The Fannie and John Hertz Foundation identifies the nation’s most promising innovators in science and technology and empowers them to pursue solutions to our toughest challenges. Launched in 1963, the Hertz Fellowship is the most exclusive fellowship program in the United States, fueling more than 1,200 leaders, disruptors and creators who apply their remarkable talents where they’re needed most - from the future of health care to the future health of our environment. Hertz Fellows hold 3,000+ patents, have founded 375+ companies, and have received 200+ major national and international awards, including two Nobel Prizes, ten Breakthrough Prizes, the National Medal of Technology, the Fields Medal and the Turing Award. Learn more at HertzFoundation.org.
Please be more professional if you want to do this. Too painful to start an hour-long documentary at 2 minutes and 36 seconds and we're flipping around slides and 4 year old invaders. I don't think I need to hear whatever you are trying to say and I don't see how it matters anyway
It's a pity that in your book science is mixed with religion. It's a bad idea to insist on religion and try to convince usvthat yours is the best.Maybe this way you try to gain proselytes for your religion ?. The quotes from the bible have nothing to do with what you claim in the explanations. Then in the book dozens of times you have tired us with that hill with two valleys. Unfortunately, the didactic qualities leave much to be desired. I did not understand what is the novelty of your thery- theology. However it is diluted and poorly explained.
It's the fact that people actually believe wholeheartedly that what he is saying is to be the factual truth....is upsetting. Like, in the mindset of: " he said it. he explained it. makes sense. he is so smart." But unfortunately, only about 1/4 of the information that he speaks upon is actually factual. It's clear that he did minimal research on multiple, MULTIPLE scientific topics that would in fact take over a week to comprehend...EACH! Let alone, be knowledgable enough about the subject to even explain it to others. He's clearly tailored the meaning of each theoretical explanation to what he wants it to mean... hence, speaking from a place of very little knowledge. There is absolutely no way someone could make a compilation of ALL of these scientific findings and be able to provide explanations for them in less than an hour.... therefore his time to "explain" (which he couldn't) does not provide the audience with enough information around the topic, yet only his interpretation (and a naive one if that) to consider what he says to fact or not. But to anyone who reads this thinking "You are a hater and are out to attack the person I look up to" Just keep in mind that each topic addressed within this video would need at LEAST an hour worth of Time to understand the simple dynamics of the science behind it.. I can see how if you have no scientific background it could be believable, but.... clearly he is not speaking from any sort of education behind any topic. I advise anyone who watches these videos to do their own research. Follow whoever you please, lead the life that you choose, but answer me this: If you think what I'm saying is incorrect, why not research it for yourself? If what you are lead to believe is factual information, you never need to second guess yourself to check it out for yourself. Peace, Love, Happiness everyone. I wish you all well 🥰
The problem with people not understanding say Logarithms is because it is a fked up term that doesn't mean anything AND it is put in an expression like a cart that is put BEFORE the horse. It should be another notation with a meaning that is obvious.
What I can do to solve all the crisis? How can i bring back my own knowlege from being share by people who always request to eat and a reason are that " they don't believe that i study by my ownself and own intention. They are trying to prove for over 5 years and are trying to remove and block a nutrients! Capo... could you please explain to the world ? Law in my country isnt work ? What about in the global country , is it Human Rights can be activated !...100 to 0 or any unreasonable reducing are not consider suit to do or appropriate.! I love to include myself amoung simple people and the the sky not a specific group of people ..
Budil chor and fraud company h mane laptop k liye 13999rs. Ka amount 19/05/23 ko paid kiya tha lekin abhi tak budil n to rs. Refund kiye or na product send kiya fraud company s bach k rahe plz sab
I'm just beginning my mathematics journey as someone in their 30s after really hating it at school, because of my surroundings. I always felt like I 'just wasn't good at it,' but I think it was just the methodology of teaching wasn't working for me. My friend would let me copy in class because I couldn't keep up, but when I was in the exam room, I ended up getting a B+. I think it was also a lack of confidence on my part. In my 20s, I matured and realised I loved logic puzzles and simple math challenges and decided to start again and study a STEM degree through open learning. I'm starting from the ground up, using resources meant for kids where I need a really simplified explanation, and it's so satisfying when something 'clicks' after struggling. It's early days but it feels like I'm really overcoming a barrier I've had.
