Even Russell & Witgenstein have pointed out the logical fallacy inherent in René Descarte's famous statement _"dubito, ergo cogito, ergo sum",_ which translates to "I doubt, therefore I think, therefore I am".
Audience me jo baithe hain, kabhi ye video dekhe aur ghalti se ye comment padh le to wo jaan le k sabse bade chew tiye tum ho, jo ek down to earth bande par has rahe the aur ek ghochu jisko pata bhi nahi k wo kya bol raha hai usko aise dekh rahe ho jaise Vivah movie me heroine hero ko dekhti hai, tumhare sath bhi wohi hoga jo vivah k baad hota hai, samajh rahe ho na? Sandeep achchhi baat kar sakta tha lekin usne kya kiya? Usne monotheist religions ko ghalat sabit karne k koshish kiya, kyu? Kyuki usko pata hai India me hindu zyada hain unse isko zyada likes milenge aur general tendency yaha kya hai wo batane ki zarurat nahi. Aaj iski ghatiya soch bhi pata chali, isko respect karta tha mai, ye bhi wohi nikla
If you remove the memory from my brain and still I am, for whom ? For you, right ? But your memory is intact, right ? If I remove your memory too then do we exist for each other, without any frame of reference? Absolutely not.. Memory provides the frame of reference, the "I am"ness and hence proved, that I think therefore I am. The guy who asked the question may not have read Rene Descartes thoroughly. If he had read him properly, he would have eaten Sandeep Maheshwari and his stupid audience in 2 minutes. Btw, Indian Philosophy is not philosophy, it's foolosophy
Vedh uthaa k kachre mai dal dega kabhi David hume, Immanuel kant, Bertrand Russell padha hai? Bas metaphysics mai phase raho priori Apriori k bahar aao.... konse maam bap apne bacho k is gavar k paas bhejte hai kya pataa
When one stuck at a question, he start laughing to make discomfort the person who is questioning And it proved here Maheshwari sir And this guy who asking ques,,, is really awesome, brave and intelligent.i feel it bcz i also stu,, of philosophy
Ye satya se bada satya h. K sanatan. K ved upnishad se badh kar kuchh nahi. Hamare ved hi vigyaan h. Mai bahooot deeply ye cjijen jaan gai hun 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Every one sitting here including guest is wearing western style of clothing, but cheering on the statement of putting western philosopy in the garbage😂
Sandeep Maheshwari sirf confidence ke bal pe apne fuddu andhe supporter ke saamne sharif bande ko neecha dikha Diya.yeh gandu audience se 1000 Guna acha hai.proud of you boy.this boy is such a great person.
इंडियन फिलोसॉफी ने दुनिया का क्या दिया , वेस्टर्न कल्चर चाहे जैसा भी हो लेकिन वेस्टर्न ने दुनिया की बहुत कुछ दिया है, टेक्नोलॉजी दी है जीवन को आसान बनाने में उसका योगदान बहुत है , हमने क्या दिया है बाबा दिए जो जूठ ओर पाखंड फैलाने में सबसे आगे है , वेद पर ज्ञान जाड़ रहा है , में दावे से कहता हु इसने वेद पढ़े ही नही है , क्योंकि उसने कोय लॉजिक कोय साइंस नही है, हा अगर आप तोड़ मरोड़ के वेद में विज्ञान साबित करना चाहो तो हो सकता है
Abe dhakkan agar sab me bhagwan hai to duniya me itna rayta kyo fela hua hai bata matlab kuch v Tera matlab hain jo v acha ya bura hota hai vo ultimately bhagwan hi karte hai
Both of them are defaming each other. First, the man said "indian philosophy is (mostly) illogical". He could say it differently like "I don't believe in God as such and I don't believe in spirituality. So, I personally don't like Indian philosophy." Sandeep Maheshwari is on another level. He just use some bizzare offensive language. I don't know if he himself understood Vedas etc. He has too much superiority complex as shown in this video.
"I think therefore I am" is like a first principle of attaining any knowledge, this is something we can be the most sure of, calling descartes a "ghochu" is him calling himself ignorant.
Sandeep sir to thik hi bol rahe hai, but ihape Lefto-islamic-Christ Gang ne unka mazak ura raha hai. Kyuki isme Sandeep sir Lefto-islamic-Christ Gang ke ideology ke aginst bol rahe hai.
