One serious oversight here is the incorrect definition for Earth frame when shown the "orbit view" and then when used in the train scenario. What you used for the train scenario calculations was a rotating (!) frame attached to Earth - so-called Earth Centered Earth Fixed frame. This frame is rotating just as Earth does, this is why you could forget the Earth rotation in your train calculations. However what you have shown on the "orbit view" was a different frame - Earth Centered Inertial frame, which is not rotating, but always pointing into some particular distant stars. Those are two completely different frames!
this channel is seriously underrated. The stereotype of the Indian educational content creator is seriously undermining the amount of good content there is to be found
a well made video from the past now it's 2022 and i'm going through these new videos trying to understand unicode and ascii but instead of that i kinda understood why this world is going backward
At 7:20 for accelerating train reference frame you said that the block moves horizontally even when we hadn't applied a force on it in the horizontal direction. HOW? When the train accelerates it is because of the force produced from engine, there must be the same force or acceleration on the block in the OTHER direction due to newton's 3rd law. So how is no force acting on block but pusedo force is? PLS EXPLAIN - HELP!
Block has acceleration only when it is in contact with train.After just released from table it has no acceleration other than gravity.Block don't remember the acceleration of train after flying off.
Really appreciate the way you describe the complex stuff very easily and clearly. Thanks a lot. After 9 years, we are waiting for the supplementary video.
CHALLENGE to anyone who thinks earth is in an inertial frame of reference and "free falling" objects are an accelerated frame of reference......... Let us say you are in an elevator WITH NO WINDOWS on the moon so there is no air resistance to falling. And the rope holding the elevator breaks on the 500th floor and you and the elevator starts "free falling". And lets say i am in a space ship in outer space moving at constant velocity. WE BOTH WOULD SAY I AM IN AN INERTIAL FRAME. Now you say "free falling" is an accelerated frame of reference. So YOU ARE SAYING we would be in DIFFERENT frames of reference......you in an accelerated frame and me in an inertial frame. SO YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROVE IT EXPERIMENTALLY...RIGHT??????????????????????? Cause if we do identical physics experiments there should be at least ONE experiment where we get different results.....right. WE BOTH AGREE WITH THAT RIGHT?????????????? So tell me what experiment would you do to PROVE you were in an accelerated frame of reference while you are "free falling" inside your elevator???????????? If you can NOT think of an experiment that would give us different results then you must admit that "free fall" is an inertial frame because WE BOTH AGREE THAT me in a space ship in outer space moving at constant velocity is AN INTERTIAL FRAME. And guess what. If you .......while in your "free falling" elevator would hold a ball out and let go of the ball with out applying any force to the ball. Guess what the ball will just float and not move relative to you. Just like it would for me in my space ship. So that would be the same result. What experiment will you tell me about that gives different results???????????
I am confused and no one will help me. (1) I am told there is only ONE type of inertial frame of reference. (2) meaning if i do a physics experiment in ANY inertial frame i will get the SAME RESULTS no matter what inertial frame i am in (3) I am told earth is an inertial frame. (4) I am told being in outer space at a constant velocity is an inertial frame. OK THESE STATEMENTS CONTRADICT ONE ANOTHER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Because if that were ALL true then that would mean that i could do physics experiments in outer space (at a constant velocity) and then do the SAME PHYSICS EXPERIMENT on earth and get the SAME RESULTS. But that IS NOT TRUE. THAT IS A LIE. If i am in outer space(at constant velocity) and i hold a ball out and let go of the ball with out throwing it or pushing it in any direction the ball will just float there. But on earth if i do the SAME experiment the ball will fall to the ground. So there are (1) more than one TYPE of inertial frames of reference OR (2) earth is NOT an inertial frame of reference. SO WHICH IS IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why wont any one answer me???????
I am confused and no one will help me. (1) I am told there is only ONE type of inertial frame of reference. (2) meaning if i do a physics experiment in ANY inertial frame i will get the SAME RESULTS no matter what inertial frame i am in (3) I am told earth is an inertial frame. (4) I am told being in outer space at a constant velocity is an inertial frame. OK THESE STATEMENTS CONTRADICT ONE ANOTHER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Because if that were ALL true then that would mean that i could do physics experiments in outer space (at a constant velocity) and then do the SAME PHYSICS EXPERIMENT on earth and get the SAME RESULTS. But that IS NOT TRUE. THAT IS A LIE. If i am in outer space(at constant velocity) and i hold a ball out and let go of the ball with out throwing it or pushing it in any direction the ball will just float there. But on earth if i do the SAME experiment the ball will fall to the ground. So there are (1) more than one TYPE of inertial frames of reference OR (2) earth is NOT an inertial frame of reference. SO WHICH IS IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why wont any one answer me???????
I have been trying to make sense of relativity and reference frames for so long that I gave up on understanding it because every book, instructor, or website that tried to explain it only made it more abstract and left me more confused than I already was. And then I found your videos and it all FINALLY clicks - you are seriously an incredible instructor!
Código? Hay programas que si se pasa a números, parece el código de la Biblia en su lado más, malvado . Si y no ...una respuesta ...una acción y resultado de esa. Pasado a códigos, Dios 420 El resto es cada palabra así. Eso es solo a partir de Génesis capítulo 3 , pues antes hay otro patrón...que solo se repetirá en algunas partes después de genesis 3. Código y juego . Cae el juego. No hay juego en Genesis capítulo 2.