I love that you posted this. It gives me so much motivation and reassurance that I'm am not alone. I say this because I am also in my thirties and looking to go back to college for a stem degree. Good luck on all of your endeavors!!!!
0:04 to 0:09 total rubbish, *everyone* in the world includes people with _dysfunctional brains, as well as general learning difficulties_ , so whether “they want to” or not has nothing to do with it. 0:15 you do realise there are 6 billion people on the planet who are not Americans, I cannot listen to your idiotic statements a second longer…15 was enough for me 😔
i took math in the dark ages, more than half century ago....i sat with my granddaughter in her high school math tutor class the other day and was amazed. The way math is taught now does not seem like computation and getting answers clean and simple. There seems to be a way of thinking being forced into the explanation of learning about numbers. It is also obvious logical, ethical, and philosophical thinking are downplayed now as well as history. This seems on purpose because as the gentleman says math makes long chains that depend on the ones each link directly connects to....philosophical and ethical and logical thinking about the many varied areas of life are much more necessary.......math is a pencil drawing no matter how elaborate all lines running along in a path.....but thinking in philosophical and higher ways is like painting with oils and listening to music that influences the picture painted along with how the emotional experience you are having creates the feeling that will be captured in the painting and communicated to the observer. Math has its lane and it is best kept in its own lane
after university I discovered that if I sit down to learn a subject by myself, deciding what is the most basic concept I can think of that is related to that subject and following my own questions and reasonings from there, answering them by looking for info about each one on multiple sources (youtube, wikipedia, books, etc.) and taking notes of every topic I find while building this reasoning, I can learn most things and understand much better. With that being said, I think math is hard specifically because of the reasoning part. Mathematical reasoning is this misterious thing to me, where you are not very sure HOW your brain came up with the answer or the understanding. I don´t think most people is good at math reasoning/understanding.
i thing it's something that requires training, if all your life you have never worked to solve such mathematical problems then you brain is not trained to think like that, but as you practice more and solve more problems, you brain gets better at coming up with approaches and solutions for new problems. But it does takes time and consistency.
No, not everyone can. If you have 70 IQ you cannot (with almost 100% certainty) be a be a "math person" . It's the hard truth aprox 50% of variance in intelligence is genetic, and can't be changed. The other 50% can hardly be changed. Intelligence is not only about speed or efficient, above and below certain thresholds there are almost qualitative differences. Below a certain IQ, you simply cannot manage absteact thoughts well enough to do anything more than basic arithmetic.
Good thing majority of the people do not fall in that category, so it's more of a great story of laziness (Maybe that also has something to do with genetic variations?). But yes, retardation is an unfortunate condition.
It depends what we consider "good". It's like saying the idea that not everybody can "cook" is not flawed. Everybody (with working hands of course) can cook. Can everybody cook at the level of world class chefs? No. Can everybody become better at cooking? Yes. It depends upon objective.
I bet this is the key part of learning everything when it comes to "Learning for Everyone". Perhaps the realisation that we all see the world different than others is a fact that makes sense. Unfortunately, we cannot standardize that. What I mean is that if we actually make it standard that we do not have to cross to next class with everybody would make things more complicated. I don't know for the better or worse. In short, a LOT of work has to be done on time if the world needs to move forward. I wish education evolves into "Personalized education", and a new world may born.
Practice is key. And don't stop learning math until you're absolutely sure you won't need to come back. Starting over in the middle of a calculus sequence can feel impossible.
