GTO in poker stands for Game Theory Optimal. It’s a complex set of rules that helps the player make the best possible move in a game of no-limit Hold’em and protects them from getting exploited. With our GTO Poker Charts you will know what decision to make Pre-Flop in almost every possible situation.
A few things to note here. - It is a multiway pot - UTG opens and BTN Cold Calls So yes in this instance it is a fold. You should 3 Bet(which in this instance is a squeeze) AQJT Double Suited and fold all other AQJT
really interesting product for me/ I`ve decided to cchange the discipline from NLH to PLO, and your free access for preflop rfi is absolutly amazing, also the filters and the possibility of write down syntax to filter out hands is genius. Definitely will buy it as soon as learn preflop rfi ranges. Find that product on 2+2
Hi. looks good ! Now, I always have this question with the stack sizes : when you select 25 as the effective stack, what does it mean ? that effective stack is 25bb or more ? Or does it mean you are still between 20bb and 25bb ? Same for selecting 20bb, does it mean off stack just passed under 20bb ? or that off stack is above 20bb (and below 25bb). This was never quite clear to me when tools don't explicitly mention "xxBB < stack < yyBB". I feel interpretation may vary depending on the software developer. Can you precise, for example, if eff stack is 22bb, which stack selection I should do : 25 or 20 ? Thanks
Some filters to try out on PLO Genius. You can use following syntax to filter out hands from result windows Operators: ! - not : - and Ranks and suits: 23456789TJQKA. standard ranks R, O, N. variable ranks (RROO - double paired hands) x,y,z. variable suits (xxyy - double suited hands) +. indicate ascending card ranks in a range (T8+ = T8,J9,QT,KJ,AQ) $R. broadway card [A-T] $B. big card [A-J] $M. middle card [T-7] $Z. small card [6-2] $N. no-low card [K-9] $F face card [K-J] $W. wheel card [A,2,3,4,5]You can use following syntax to filter out hands from result windows Operators: ! - not : - and Ranks and suits: 23456789TJQKA. standard ranks R, O, N. variable ranks (RROO - double paired hands) x,y,z. variable suits (xxyy - double suited hands) +. indicate ascending card ranks in a range (T8+ = T8,J9,QT,KJ,AQ) $R. broadway card [A-T] $B. big card [A-J] $M. middle card [T-7] $Z. small card [6-2] $N. no-low card [K-9] $F face card [K-J] $W. wheel card [A,2,3,4,5] double suited broadway---no pair $R:xxyy!(AA,KK,QQ,JJ,TT,99,88,77,66,55,44,33,22) $R:xxyy!(RR) dub suited ----------------------------------------------------------------- zero gapper ------------------ 2345+:xxyy 1 gap ----------- 2346+:xxyy 2 gap --------- 2347+:xxyy Ace, No pair ---------------------- xxyy!(RR):A Broadway, no pair ----------- xxyy!(RR):$B tri suited ----------- xxyx rainbow ----------- xywz ss ----------- xyyz
Nice chart software. Do you know of any solutions available for FR straddle game? I'd love to see what solvers do vs UTG straddle and BTN straddles pre and postflop.
I have renamed this from Spin and Go Pre-Flop Wizard to Spin and Go Pre-Flop Guru so as not to be confused with my affiliate the most awesome GTO Wizard
I appreciate you putting out this video and the previous one as well. The squeeze play is something you see quite often by good regs or pro cash game players, but I think many beginning / recreational players have trouble with it from both ends. #1 Recs probably don’t have much clue what comprises a squeeze range in general or from what position, and likely have the tendency to heavily overfold in spots when they are squeezed, bc they are quite uncomfortable finding 4 bets or calls unless they have the nuts. #2 recs probably don’t utilize the squeeze play nearly enough bc again, they most likely don’t understand RFI well enough around the table to find a balanced squeeze range. Thus, they are heavily exploitable when they do squeeze, because it is heavily nutted Coming from the perspective of a low stakes online tournament grinder, I am focusing a lot of time right now on studying GTO preflop. I was looking for GTO squeeze ranges, not just the normal 3 bet, 4 bet, 5 bet ranges you can get from pretty much any poker training site today. I wanted to have the confidence that when I make a squeeze play, I act as if I have a value hand. For me, as a math-oriented person, I can only have this level of confidence in my game if I know that my play is GTO approved. However, it is difficult to find GTO squeeze ranges, and solvers are not cheap. I understand that these ranges are only six max, not full ring, and this is for cash games, wt/ ante. However it is at least a starting point for me and definitely going to give me a nice bump to my win rate. Most squeeze and vs squeeze spots happen in the last 6 positions at the table anyway, since you cannot squeeze nearly as often when UTG opens and UTG 1 calls, due to them having much tighter ranges in the first place. If you could expand these to cover 8max tournaments with a 10% ante or know where to find these charts, it would make my day.
