I don’t pretend perfection but the idea that we live in a multidimensional multiverse is the most exciting, since consciousness creates materiality. The energy of thought, belief, action allows reality of wanted or wanted human awareness. Therefore, the delightful is fundamentally possible and probable as a way of viewing possibility. So, Whatyagonnado dear creator of your deserved and chosen reality. 🐝kind Thank you. 🎶💥🎯🌸
Why don’t physicists turn their vast brains to the actual mysteries of the Universe . Very simply .. no physicist worth his tenure would ever consider that the THING .. he has been studying for decades (The Universe ) is beyond all reason that a materialist could muster … actually … a living conscious organismic entity. A holon continuous with the holon that is our living body and it’s environment.. The Earth 🌍 The Universe (all that is was and will be ) It’s absolutely incredible that 99% of Physicists have never realised that a non living/conscious thing CANNOT give rise to/create, a living entity .. that being … you me the teaming life that this planet IS (not forgetting organisms in hot rock 2 miles down) It’s about time those studying electric field processes in the micro (living )Universe of the cell … (biologists) started being listened to News just in … Other relevant disciplines than Physics do exist and have valuable perspectives on the relationship between micro life and the macro enfolded entangled apparently living conscious Universe … which is not divisible from that micro living stage . Dependant origination anyone? Biology needs to start informing the arrogant kingdom of dead unconscious physics .. the land where everything studied is assumed to be devoid of life and consciousness. Come on … think outside the militant materialist box you were cooked in .. at school and University. How could pure energy PLASMA “ grow” Einstein via the process of its unfolding (with space time, transcendent math/geometry.. Information, the 4 forces … entropy .. on and on . How could that have grown Einstein via some clumping and cooling and waiting around .. via stars planets seas 🌊 and cells 🦠 💃🏽 … if that was not the same process as seed to tree … egg 🥚 to ME. It’s staggering that 99% of physicists can’t m/won’t see what I’m getting at. No one know how chemistry became conscious biology … NO ONE. Yet physicists assume that the Universe cannot possibly be organismic … cannot embody everything relevant to the life it unfolded at every dimension and stage of its being /existence /(likely) cyclic .. development . It’s truly shocking It’s as if they are trying to avoid this vast paradigm shift Yip …. Found out! The religion of militant materialism … just keeps on rollin’ This is partially why our society/environment is in the mess it’s in … blind science/tech wedded to unenlightened capitalism and religio political /ideological structures … which have no interest in the fact of a living conscious (at all system levels) Universe … a living Earth 🌍 = 1
I wonder if Sean‘s interest in the possibility of one extra macro spatial dimension is related to Geoffrey west‘s work on scaling in complex systems and power laws that have exponents as fractions divided by 4
I love everything about Sean Carroll. You are so good at explaining, and I love cats too, the max. Your obliteration of fine tuning with WLac will stick with me the rest f my life. You utterly well.. you won.
PLEASE PEOPLE WE REALLY REALLY NEED to hear Sean Carroll respond to/ debunk/ describe what might be interesting or true about Terrance Howards theories
Sean: the Big Bang is the beginning of our local observable region of the universe but it's not the beginning of the universe as a whole. Brian: I wish religious people could wrap their heads around this concept of what the Big Bang is instead of "thinking" Scientists claim it's "something from nothing". It gets so tiring in the comment section and discussions on RU-vid. Gr8! Peace ☮💜Love
To make the world a better place make beef more expensive. That's the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard in my life. Sean wants poor people to starve to death. Has he never read a book by someone who didn't have money to eat ?! To make the world a better place we should have peoples lifes in front of money.
"Make beef more expensive, to make less desirqble systematically for everyone in the world " except for rich people, like people who spend hundreds of dollars on a bottle of wine... like yourself. Beef comes from cows, cows ARE the environment, they can't be bad for the environment. "But muh methane" already disproven.
