The Informer is Australia’s newest online news broadcaster. TheInformer conducts interviews, analysis and speaks to Australia and the world’s most recognisable and not so recognisable names. It examines the issues that matter most.
For more information visit our website: theinformer.tv/
Shameful that it turns out Adam Whittington, founder of Project Rescue Children (PRC), is a scam artist who makes up fake "rescues" of children, and the money his scheme raises never actually reaches the kids he claims to help. Where did all the money really go, Adam?
Over 80% of family court cases have an AVO in place. 8 men are taking their lives every week because of whats happening. Lawyers automatically recommend women take out an FVO to get the upper hand in family court negotiations. Some men havent seen their kids in years. The system is broken. Lawyers are feasting on the carcasses of broken families and using whatever they have at their disposal to win.
[CHILDHOOD AND MOTHERHOOD, ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE INCOME PRODUCERS FOR THE SYSTEM. WHY DONT THE COURTS GIVE THE CHILD A SERVICE DOG WITH A COLLAR THAT HAS ABILITY TO OBTAIN AUDIO, VIDEO... FIRST, BEFORE CHANGING CUSTODY??? GET THE ACTUAL INFORMATION WHILE PROTECTING THE CHILD??? DECISION MAKING NEEDS TO BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD AND MOTHER... FORGET THE CORNERSTONE SINCE THE CORNERSTONE STARTED AS A MEASURE OF BEING WILLING TO ALLOW DIVORCE. WOMEN HAVE BEEN ENSLAVED AS WIVES OF MEN, WHICH WAS NEVER OUR CHOICE. THE STATISTICS AS IT STANDS, PROVE THAT MORE CHILDREN ARE BORN FROM UNITENDED PREGNANCIES.. MEANING THE MEN ARE INTENTIONALLY GETTING WOMEN PREGNANT TO OBTAIN THE WEAPON TO USE TO CONTROL WOMEN.. WAKE UP. FATHERS AND MOTHERS ARE NOT THE SAME. MEN AND WOMEN ARE NOT THE SAME. END OF STORY. ]
I understand your point. As per you, men do family violations against his partner, tell me when this happens other way, women do family violence against men and when men ask for help they get nothing. In some cases they get arrested for being men. This is very shameful telling the wrong stories about men who are innocent and still get punished just because he is a man who provides everything to his family. Women get everything from court by just crying in the court. Just think again, all the luxury women enjoying are provided by hard working men. Just check the stats of how many women pick up rubbish from your street every week, The answer is none, The list goes on and on and still only men get blemed of family violence. This is called hypocrisy
I’m one of the few fathers who has been at the receiving end of abuse. The pain and suffering I have gone through is traumatic. There is no way for me to protect my child from her and her grandparents
No faith corruption in court January 2024 and our abuser is now being rewarded. Corruption ICL expert writer, yes agree attacked diminished and destroyed... System abuse the court has caused secondary family violence... Police 2 ADVO 8 event cards if lucky they come all brushed off calling begging for help to be told it's a family law matters.. In court I'm look at with disgust our abuser is looked at with empathy... His perjury rewarded and even supported by ICL Me to shooked can't fathom I say now don't leave stay until childs 12-13... Failed by so many services, DCJ and Police A Judge what kind of mother etc... looking at me with disgusted I have a lot of evidences no one cares believe me I've tried The attorney general's office sent an email my case real FVD even children qualified for a meeting but ELECTRIAL COMMITMENTS AND A LIST OF SO CALLED HELP TO GET IN CONTACT WITH all I have multiple times and all brushed off DV is attacked it has destroyed my family it didn't protect us Child regressed when forced to visit
Family court system in Australia is total farce, biased towards the woman who can cheat on her husband, throw him out of his house, take more than 1/2 legal share of everything and then get her lover to move in with her - ie it is heavily biased towards the sluts of Australia rather than being a factual contract - best advice for young men is not to get married in Australia and even if you have a live in lover after 6 months she is defacto and has the same slut rights under Australian law as a married woman
Justice in Australia is based on the convict system then from there.A corrupt network exists to muzzle anyone who stands up to it.Main problem is justice based on favourites who have connections.Love to see the sim cards.