Not really an option when taking a course at school There are new topics every week, especially for course like calculus You are either on track every single week from the start to the end, or you are doomed
This is what it means to "go back to the basics". If you lack in any area of math, go to that section on the internet, solve as many problems as you can, and continue up the chain
This is such good advice. When I'm struggling with textbooks and their convoluted explanations, I look at videos aimed at beginners or children, go back to the textbook and its much easier to understand.
I think this is largely true. In high school, I got behind in my Algebra II class because I was goofing off too much at one point. I never recovered in high school. Everything after in math became nearly impossible for me because I failed to grasp a few key things that were pre-requisites for later things. I began to feel that math was hard and that I wasn't good at it. I would have failed that Algebra II course if not for a soft teacher that gave me a barely passing grade that didn't reflect my actual understanding. But a couple years after high school, I decided to go to college and study chemistry and physics. My math was in terrible shape though. I was completely lost in the first class I took, so I dropped it and switched to a remedial algebra course and then started systematically building up. I acquired the concepts steadily and didn't move forward until I understood everything at each point. I aced each math course after that. I loved calculus! I ended up deciding that I liked math and felt like I was pretty good at it. My whole problem in high school was that I got lost because I was inattentive at one point. My feeling that I was bad at math was erroneous. Math absolutely must be learned systematically. You can't skip steps.
The other problem that may not be widely accepted is that majority of the people are just not that smart to think like that. You missing a lot of learning time and trying to cramp up at last with the best bank in the buck topics/concepts is not really how learning works. Fortunately, people have lives to live, so it's not depressing state at all. Unfortunately, it's not the best state of us either.
3:09 Encontrar un método (Kumon) donde cada quién no se pierda parte de la cadena de contenido que necesita si falta a una clase...la clave está en seguir paso a paso la secuencia, de lo contrario tendrá problemas para seguir aprendiendo.
Correct, some subjects depend more on historical facts and require more memorization (history, biology), and others are largely understood from a few basic facts (chemistry is my favorite example, as you can make surprising predictions about chemical reactions and the properties of substances from a handful of concepts).
One of the questions I did not want to hear as a math teacher was "What is this good for?" Asking that question shows they do not know the true reason for studying math.
@@hectorr6299 You study math to become a good thinker. Most of history it was thought of that way. For most people Algebra 1 is enough. Most math you will not use. I had to teach about complex numbers without knowing their use. Later, I found they had limited use for electrical engineers. Do you make the same request to your literature and history teachers?
If you ask me (not a math person, not teacher), I would say math is basically we trying to "engineer" our brains. It's like developing muscles, but you're not exactly developing muscles. Our muscles develop automatically. You are trying to learn techniques and trying to find the best way in a sense to me effective while being efficient with your resources in order to develop muscles. Why exactly? It depends who you may ask. For an absurdist, it just doesn't make sense to do anything at all.
@@laithpi A visual depiction of the chains and of the dependencies of mathematics, for example, the dependencies of machine learning. Machine learning understanding depends on a, a depends on b, b on c, etc. In this way, I think you could see the fundamental building blocks of mathematics.
@@quentin2578 I can't give you a map of dependencies, but I can provide you with brief maps for the topics in each Computer Science and Mathematics, and you can figure it out yourself after some research.
Let's be real people, to be a proper mathematician an Iq of 130 or higher is kinda necessary. Meaning, less 2% of the population can be one. Otherwise, have fun to struggle you're all life
WOW! And y'all really stating this horrifying plan like it's nothing! This is the end of Natural HUMAN IDENTITY. No thank you! Ya'll can keep this junk for the ones who don't know that they will part of the elimination of Human race as a NATURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SPECIES!
Thanks for the presentation. I have a question about utilizing hydrogen as the fuel source. Your slides show that hydrogen will be used within a fuel cell, thus converted to electricity. In other presentations I've seen on hydrogen planes, some insists that hydrogen will be burned to create thrust. Which do you foresee for the future?