Some of us crave absolutes that offer simple Always or Never answers. Getting into the weeds of almost any subject introduces conditionalities and complexities. For my taste, you deliver the perfect proportions so that a thoughtful, if non-mathematical, person can grasp the essentials. So what if it takes a little work?
this west centric bullshit of saying aristotle was the FIRST ever great figure in the history of physics, like what about egyptian , indians way before and better than aristotle
"... OK, the universe is expanding ... enormous and completely independent lines of evidence that support the same idea ..." Think about the phenomenon of confirmation bias. According to Theodosius Dobzhansky, "Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution." Think about 2 possibilities: (1) Nothing in the foundations of physics makes sense except in the light of string theory. (2) There is now overwhelming empirical evidence in favor of string theory, because all of the empirical successes of Milgrom's MOND are also empirical successes of string theory (in some form). Is Professor Milgrom of the Weizmann Institute the Kepler of contemporary cosmology? Does string theory with the infinite nature hypothesis imply the approximate validity of the Friedmann cosmological model & an explanation of dark matter in terms of paradoxical MOND inertia? Does string theory with Fredkin's finite nature hypothesis imply the Riofrio-Sanejouand cosmological model and explanations of both dark matter & dark energy as consequences of disruption of graviton spin by string vibrations? Google "koide lestone mond". I conjecture: I am correct about Gravity Probe B's 4 ultra-precise gyroscopes & the Gravity Probe B science team is wrong about the 4 ultra-precise gyroscopes. Google "gravity probe b david brown".
How have physicists gone for 22 years without discussing and demanding accurate data on the distribution of steel down the Twin Towers? Did level 105 contain the same amount of steel as the 5th level which had to support the weight of 21 times as many stories? Why is the Eiffel Tower shaped like that?
The question was rhetorical. My take is: consciousness is fundamental. Mind emerges with quantum events. Neither originated in biology or a Darwinian muddy pond. That is 19th Century materialism which was clueless about consciousness, the three forces, kinds of electricity, electromagnetism, and magnetism, not to mention DNA and the cell.
Поменяем схемы, подключения оптоволоконной обмотки?? Меняется вся Вселенная!❤! Вот для сравнения: Подобных теории как ОТО. Эйнштейна уже написано 1001, из них опубликованных в популярных журналах более 150. Но за 150 лет, не одного прямого (выполненные на 50% есть) опыта для этих теорий. Вы готовы посмотреть на обнаженную Вселенную без шумового *загрязнения* из 1001 теории? При детектирование гравитационных волн, детектором LIGO, полезный сигнал 0,2% на шум приходится 99,8%. По другому можно сказать. - Если случайно совпадают шумы (мусор), на двух или трёх детекторах, то выдадут это за гравитационные волны, используя шаблоны как сепаратор. На “ГИБРИД оптическом гироскопе" при регистрации, квантов гравитации оптом. Возможно полезные сигнал получим 74% и на шумы 26%. - Вам выбирать рулетку, что измеряет Вселенную и из чего, главное она состоит. Итак автотранспорт или самолёт в нём выполним опыты Майкельсона-Морли, определяя им прямолинейную скорость. - О таком опыте мечтал, ещё Эйнштейн. Но мы, *возможно* будем наблюдать постулаты "Свет это упорядоченная вибрация гравитационных квантов. Доминантные гравитационные поля управляют скоростью света в вакууме". Есть предложение на совместное изобретения ГИБРИД гироскопа из некруглых, ДВУХ катушек с новым типом оптического волокна с «полой сердцевиной из фотоно-замещенной вакуумной зоной или (NANF)», где - свет в каждом плече проходит по 48000 метров при этом, не превышает параметры 40/40/40 см., и вес - 4кг. Предприятия по выпуску "Волоконно-оптических гироскопов" может выпускать ГИБРИД гироскопы, для учебно практического применения в школах и для ВУЗ. Рационализатор из Казахстана.
To the person who asked for lectures that explain the formulas... Leonard Susskind has online lectures on just abput all physics subjects. They're pretty hard core fpr example: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5VKyRVLMMQ4.htmlsi=nlIjMlNV_a7pkADQ
Id live to ask about my idea of intergalactic voids being giant moving energy fields. When they collide, where the collision velocity approaches speed of light (SOL), time dilation and space contraction happen, collapsing the space into tiny spinning fields. When we observe these fields, we need to acceptbwe are also moving. Where our movement synchronizes with the spining field, we will "see" only that part. I.e. it will appear as a "particle" that appears to move around the field. As thebidea developes, it explains the double slit phenomenon, expansion, why galaxies rotate they way they do etc.
