Founded in 2012, 3D Printing Industry has published over 15,000 articles. The go-to 3D printing news service for additive manufacturing professionals is produced by a team of journalists and supported by in-house engineers and AM experts.
Whether attending tradeshows, conferences, or visiting company HQ’s, we have published an average of seven daily articles in our near-decade of reporting. Our editorial team sits on industry-wide panels - whether focused on the development of additive manufacturing or finding the next break-out 3D printing startup.
We actively support our industry through advocacy, adding clarity, and the general advancement of the sector via sharing high-quality information.
On the 3D Printing Industry RU-vid channel, you can access webinar recordings, highlights from 3D printer reviews, and coming soon news updates.
Visit our website for the latest 3D printing news, events, jobs, reviews, and analysis.
Mmm... Best tasting mic ever. You have a good voice Sir but you need to NOT swallow the mic. The extra mouth noises is horrible to listen too. Drink some water! It helps.
Best 3D printing VS Method. Aamm Ok ;) And to answer this wrongly asked question. No, there is best 3D printing method. Each method excels in different area.
Not new been a concept for 30 years. I remember stumbling across a model of HOTOL aircraft in BA livery in the late 80’s at Brooklands museum Weybridge.
£16k for this? Laughable. No heated bed, no heated chamber, no automated bed levelling or z-offset, tiny build volume. . Industrial printer manufacturers are taking the piss out of less knowledgable purchasers.
Hi. I have a note for you about accessibility of your videos. I have partial hearing loss. Your audio has trimmed the high and mids and paired with the low tonal bed music makes this very hard to hear. If it weren't for the autogenerated CC I wouldn't be able to enjoy your high quality production.
Here's how it will go down. The British government won't want to invest in it. the Americans will come along pay the company to fully develop it and then take all the credit.
The FormLabs rep told me that the machine was capable of using third party powders, as they don't manufacture any themselves. They won't guarantee material performance and resolution, that is all.
Looks like you went to a lot of trouble to produce. Nice looking video. Also note the Ultem1010 or PPSU prints on the subtractive tool, nice! But why no Multilateral print? Any follow up with usage of the printer that capitalises on its unique benefits?
Hey, what’s the reason to have a 100° C heated chamber that print material that doesn’t need that temperature and then the funmat ht for ht temperature material with an heated chambers at 90° C
good chamber temp is needed to maintain the stability of the material and printing process. with bad cooling rate once polymer left the extruder, they cool down and shrink, so a higher temp chamber leaves you more room to better control the process and lower the failure rate.
@@wilsonkailunwong2286 thank you for the answer, but I know that, what I was meaning is that is strange that you produce a 3d printer for technical material with a heated chamber at 100° Celsius and at the same time a 3d printer for high temperature materials with a heated chamber at 90° Celsius. It doesn’t make a lot of sense in my opinion. That been said, with an heated chamber at 100° why not make a ht idex 3d printer instead of this. I don’t think it will be a lot more expensive
@@Davide-il3ou HT was the old model which wanna highlight that it is PEEK capable, so “HT”. then more PEEK capable machines come out and they added 10 degrees to it lol. i have both HT and 410pro.