This is really good-Charts are very well organized. All I need is for you to narrate everything, because you got a great British instructional voice making it easier to understand process content (I am more of an auditory learner). I’d rather hear something than read it, or if I read it I will follow along better. Siri has some brtish voices but nothing close to yours my good man. 👍 🍻
Where does one download your poker charts. Also did you input this solver information yourself or was this AI solver that put together optimal strategies. These are different than PIO solver, that’s why Im asking
Hi EffortlessAwareness, Sorry there should be a link in the description which I have now added. www.gtocharts.com/ The ranges were created by working through as many preflop scenarios as possible in different Poker Formats, using both Monker Solver, Pio Solver and also some private proprietary solvers. The results were then correlated to give you the easily accessible preflop charts for all positions.
What is interesting to me is that a few of the old school players who are admittedly not to big on GTO Strategy have had a Great deal of success over the last several years!
8:48 Wow, most of villains QQ combos are supposed to fold against a 1/4 pot cbet! On the one hand, I get that QQ only has two outs to improve against any top pair or better hand which is pretty bad. This is probably why the solver prefers to continue with the suited connectors that have a weaker pair, but more ways to improve with straight or flush draws. On the other hand, folding a hand that is well above second pair to a single, small bet seems incredibly nitty.
Let's not say easy but if you are willing to play some poker and then analyse your hands with GTO Wizard then you can definitely make some big improvements. Age should not be a barrier for learning.
I like the basic idea here of charts that apply to realistic rake for lower stakes games (5%) and using a 3bet or fold strategy to mitigate the effects of that relatively high rake. However, something seems very off with the opening ranges here. I would expect these ranges to be substantially tighter than the no rake ranges from Cash Game B, but they are nearly as wide. More concerning, there are some offsuit hands included here that are even wider than in the no rake ranges! I will list them by position below. UTG open: full combos of KTo, partial combos of A9o and QJo MP open: full combos of A9o, KTo, and QTo, partial combos of A8o and JTo CO open: partial combos of A7o, A5o, K9o, Q9o, J9o, and T9o
Hi synchronium24, I hear what you are saying and will go over some of the ranges you have highlighted. I compared my ranges with that from GTO Wizard for UTG and they seem similar. KTo, QTo partial combos are opened and even full combos of QJo. Link below to screenshot of GTO Wizard 5% 4BB CAP, Only 3bet or fold vs open, no 4bet allin and no limping BvB tinyurl.com/yxj6nt4l
@@gtopokercharts9564 не могу понять в разных видео у вас на одну и ту же позицию,программа показывает разные диапазоны.почему так? I can't understand in different videos you have the same position, the program shows different ranges.why is that?
@@АлександрЧацкий-о4д Which videos are referring to? Some are different because of different rake structures. I have also adjusted the BB ranges recently for the 6 Max C charts as they were incorrect.
@@gtopokercharts9564 in this video-ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Kkh2GzMQmh0.html&ab_channel=GTOPokerCharts ,in this video-ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Kkh2GzMQmh0.html&ab_channel=GTOPokerCharts,they differ a little, what is the difference, I can't understand?how to open it correctly с UTG?and from other positions, too, everything is different
Cool charts. I've started playing on ignition here in OZ and am winning so far, only had an account for 2 months though. I haven't used these before but when my bankroll increases a bit more I think I'll need to learn to play a bit more balanced.
Thanks, really nice video and charts! Will this work also on my mobile browser? I am worried how will it work on mobile- those 3bet on the top popup charts.
