and Intel OneAPI HPC, just find the launcher.bat file in the SIMULIA folder and edit it in notepad. After the line: @echo off add the line: call "C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\oneAPI\compiler\latest\env\vars.bat" intel64 vs2019 (or vs2022 depending on version of visual studio) and that's it. No need to add environment variables, edit shortcut paths, etc. The command line will show that Fortran is not connected, but it will work in CAE anyway.
Thank you for the interesting video, I have followed all the steps and all is OK and even the link is established for Abaqus files and not only shortcut. the command "abaqus info=system" works well and i see the Fortran compiler well set up. However, in the verifying step, I have an error
I get this error: ***ERROR: ELEMENT 771 INSTANCE PART-1-1 CANNOT BE ADDED USING *MODEL CHANGE IF IT IS NOT REMOVED OR INACTIVE IN THE PREVIOUS STEP ***NOTE: DUE TO AN INPUT ERROR THE ANALYSIS PRE-PROCESSOR HAS BEEN UNABLE TO INTERPRET SOME DATA. SUBSEQUENT ERRORS MAY BE CAUSED BY THIS OMISSION It seems like the deactivation is not being correctly performed. I double checked the pre-step and it is defined as you specify. Any hint on what could be the problem?
hello I am a young enthusiast of fluid mechanics...I am doing a simulation regarding atmospheric flows and I would like to know how to write the C++ code to have the normal speed at the level of a patch and not throughout the domain...I tried everything but nothing I need help please
Thank you for the details. I followed every step as per the instructions. The abaqus info=system command shows that the link has been established. However, the verify command ends up in an error when checking for the subroutine. I would appreciate any help.
Hey, thank you very much for your vedio. I'm pretty sure that I had followed every step correctly. but when I verify my abaqus info(by using: abq2023 info=system), it showed : C++ Compiler: Unable to locate or determine the version of a C++ compiler on this system. If a C++ compiler is installed on this system, please load vcvars64.bat file before running Abaqus others are all correct. I checked other community, there are also some people have same problem with mine. I would like to ask that do you have any solution for this error? thank you!
Hi thank you for the video. I followed every steps; however, my verification has failed instead of pass. I noticed that when I opened the command window, the prompt is C:\Windows\System32 instead of C:\temp. Could that be the reason? (When I use C:\Windows\System32\abaqus info=system in the command window, the results shows that my Fortran compiler has been linked but the verification failed). I’d appreciate your insights! Thank you! 🙏
Hi, I followed the same procedure, but still i am facing error. I am trying to link the fortran with abaqus2023. linking part is ok. but verification part failed and giving errors. Please help me out. I am using VS2022 + Abaqus 2023 + latest version of oneAPI toolkits this is the error Verify test : Abaqus/Standard with user subroutines verification .. log located at C:\temp\verify\user_std\user_std.log result : ERROR : Abaqus/Standard with user subroutines verification ------------------------------------------------------------ Verify test : Abaqus/Explicit with user subroutines verification - 'Abaqus/Explicit single precision user subroutine' Failed. - 'Abaqus/Explicit double precision user subroutine' Failed. .. log located at C:\temp\verify\user_exp\user_exp.log result : ERROR : Abaqus/Explicit with user subroutines verification linking part C++ Compiler: Microsoft Visual C++ 14.39.33523.0 Linker Version: Microsoft (R) Incremental Linker Version 14.39.33523.0 Fortran Compiler: Intel Fortran Compiler 2021.12 MPI: MS-MPI 10.1.12498.18
Hi sir, thank you so much for sharing such type of very informative video. I am currently working on a simulation for thermo-mechanical analysis, when i go for mechanical analysis, getting this type of error; The volume of two elements is zero, small, or negative. Check coordinates or node numbering, or modify the mesh seed. In the case of a tetrahedron this error may indicate that all nodes are located very nearly in a plane. The elements have been identified in element set ErrElemVolSmallNegZero. Plz suggest a solution for it. Thank you.
Verify test : Abaqus/Standard with user subroutines verification .. log located at C:\Windows\System32\verify\user_std\user_std.log result : ERROR : Abaqus/Standard with user subroutines verification How to fix this error?I have installed Vs2019+HPC&Base(2024.1)+Abq2023 for windows 10 pro
thank you sir for this video , i have one question I have a question concerning abaqus, I have modeled a hollow sphere in abaqus, and I have applied a radial displacement in the inner surface, but when I run the simulation, I get the following error 1 nodes have dof on which velocity/displacement/acceleration/base motion etc.constraintq are specified simultaneously.the nodes have been identified in node set ErrNodeBCRedundandDof
For two-dimensional models, if a non-unity thickness is specified for two-dimensional solid elements and these elements are involved in an interaction such as contact, the same thickness should be specified for the out-of-plane thickness of the corresponding surface under *surface interaction.
Why did you explain it like that? I wasted so much time because you confused me. For anyone attempting to replicate the simulation, please DO NOT follow the previous instructions. In the user subroutine interface, FIELD(1) should be set equal to the radius. Abaqus utilizes this value to evaluate the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio based on the 3rd column, which represents the radius in this case, NOT THE YOUNG'S MODULUS! The current code is incorrect. The key thing to understand about USDFLD is that FIELD(1) corresponds to the Field 1 column in the definition of the material model. So, you should simply write FIELD(1)=r, and then Abaqus can identify the appropriate row in the tabular data. Hyper Lyceum, instead of helping me, you confused me. If you don't know something, don't upload videos claiming to be experts!
THIS KEYWORD IS NOT AVAILABLE IN Abaqus/Explicit Analysis will be terminated Analysis Input File Processor exited with an error. i am getting this error can you please help me
THIS KEYWORD IS NOT AVAILABLE IN Abaqus/Explicit Analysis will be terminated Analysis Input File Processor exited with an error. can you please help me
For two-dimensional models, if a non-unity thickness is specified for two-dimensional solid elements and these elements are involved in an interaction such as contact, the same thickness should be specified for the out-of-plane thickness of the corresponding surface under *surface interaction.........................can you explain about this problem please
I have a question, I think we need to define the FIELD(1) =radius instead of Young's modulus because we defined the Field 1 in material behaviors. Don't you think like that?