Uff la misión de ruso del 2009 supera la misión nada de ruso del 2023 localización no de ruso del 2023 no le echaron nada de ganas de hecho ni se ve nada de nada no se ve ni ni nada el nombre de nada de ruso esta misión no se la merece por nada del mundo the Cold War Uff esa televisión nada de ruso a la inversa es épica una salida épica y tiene todo lo épico 2009 y 2020 están de huevos maduración peinado de ruso la inversa
2009 Makarov: directly shoots up an airport and is part of the action when in missions. 2023 Makarov: kinda copies 9/11 and mainly tries to stay off the radar from military and law enforcement when on missions.
I always killed Harper because I dislike black ops 3s campaign. I don’t hate but besides the point. I want menedez to lose even though he raises good points. Farid in the background if he survived actually prevents thousands of innocent deaths off screen so that’s a good reason to sacrifice Harper, sacrificing the few to save the many. So if I can only lose Harper and Farid I’m ok with that as far as storytelling because less lives are lost. Plus capturing Mendez on top of that prevents black ops three if you see that ending as canon. It completely crippled Cordez Die plus I love his reaction to his plan failing. I liked woods but I found Harper not my favorite character in BO2, that goes to Briggs just because he’s pretty funny at times.
Alternative ending(Not real): Salazar: *Shoots the marines* Briggs: NO! Salazer: I'll surrender when it's done... Menendez: *Throws briggs off him* Salazer: *Shoots menendez dead now that he doesn't have the admiral as hostage shield* Briggs: WHAT!? WHO'S SIDE ARE YOU ON!?
The sig 556 uh no you cannot throw the bullet into the receiver then close the bolt, ittl simply fall out the magazine well. You gotta push it in the chamber before closing the bolt