A FAMILY LAW RE-DESIGN. MARRIAGE AND COURTS NOT NEEDED “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete”………………………………………Buckminster Fuller Current Family Law is the cause of western society’s problems and needs changing. Parental custody, care and control of children is a very simple matter to solve in their interest, given the true desire of “What is best for the child”. We need to separate and discard marriage from family law as they no longer seem to be connected. Marriage can be retained as a spiritual commitment, but must lose the connection to family law. Current family laws need to be replaced with "Equal Parenting Laws" but sequential over time determined by the child's age. We can develop protocols that confer (over time) equal parental rights and responsibilities,…..once parentage is proven. Children’s maturation process has 3 stages of need. See “Childhood and Adolescence” by Peter Hadfield. A.The unconditional love of the mother from birth until about 7 years of age. The mother to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance. B.The conditional love of the father, who takes his children out into the world, gives security and teaches social boundaries from 7 until about 13 years of age. The father to have “thefinalsay” and to receive child allowance. This will encourage the mother to engage (as a quid pro quo) the father in her early stage of child custody. C.The friendship and respect of peers from 13 until 18 years of age. The child to have “thefinalsay”, but boys default to dad and girls to mum unless the child defers. If these 3 stages are not gone through in order, maturation is unlikely to be satisfactorily achieved and mental resilience reduced. This has now become generational. Such a regime of equal parenting rights (over time) would bind parents into a co-operative relationship, because (over time) each will hold the power of “thefinalsay” sequentially when they are best favoured to use it. If the mother does not enthusiastically include the father in her first seven years the father may not enthusiastically include hers later. The most common scenario will be for dad to unofficially extend mums jurisdiction as long as he gets what he and his children want. Cooperation will become endemic with equal parental power over time. Such family protocols would be the default position, allowing love, courtesy and humour to prevail, but could in exceptional cases be varied by the court. Such a family court will need to have 3 possible adjudications when an accusation is made against the other parent. 1."Guilty" and the accused punished. 2. "Not Proven" and the case dismissed. 3. "Innocent" and the accuser punished for bearing false witness. Such an arrangement built into English Law would bring dilemmas that need consideration such as:- 1. Ensuring paternity. It is important to fathers that the children that they accept as theirs are indeed so. Compulsory DNA testing of all children at birth would allow fathers to confirm this if he is doubtful. 2. The “finalsay” parent to:- A) Have custody of the child’s passport. If desirous of taking the child abroad the passport to be stamped for how long and that the secondary parent approves. B) Not move the residency of the child more than 30kms from its previous habitation without the secondary parent’s written approval. C) Receive from the secondary parent a sum of £xxx per week towards the costs of keeping the child. Rights do not mean a selfish assumption that we can have whatever we want. As Tom Paine said “A Declaration of Rights is, by reciprocity, a declaration of duties also. Whatever is my right as a man is also the right of another, and it becomes my duty to guarantee, as well as to possess”.
Statistics actual say that men are more likely to be domestically abused. That's why they bury the statics as they show women in a negative light. It's a great racket that they don't won't to go away. You only have to look at the children's outcomes for single mother homes
A grandmother scared fir a child, or perhaps a toxic grandmother who sought to fabricate abuse that never happened and manipulate the child into lying or perhaps believing abuse had occurred when it happened. Not fir a second to I think the grandmother isn't guilty. No way prosecutors would take it that far, let alone succeed in getting court orders to slap a tracking device on her ankle. Liars and manipulators seeking to alienate a parent from a child should face consequences
The entire family violence issues in family court are a complete and utter lie. Children and Men are the ones who are completely discriminated against by this entire system. It would be interesting if this is a real case or another figment of feministic imagination and embellishment.
@ George Hazim the chief editor of informer TV why are you publishing this false and defamatory story, destroying the life of a single struggling single mother. Show some compassion and take it down
George Hazim please take this story down. It is false and defamatory. There are no police report and immigration has stated there is no investigation. What do you benefit from destroying a single mother’s life who works as a cleaner. Please George Hazim take it down
I know 1st hand the corruption within the family crt judge Hannam Howard’s niece is as bent as her uncle . She gave my g kids to the perpetrator . report writer ignored 8 yrs of Drs reports re my g son born autistic lost all speech etc had to have a parent sleep with him for 9 yrs went to special Ed units via aspect (autism specialists) the judge said my daughter had munchousens by proxy denied other g child’s celiac disease & skin condition.
The whole system is broken. It is adversarial, fuels and encourages hostility, conflict, and animosity, and it definitely does not do what is in the best interests of the child. It is an arena set up to pit parents against each other and enrich the legal fraternity. The system is beyond reform, it needs to be completely repealed and a whole new system established. It should be more like a Coronial Court, all relevant parties can present all evidence, and experts can be used to assess the evidence, and then professional well informed people can make decisions for the well being of the children without the need for continuous rounds of conflict and lawfare.
Towards the end with concussion AFL may survive from this even tho they are being sued rn for it. Afl may be the only other contact sport that can evolve to survive while still being number 1 while both rugby codes die off
What about false allegations to secure interim IVO/AvO against men (sometimes women) ex parte No evidence Parent can’t see the child Takes one year to remove the baseless IVO Meanwhile the parents relationship with the child is compromised or maybe gone for good.