What's better? 30 fps 8K that's made into 60 fps, or 60 FPS 4K that upscaled to 8K? It may not be the same that's ahead for every scenario but it seems worthwhile to explore.
Great, so if I export using the first method and the other party does have the assets contained in the media pool, I suppose the project will still work but with place holders, right?
Is there a way to keep audio and video tracks of a file linked? for some reason in Premiere they look like independent clips so moving one does not move the other
This was great information, but am I the only one that feels the lens blur when used with this method seems like it's in an incorrect blend mode? Almost like it's overlaying and creating almost a misty look if the effect is cranked up too high.
Just want to note that if youve done a bunch of retiming and want to just set this for everything, going to file > project settings and set the same setting there, thatll handle it for everything when you export
I was confused by all the files that are created and dont know how to handle them. Is it normal? Cant I just merge them into one? I find it very stressing if you need to move a clip later. I dont use 2-3 clips per project but 20-30 different thats why I ask
Why does Premiere import the videos? I have an issue trying to export DaVinci resolve timelines into Premiere Pro... I know it's a different situation , but I'm desperately trying to find a solution My editor uses Premiere and I use Da Vinci. We both have a hard drive with the exact same footage. I do selections in Da Vinci Resolve and export my timelines for Premiere using XML. The idea is that my editor could import those timelines to finalise the edit in Premiere Pro. The problem is, when the editor imports the XMLs, it creates duplicated footage in the bins and lots of issues. Do you have a solution for this?
thank you. I cant believe how awful Da Vinci is for the end user when the goddamn "export premiere xml" output dumps out video files when all I want is the xml and the video checkbox is unchecked. THIS was what I wanted. but of course its buried in the menu instead of clearly in the UI.
While this is nice and very convenient, is not new as we were able to do this with previous versions using the magic mask. I am pumpted for this upgrade though
Just what I needed. I didn't know it was so CPU intensive though. As an experiment I've just added 45s stretched to 6:30 and it's going to take 4.5 hours on my M1 max, 64GB MBP!
It looks very organic and the sharpness is beautiful! I would really like to achieve the same organic appearance and sharpness on the skin. How do you do it? and how they converted it to Arri lut
Great tutorial but Depth Map is not available on the free version. Just ran into that wall. I was able to do everything but it watermarks it. Looks like I need to pay for the upgrade. But I have a good reason now.
nice video. I tried to apply it to my video and out the nodes like you showed but it still doesn't give me the greyed out visualization of the depth map.. Any advice?
Hello, I'm new to your channel, and I found this really helpful I am quite curious that if it gives you the bokeh balls when there are lights in the background?
I literally wasn't sure about importing davinci resolve timlene in premiere but randomly checked on the internet and found this... Thanks it really saved so much time.
Did you use optical flow in Davinci, because this doesn't seem as if you did as optical flow is always smooth. That doesn't mean it is going to be good, but it is always smooth.